Friday, September 13, 2013

LETTER TO WALTER HAEKEFER Part 7



   THE DEVIL’S HAARP: WEATHER WEAPONS & RECENT “NATURAL” DISASTERS

By Tim Coles* | Sabbah Report | www.sabbah.bizBySR Editor  09/24/2010





This is the HAARP Research Station in Gakona, Alaska.



IN 1997 THE US SPACE COMMAND DECLARED WAR ON THE WORLD



BY- COMMITTING AMERICA

TO- ” TO FULL SPECTRUM DOMINANCE"

BY- 2020, “



TO CLOSE the EVER-WIDENING GAP - between…

“DIMINISHING RESOURCES&INCREASING MILITARY COMMITMENTS”



THIS- DOCTRINE

WAS- APPROVED and EXPANDED

BY- THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF

IN - 2000

FOR -DICK CHENEY’s PROJECT -for the NEW AMERICAN CENTURY



     HOWEVER - IT DID NOT GO FAR THROUGH ENOUGH

THE- DOCTRINE

WAS-EXPANDEDFURTHER

BY- THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATIOIN

FROM- DOMINATING“LAND, SEA, AIR & SPACE”

TO- DOCTRINE, IDEOLOGY & CYBERSPACE.

EVERYTHING AMERICA

&- IT’S PILLARS

(BRITAIN and ISRAEL) - DO MUST

THEREFORE, BE UNDERSTOOD

WITHIN- THE CONTEXT

OF- “FULL SPECTRUM DOMINANCE ”



IN 2003 the United States AIR FORCE SPACE COMMAND



ANNOUNCED- a “VISION

CALLING- FOR PROMPT GLOBAL

STRIKE- SPACE SYSTEMS

WITH- THE CAPABILITY

TO- DIRECTLY

APPLY- FORCE

FROM- OR THROUGH SPACE

AGAINST- TERRESTIAL OBJECTS”









In order to achieve this,

the- air force

has- to control

“natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counter-space control”,



hence- “weather-modification offers the war fighter a

wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an

adversary,”



thereby- allowing the US

to- “own the weather”

and- master “the science of chao”,

as- the US Air Force explained in 1996.



Britain’s Ministry of Defence (MoD)

revealed- in 2010

that- far

from- reversing these trends,

“Weather modification will continue to be explored”.



A decade earlier, in 1999 - the European Parliament’s

Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defence Policy warned



That - “despite the existing conventions”,

referring- to the UN General Assembly Resolution banning- environmental warfare,

“military research is ongoing on environmental manipulation as a weapon,



as- demonstrated for example

by- the Alaska-based HAARP

[High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program] system”



PUTTING INTO PRACTICE THEN SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WILLIAM COHEN’S SUGGESTION



that- “electromagnetic waves”

could- alter the climate

And- control earthquakes

& volcanoes remotely”1.



This was compounded by a Czech military paper,

which- stated

that- “HAARP

can- ionize and heat the atmosphere

significantly -  affecting

the- airflow,



and- thus should

cause- storms, tornados

and- extreme heat or frost”,



going on to say that “it can be anywhere in the world

to- create artificial lightning,

stronger- than any natural [lightning]“..













The latter point - was confirmed by the US Air Force paper:



Possible- mechanisms

to- investigate would be ways

to- modify

the- electropotential characteristics

over- certain targets

to- induce

lightning- strikes

on- the desired targets

as - the [generated] storm

passes - over

their- location



Even if power levels achieved were insufficient to be an effective strike weapon,



the- potential

for- psychological operations

in- many situations

could- be fantastic



“BAE SYSTEMS DESIGNED & BUILT - the [HAARP] FACILITY,”

          ACCORDING TO THE WAR CORPORTATION’S website,

operating- software - and controls

under- a series of contracts

valued- at more than 250 million US dollars

from- the Office of Naval Research”.





HAARP, according to its Alaska website,

employ[s]- the capability

of- stimulating

to- a varying degree

small - localized regions

of- the ionosphere”

causing- an ionospheric lift,





in- order

to- study methodically,

and- in a detailed manner

what- nature

produces- randomly and regularly

on-  a much larger scale”.



That is only HAARP Alaska, however,

and that is only what they are telling us.

According- to the website,

there- are HAARP facilities

in- Latin America & Tajikistan,

about- which

nothing- is known

unlike- HAARP Alaska,





they are not open to selected members of the public









THIS MEANS that H.A.A.R.P. is FUNDED BY THEPENTAGON

contracted- to & designed

by - private war corporations,



developed- through America’s

DARPA - Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency



and- owned

by- the US Air Force &Navy –

yet- we are expected

to- believe

That - it is not a weaponized military application



This official position cannot be taken very seriously,

especially- given

that- those agencies

are- committed

to- “full spectrum dominance”



“The ionosphere is the part of the atmosphere between space and the earth



in- which electrically charged atoms, or ions,

reflect- radio waves,”

 BAE explained in a news release,

making- long-distance

radio- communication possible”.

This is achieved by irradiating the ionosphere

in- order

to- send Extremely Low Frequency (ELF)

waves- down

to- submarines

and- other earthbound appliances.

According to HAARP,

it- is also designed

to- “x-ray”

the- earth

in- order

to- find

oil - gas, minerals,

hidden - submarines

&- subterranean bunkers



The tomographer Brooks Agnew explained how:



In- 1983

I - did tomography

with- 30 watts,

looking- for oil

in- the ground.

I found 26 oil wells over a nine State area,

and- 100%

of- the time

was - accurate,

with - just 30 watts

of- power beaming

straight -  into solid rock.

The resulting vibrations

give- mineral

tomographers- information

about - what is

under- the surface.

HAARP, however,

by- its own admission,

uses- 3.6 million watts,

with- the aim

of- producing

an- apocalyptic 100 billion watts3

Testifyingto the European Parliament in 1998- the physicist Rosalie Bertell

described - the background

to- HAARP…

If radiation is projected into the ionosphere,

huge- amounts

of- energy

can- be generated

and- used

to- annihilate

a- given region…

[HAARP] enables communications to take place

with- submerged submarines

and can - in theory,

create- geomagnetic pathways

to- guide particle beams

which- could then

deposit- large amounts

of- energy

anywhere - on the globe



In - simpler terms,

HAARP - with its power

of- intimidation,

of- delivery

or- denial

of- electrical energy

on - a global scale

and - its control - of communications,

is- an element

of- a system

which- could control

the- global village

in- some frightening ways.

IN 1998 a EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT COMMITTEE

DEMANDED- THAT THE U.S. YIELD

ITS - H.A.A.R.P. SECRETS



OF COURSE - IT REFUSED TO DO



IN 1999, the EUROPEAN PALIAMENT’S COMMITTEE- on the…

   ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION



published a Report on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy, incorporating a Draft Resolution,



which read:



The military are developing ever more powerful weapons



which inflict- widespread & devastating damage on the environment.



A modern war entails greater environmental destruction

than any other-environment-destructive activity





[Article 27 of the Draft Resolution]

considers HAARP- by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment



to be a global concern- and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications



to be examined- by an international independent body before any further research and testing;



regrets the repeated refusal- of the United States administration [then Clinton's]



to send anyone in person- to give evidence to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting



held by its competent committee - into the environmental and public risks…



[HAARP] - could result in changes in weather patterns.







It could also influence whole ecosystems…

Another damaging consequence - of HAARP

is the occurrence - of holes in the ionosphere

caused - by the powerful radio beams.



The ionosphere protects us from incoming cosmic radiation.

The hope is that the holes - will fill again,

but- our experience of change

in- the ozone layer

points- in the other direction.

This means substantial holes in the ionosphere that protects us…

If - used

as - a military weapon

this- can have

a- devastating impact

on- an enemy.

HAARP can deliver millions of times more energy to a given area - than any other conventional transmitter



HAARP- has links

with- 50 years

of- intensive

space- research

for- military purposes

including the Star Wars project,

to- control

the- upper atmosphere

and- communications

This kind of research

has- to be regarded

as- a serious threat

to- the environment,

with- an incalculable impact

on- human life

Even now nobody knows what impact HAARP may have.

We- have

to- beat down

the- wall

of- secrecy

around- military research,

and set up the - right to openness & democratic scrutiny

of- military research projects,

and- parliamentary control.







The Resolution was delayed until 2003, and subsequently dismissed:



HAARP - “for Arctic Europe

is - a military program

The [European] Commission has no competence,

nor - indeed the expertise,

to- carry out the examination

requested - by the Parliament”



In other words, everyone got paid off and/or threatened.



In 2000 - Rosalie Bertell

informed- The Times (London)

that- America and Britain

are- working

on- weather systems

as- a potential weapon.

The methods include the enhancing

of- storms

and- the diverting

of- vapour rivers

in- the Earth’s atmosphere

to - produce targeted droughts or floods“,

which- the US Air Force

recommended- in 1996

and- the MoD

tacitly- reaffirmed

in- 2010





Bertell has also stated that



it would be rash not to associate HAARP with the space laboratory construction which is separately being planned by the United States…



The - ability

of - the HAARP, Spacelab, rocket

combination - to deliver

very- large amount

of - energy,

comparable - to a nuclear bomb,

anywhere - on earth

via - laser

and- particle beams

are- frightening





The project is likely to be “sold” to the public



as- a space shield

against- incoming weapons

or - for the more gullible

a- device

for- repairing

the- ozone layer

Or simply not mentioned at all.

The- topic

is- completely off

the- media agenda:

RokGolob, a social scientist at the University of Ljubljana, Slovenia,wrote



that- “[g]eophysical weapons today

is- a taboo topic

that - is often

only- superficially treated,”

going on to explain, rather ominously, how:



Geophysical weapons

are- an important aspect

of- the true integrity

of- modern warfare,

in - addition to all the most modern weapons

also- use

the- scheduler Earth

and- the natural processes

as- a weapon…

Many scientists believe that a possible cause

for ecological disasters

are- secret

and- unpunished

geophysical- weapons

in- use



















This view is confirmed by a number of warnings

from- international organizations

such- as NATO,

the - International Committee of the Red Cross,

the official documents the Ukrainian and Russian parliament

on- the dangers

of- Geophysical weapons [and now the EU].

Zbigniew Brzezinski, former national security adviser to US President Carter, and J.F. McDonald, Science Advisor to Lyndon Johnson,



have- published

a- document

on- geophysical weapons,

which were described

as- having

the- real possibility

of- negative effects

on- the civilian population.

Compounding Golob’s research,

particularly- in relation

to- using

natural - cycles,

a Czech military intelligence article explained how,



Under - certain

meteorological - conditions

which - are constantly changing

but - they can be predicted

ionoféře - can “steal”

a- large amount

of- electromagnetic energy

that- is there

due- to ions

located- in difficult

to- imagine quantities”.

The resulting amount of electromagnetism can be directed

against- earthbound targets,

as- the EU commissions

have- warned,

making- it

the- ultimate weapon of mass destruction

According to a pro-HAARP article in Wired magazine, which otherwise dismisses all of the above as a conspiracy theory,



“A Russian military journal warned that blasting the ionosphere



would- trigger a cascade

of- electrons

that- could flip

the- Earth’s magnetic poles



“Simply speaking, the planet will ‘capsize’,” it warned.”



HAARP- is “so strong

it- could

trigger- earthquakes

And by dumping all those radio waves into the ionosphere,



HAARP- could turn

a- miles-wide

portion- of the upper atmosphere

into- a giant lens

On the subject of the “giant lens”,



shortly- before, the…

Haiti,

Chile,

China,

Japan,

and New Zealand

earthquakes- in 2010,

“strange lights” - were reported-in the skies above

many of those countries

these from the China earthquake in 2008

(seeVideo 1 and Video 2).



Writing about something else, Wired noted how,

At- about 125 miles up,

HAARP’s- waves

can- energize free electrons,

which- collide

with- neutral atoms

to- produce

a - glow like

the- aurora borealis

which- would explain

the- lights observed

prior- to the 2010 earthquakes



In- 2010

Haiti -which has been

subjected- to centuries

of- brutal French

and- American

colonial- intervention,

was - hit

by- a devastating earthquake

which- killed 200,000 people.

Russian Intelligence reported that



since- the end

of- the decade

of- the 70s

in- the last century,

the US “advanced a lot”

in- the state

of- its earthquake weapons

and - according to these reports -they now use equipment

with- Pulse, Plasma

& - Tesla Electromagnetic

& - Sonic technology

Together-  with “shock wave bombs”.

This would be consistent with the “experiments”

conducted- by the psychopaths

at- HAARP.



According to the Russian report,

the- State Department, USAID and the US Southern Command

began- its work

of- “humanitarian invasion”

by- sending

at- least 10,000 soldiers and contractors,

to- control Haitian territory,

rather- than the UN,

after- the devastating

experimental earthquake”.

It should be noted that,

although Obama’s Quadrennial Defence Review 2010



does - not mention geophysical weapons

or - weather modification,

it - does clarify











the new doctrine of militarizing aid relief,

thereby- giving

the- US

a- pretext

to- occupy

a- given country

extreme - weather events

may - lead

to-  increased demands

for - defence support

to- civil authorities

for- humanitarian assistance

or- disaster response

both- within

the- United States & overseas





One official source that does mention such weapons is the MoD’sStrategic Trends Programme 2010



which - states - that  Directed Energy Weapons

will - be capable

of - discrete target discrimination,

producing - a strike beam

or - field of electromagnetic energy,

acoustic - energy

or - atomic scale particles

to - cause disruptive - or  damaging effects,

at- near instantaneous speeds,

to- equipment,

infrastructure

or personnel.

They will [emphases in original] have widespread employment including:

hand- emplaced “suitcase” devices;

and- ground, sea and air-based systems,

with- applications

that- include engine disablement

and- infrastructure attack [emphasis added.

These are consistent with HAARP].



“As regards the final result of the tests of these weapons,



the [Russian Northern Fleet] report warns that there is a US plan to destroy Iran through a series of earthquakes”.



“It can’t reach Iran, if that’s your question,” quipped one of HAARP’s developers, “Dennis Papadopoulos” – not his real name – speaking to Wired.



This statement, buried at the end of an otherwise propagandistic article,



is a tacit admission that HAARP is indeed a weapon,

otherwise why say such a thing?



“Papadopoulos” added: “But if I put HAARP on a ship, or on an oil platform, who knows?”6

Why would “Papadopoulos” and his psychopathic colleagues need to put a HAARP facility on a sea platform when they could establish a HAARP facility in a country near to the one they wish to destroy?



Contrary to the HAARP Alaska facility, which is partly open to the public, there are numerous HAARP facilities, according to the official website, one of which is in Tajikistan, which is near Iran and borders China.



This is in keeping with the statement of “Papadopoulos” about building a facility near Iran in order to “reach”it.



Furthermore, Britain’s Ministry of Defence had already written about using unspecified new weapons (possibly neutron) in “outfacing irresponsible nuclear powers and in opposing demographically strong nations”.



The most “demographically strong nation” is China.



Afghanistan separates China from Iran, and is occupied by Britain and America.



Tajikistan, which borders Afghanistan and China, is close enough for a HAARP facility, assuming “Papadopoulos” is right,



in order to attack China (which suffered an earthquake and flood in 2010), and to attack Iran, especially given Tajikistan’s poverty, lack of defence, and weak government.



As noted above, HAARP Alaska’s website explained how



All of these installations have as their primary purpose the study of the ionosphere, and most employ the capability of stimulating to a varying degree small, localized regions of the ionosphere in order to study methodically, and in a detailed manner what nature produces randomly and regularly on a much larger scale.



In other words, HAARP can and does cause natural disasters

they claim on a miniscule level and “to a varying degree”.



Not wanting to limit their deterrence capabilities, the Russians have built several HAARP facilities.



As the US Air Force noted in 1996, the “beauty” of “owning the weather” and mastering “the science of chaos” is that nobody can prove if the given event is anthropogenic or not.



Added to which, Obama announced an increase in US exports at a time when Russia is banning exports after its unprecedented droughts in 2010.













Wreck another country’s economy with a weather weapon,



and- force it to borrow

from- the IMF (as we have seen with Pakistan),

in- order to get them to purchase American exports.



The circumstantial evidence is getting too much to ignore



In 2010, we have had:

A - “sink hole” form in the ground in Guatemala;



Landslides - in Guatemala and Italy;



severe- droughts in Russia;



forest fires- in Russia and Bolivia;



floods- in China, Taiwan, Pakistan, Niger and Mexico;

a- hurricane which missed Mexico;



a- hurricane which hit Burma;



a- volcanic eruption in Iceland;



and- earthquakes

in- Haiti, Chile, China, Japan, Ne Zealand



added to which Britain’s Ministry of Defence anticipates

how- new technologies

could- create “disastrous outcomes, planned & unplanned”

note the word planned –

the- culmination

of- which

is- a “doomsday scenario”

meaning- “the end of the world,

or- at least

of- humanity”.

What use is “full spectrum dominance”

if there is nothing left to dominate?

Notes

1. Shachtman, N., “Strange New Air Force Facility Energizes Ionosphere, Fans Conspiracy Flames”, Wired, Issue 17, No. 8, 20 July 2009. This has subsequently disappeared from the internet, but if you type the quotes into a search engine, you can find traces of it from Wired’s “Danger Room”, etc.

2. Brooks Agnew interviewed in Wendy Robbins (director) and Paula Randol-Smith (co-producer), 1998, Holes in Heaven? HAARP and Advances in Tesla Technology. Robbins’s film is very informative, hence very well hidden, and actually contains interviews with HAARP maniacs who essentially admit they do not know what they are doing. Her film is serious and very different from the popular CBC broadcast film on HAARP, which can be found at here. Needless to say, there are massive efforts to make all of this seem like a conspiracy theory, hence the Canadian film shows activists in shadow, making the whole thing seem like science fiction. Added to which, HAARP is also the subject of another propaganda film by former Navy SEAL-turned-pro-wrestler Jesse Ventura – clearly another effort to undermine serious discussion. Furthermore, HAARP has been the subject of X Files episodes and Marvel Comics, as well as Wired magazine’s dismissals of its opponents as “tinfoil-hatted lunatics”. The propaganda trying to undermine the serious discussion about HAARP is disgraceful, but, considering the kind of world we live in, completely predicable.

3. Official documents cited in Nick Begich and Jeane Manning, Angels Don’t Play This HAARP (Anchorage: Earthpulse Press).

4. Shachtman, N., “Strange New Air Force Facility Energizes Ionosphere”.

5. Shachtman, N., “Strange New Air Force Facility Energizes Ionosphere”.

6. Shachtman, N., “Strange New Air Force Facility Energizes Ionosphere”.

7. Shachtman, N., “Strange New Air Force Facility Energizes Ionosphere”.

* Tim Coles is a writer and filmmaker.

 

No comments: