THE DEVIL’S HAARP: WEATHER WEAPONS & RECENT “NATURAL” DISASTERS
By Tim Coles* | Sabbah Report | www.sabbah.bizBySR Editor 09/24/2010
This is the HAARP Research Station in Gakona, Alaska.
IN 1997 THE US SPACE COMMAND DECLARED WAR ON THE WORLD
BY- COMMITTING AMERICA
TO- ” TO FULL SPECTRUM DOMINANCE"
BY- 2020, “
TO CLOSE the EVER-WIDENING GAP - between…
“DIMINISHING RESOURCES&INCREASING MILITARY COMMITMENTS”
THIS- DOCTRINE
WAS- APPROVED and EXPANDED
BY- THE JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF
IN - 2000
FOR -DICK CHENEY’s PROJECT -for the NEW AMERICAN CENTURY
HOWEVER - IT DID NOT GO FAR THROUGH ENOUGH
THE- DOCTRINE
WAS-EXPANDEDFURTHER
BY- THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATIOIN
FROM- DOMINATING“LAND, SEA, AIR & SPACE”
TO- DOCTRINE, IDEOLOGY & CYBERSPACE.
EVERYTHING AMERICA
&- IT’S PILLARS
(BRITAIN and ISRAEL) - DO MUST
THEREFORE, BE UNDERSTOOD
WITHIN- THE CONTEXT
OF- “FULL SPECTRUM DOMINANCE ”
IN 2003 the United States AIR FORCE SPACE COMMAND
ANNOUNCED- a “VISION
CALLING- FOR PROMPT GLOBAL
STRIKE- SPACE SYSTEMS
WITH- THE CAPABILITY
TO- DIRECTLY
APPLY- FORCE
FROM- OR THROUGH SPACE
AGAINST- TERRESTIAL OBJECTS”
In order to achieve this,
the- air force
has- to control
“natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counter-space control”,
hence- “weather-modification offers the war fighter a
wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an
adversary,”
thereby- allowing the US
to- “own the weather”
and- master “the science of chao”,
as- the US Air Force explained in 1996.
Britain’s Ministry of Defence (MoD)
revealed- in 2010
that- far
from- reversing these trends,
“Weather modification will continue to be explored”.
A decade earlier, in 1999 - the European Parliament’s
Committee on Foreign Affairs, Security and Defence Policy warned
That - “despite the existing conventions”,
referring- to the UN General Assembly Resolution banning- environmental warfare,
“military research is ongoing on environmental manipulation as a weapon,
as- demonstrated for example
by- the Alaska-based HAARP
[High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program] system”
PUTTING INTO PRACTICE THEN SECRETARY OF DEFENSE WILLIAM COHEN’S SUGGESTION
that- “electromagnetic waves”
could- alter the climate
And- control earthquakes
& volcanoes remotely”1.
This was compounded by a Czech military paper,
which- stated
that- “HAARP
can- ionize and heat the atmosphere
significantly - affecting
the- airflow,
and- thus should
cause- storms, tornados
and- extreme heat or frost”,
going on to say that “it can be anywhere in the world
to- create artificial lightning,
stronger- than any natural [lightning]“..
The latter point - was confirmed by the US Air Force paper:
Possible- mechanisms
to- investigate would be ways
to- modify
the- electropotential characteristics
over- certain targets
to- induce
lightning- strikes
on- the desired targets
as - the [generated] storm
passes - over
their- location
Even if power levels achieved were insufficient to be an effective strike weapon,
the- potential
for- psychological operations
in- many situations
could- be fantastic
“BAE SYSTEMS DESIGNED & BUILT - the [HAARP] FACILITY,”
ACCORDING TO THE WAR CORPORTATION’S website,
operating- software - and controls
under- a series of contracts
valued- at more than 250 million US dollars
from- the Office of Naval Research”.
HAARP, according to its Alaska website,
employ[s]- the capability
of- stimulating
to- a varying degree
small - localized regions
of- the ionosphere”
causing- an ionospheric lift,
in- order
to- study methodically,
and- in a detailed manner
what- nature
produces- randomly and regularly
on- a much larger scale”.
That is only HAARP Alaska, however,
and that is only what they are telling us.
According- to the website,
there- are HAARP facilities
in- Latin America & Tajikistan,
about- which
nothing- is known
unlike- HAARP Alaska,
they are not open to selected members of the public
THIS MEANS that H.A.A.R.P. is FUNDED BY THEPENTAGON
contracted- to & designed
by - private war corporations,
developed- through America’s
DARPA - Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency
and- owned
by- the US Air Force &Navy –
yet- we are expected
to- believe
That - it is not a weaponized military application
This official position cannot be taken very seriously,
especially- given
that- those agencies
are- committed
to- “full spectrum dominance”
“The ionosphere is the part of the atmosphere between space and the earth
in- which electrically charged atoms, or ions,
reflect- radio waves,”
BAE explained in a news release,
making- long-distance
radio- communication possible”.
This is achieved by irradiating the ionosphere
in- order
to- send Extremely Low Frequency (ELF)
waves- down
to- submarines
and- other earthbound appliances.
According to HAARP,
it- is also designed
to- “x-ray”
the- earth
in- order
to- find
oil - gas, minerals,
hidden - submarines
&- subterranean bunkers
The tomographer Brooks Agnew explained how:
In- 1983
I - did tomography
with- 30 watts,
looking- for oil
in- the ground.
I found 26 oil wells over a nine State area,
and- 100%
of- the time
was - accurate,
with - just 30 watts
of- power beaming
straight - into solid rock.
The resulting vibrations
give- mineral
tomographers- information
about - what is
under- the surface.
HAARP, however,
by- its own admission,
uses- 3.6 million watts,
with- the aim
of- producing
an- apocalyptic 100 billion watts3
Testifyingto the European Parliament in 1998- the physicist Rosalie Bertell
described - the background
to- HAARP…
If radiation is projected into the ionosphere,
huge- amounts
of- energy
can- be generated
and- used
to- annihilate
a- given region…
[HAARP] enables communications to take place
with- submerged submarines
and can - in theory,
create- geomagnetic pathways
to- guide particle beams
which- could then
deposit- large amounts
of- energy
anywhere - on the globe
In - simpler terms,
HAARP - with its power
of- intimidation,
of- delivery
or- denial
of- electrical energy
on - a global scale
and - its control - of communications,
is- an element
of- a system
which- could control
the- global village
in- some frightening ways.
IN 1998 a EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT COMMITTEE
DEMANDED- THAT THE U.S. YIELD
ITS - H.A.A.R.P. SECRETS
OF COURSE - IT REFUSED TO DO
IN 1999, the EUROPEAN PALIAMENT’S COMMITTEE- on the…
ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION
published a Report on the Environment, Security and Foreign Policy, incorporating a Draft Resolution,
which read:
The military are developing ever more powerful weapons
which inflict- widespread & devastating damage on the environment.
A modern war entails greater environmental destruction
than any other-environment-destructive activity
[Article 27 of the Draft Resolution]
considers HAARP- by virtue of its far-reaching impact on the environment
to be a global concern- and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications
to be examined- by an international independent body before any further research and testing;
regrets the repeated refusal- of the United States administration [then Clinton's]
to send anyone in person- to give evidence to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting
held by its competent committee - into the environmental and public risks…
[HAARP] - could result in changes in weather patterns.
It could also influence whole ecosystems…
Another damaging consequence - of HAARP
is the occurrence - of holes in the ionosphere
caused - by the powerful radio beams.
The ionosphere protects us from incoming cosmic radiation.
The hope is that the holes - will fill again,
but- our experience of change
in- the ozone layer
points- in the other direction.
This means substantial holes in the ionosphere that protects us…
If - used
as - a military weapon
this- can have
a- devastating impact
on- an enemy.
HAARP can deliver millions of times more energy to a given area - than any other conventional transmitter
HAARP- has links
with- 50 years
of- intensive
space- research
for- military purposes
including the Star Wars project,
to- control
the- upper atmosphere
and- communications
This kind of research
has- to be regarded
as- a serious threat
to- the environment,
with- an incalculable impact
on- human life
Even now nobody knows what impact HAARP may have.
We- have
to- beat down
the- wall
of- secrecy
around- military research,
and set up the - right to openness & democratic scrutiny
of- military research projects,
and- parliamentary control.
The Resolution was delayed until 2003, and subsequently dismissed:
HAARP - “for Arctic Europe
is - a military program
The [European] Commission has no competence,
nor - indeed the expertise,
to- carry out the examination
requested - by the Parliament”
In other words, everyone got paid off and/or threatened.
In 2000 - Rosalie Bertell
informed- The Times (London)
that- America and Britain
are- working
on- weather systems
as- a potential weapon.
The methods include the enhancing
of- storms
and- the diverting
of- vapour rivers
in- the Earth’s atmosphere
to - produce targeted droughts or floods“,
which- the US Air Force
recommended- in 1996
and- the MoD
tacitly- reaffirmed
in- 2010
Bertell has also stated that
it would be rash not to associate HAARP with the space laboratory construction which is separately being planned by the United States…
The - ability
of - the HAARP, Spacelab, rocket
combination - to deliver
very- large amount
of - energy,
comparable - to a nuclear bomb,
anywhere - on earth
via - laser
and- particle beams
are- frightening
The project is likely to be “sold” to the public
as- a space shield
against- incoming weapons
or - for the more gullible
a- device
for- repairing
the- ozone layer
Or simply not mentioned at all.
The- topic
is- completely off
the- media agenda:
RokGolob, a social scientist at the University of Ljubljana, Slovenia,wrote
that- “[g]eophysical weapons today
is- a taboo topic
that - is often
only- superficially treated,”
going on to explain, rather ominously, how:
Geophysical weapons
are- an important aspect
of- the true integrity
of- modern warfare,
in - addition to all the most modern weapons
also- use
the- scheduler Earth
and- the natural processes
as- a weapon…
Many scientists believe that a possible cause
for ecological disasters
are- secret
and- unpunished
geophysical- weapons
in- use
This view is confirmed by a number of warnings
from- international organizations
such- as NATO,
the - International Committee of the Red Cross,
the official documents the Ukrainian and Russian parliament
on- the dangers
of- Geophysical weapons [and now the EU].
Zbigniew Brzezinski, former national security adviser to US President Carter, and J.F. McDonald, Science Advisor to Lyndon Johnson,
have- published
a- document
on- geophysical weapons,
which were described
as- having
the- real possibility
of- negative effects
on- the civilian population.
Compounding Golob’s research,
particularly- in relation
to- using
natural - cycles,
a Czech military intelligence article explained how,
Under - certain
meteorological - conditions
which - are constantly changing
but - they can be predicted
ionoféře - can “steal”
a- large amount
of- electromagnetic energy
that- is there
due- to ions
located- in difficult
to- imagine quantities”.
The resulting amount of electromagnetism can be directed
against- earthbound targets,
as- the EU commissions
have- warned,
making- it
the- ultimate weapon of mass destruction
According to a pro-HAARP article in Wired magazine, which otherwise dismisses all of the above as a conspiracy theory,
“A Russian military journal warned that blasting the ionosphere
would- trigger a cascade
of- electrons
that- could flip
the- Earth’s magnetic poles
“Simply speaking, the planet will ‘capsize’,” it warned.”
HAARP- is “so strong
it- could
trigger- earthquakes
And by dumping all those radio waves into the ionosphere,
HAARP- could turn
a- miles-wide
portion- of the upper atmosphere
into- a giant lens
On the subject of the “giant lens”,
shortly- before, the…
Haiti,
Chile,
China,
Japan,
and New Zealand
earthquakes- in 2010,
“strange lights” - were reported-in the skies above
many of those countries
these from the China earthquake in 2008
(seeVideo 1 and Video 2).
Writing about something else, Wired noted how,
At- about 125 miles up,
HAARP’s- waves
can- energize free electrons,
which- collide
with- neutral atoms
to- produce
a - glow like
the- aurora borealis
which- would explain
the- lights observed
prior- to the 2010 earthquakes
In- 2010
Haiti -which has been
subjected- to centuries
of- brutal French
and- American
colonial- intervention,
was - hit
by- a devastating earthquake
which- killed 200,000 people.
Russian Intelligence reported that
since- the end
of- the decade
of- the 70s
in- the last century,
the US “advanced a lot”
in- the state
of- its earthquake weapons
and - according to these reports -they now use equipment
with- Pulse, Plasma
& - Tesla Electromagnetic
& - Sonic technology
Together- with “shock wave bombs”.
This would be consistent with the “experiments”
conducted- by the psychopaths
at- HAARP.
According to the Russian report,
the- State Department, USAID and the US Southern Command
began- its work
of- “humanitarian invasion”
by- sending
at- least 10,000 soldiers and contractors,
to- control Haitian territory,
rather- than the UN,
after- the devastating
experimental earthquake”.
It should be noted that,
although Obama’s Quadrennial Defence Review 2010
does - not mention geophysical weapons
or - weather modification,
it - does clarify
the new doctrine of militarizing aid relief,
thereby- giving
the- US
a- pretext
to- occupy
a- given country
extreme - weather events
may - lead
to- increased demands
for - defence support
to- civil authorities
for- humanitarian assistance
or- disaster response
both- within
the- United States & overseas
One official source that does mention such weapons is the MoD’sStrategic Trends Programme 2010
which - states - that Directed Energy Weapons
will - be capable
of - discrete target discrimination,
producing - a strike beam
or - field of electromagnetic energy,
acoustic - energy
or - atomic scale particles
to - cause disruptive - or damaging effects,
at- near instantaneous speeds,
to- equipment,
infrastructure
or personnel.
They will [emphases in original] have widespread employment including:
hand- emplaced “suitcase” devices;
and- ground, sea and air-based systems,
with- applications
that- include engine disablement
and- infrastructure attack [emphasis added.
These are consistent with HAARP].
“As regards the final result of the tests of these weapons,
the [Russian Northern Fleet] report warns that there is a US plan to destroy Iran through a series of earthquakes”.
“It can’t reach Iran, if that’s your question,” quipped one of HAARP’s developers, “Dennis Papadopoulos” – not his real name – speaking to Wired.
This statement, buried at the end of an otherwise propagandistic article,
is a tacit admission that HAARP is indeed a weapon,
otherwise why say such a thing?
“Papadopoulos” added: “But if I put HAARP on a ship, or on an oil platform, who knows?”6
Why would “Papadopoulos” and his psychopathic colleagues need to put a HAARP facility on a sea platform when they could establish a HAARP facility in a country near to the one they wish to destroy?
Contrary to the HAARP Alaska facility, which is partly open to the public, there are numerous HAARP facilities, according to the official website, one of which is in Tajikistan, which is near Iran and borders China.
This is in keeping with the statement of “Papadopoulos” about building a facility near Iran in order to “reach”it.
Furthermore, Britain’s Ministry of Defence had already written about using unspecified new weapons (possibly neutron) in “outfacing irresponsible nuclear powers and in opposing demographically strong nations”.
The most “demographically strong nation” is China.
Afghanistan separates China from Iran, and is occupied by Britain and America.
Tajikistan, which borders Afghanistan and China, is close enough for a HAARP facility, assuming “Papadopoulos” is right,
in order to attack China (which suffered an earthquake and flood in 2010), and to attack Iran, especially given Tajikistan’s poverty, lack of defence, and weak government.
As noted above, HAARP Alaska’s website explained how
All of these installations have as their primary purpose the study of the ionosphere, and most employ the capability of stimulating to a varying degree small, localized regions of the ionosphere in order to study methodically, and in a detailed manner what nature produces randomly and regularly on a much larger scale.
In other words, HAARP can and does cause natural disasters
they claim on a miniscule level and “to a varying degree”.
Not wanting to limit their deterrence capabilities, the Russians have built several HAARP facilities.
As the US Air Force noted in 1996, the “beauty” of “owning the weather” and mastering “the science of chaos” is that nobody can prove if the given event is anthropogenic or not.
Added to which, Obama announced an increase in US exports at a time when Russia is banning exports after its unprecedented droughts in 2010.
Wreck another country’s economy with a weather weapon,
and- force it to borrow
from- the IMF (as we have seen with Pakistan),
in- order to get them to purchase American exports.
The circumstantial evidence is getting too much to ignore
In 2010, we have had:
A - “sink hole” form in the ground in Guatemala;
Landslides - in Guatemala and Italy;
severe- droughts in Russia;
forest fires- in Russia and Bolivia;
floods- in China, Taiwan, Pakistan, Niger and Mexico;
a- hurricane which missed Mexico;
a- hurricane which hit Burma;
a- volcanic eruption in Iceland;
and- earthquakes
in- Haiti, Chile, China, Japan, Ne Zealand
added to which Britain’s Ministry of Defence anticipates
how- new technologies
could- create “disastrous outcomes, planned & unplanned”
note the word planned –
the- culmination
of- which
is- a “doomsday scenario”
meaning- “the end of the world,
or- at least
of- humanity”.
What use is “full spectrum dominance”
if there is nothing left to dominate?
Notes
1. Shachtman, N., “Strange New Air Force Facility Energizes Ionosphere, Fans Conspiracy Flames”, Wired, Issue 17, No. 8, 20 July 2009. This has subsequently disappeared from the internet, but if you type the quotes into a search engine, you can find traces of it from Wired’s “Danger Room”, etc.
2. Brooks Agnew interviewed in Wendy Robbins (director) and Paula Randol-Smith (co-producer), 1998, Holes in Heaven? HAARP and Advances in Tesla Technology. Robbins’s film is very informative, hence very well hidden, and actually contains interviews with HAARP maniacs who essentially admit they do not know what they are doing. Her film is serious and very different from the popular CBC broadcast film on HAARP, which can be found at here. Needless to say, there are massive efforts to make all of this seem like a conspiracy theory, hence the Canadian film shows activists in shadow, making the whole thing seem like science fiction. Added to which, HAARP is also the subject of another propaganda film by former Navy SEAL-turned-pro-wrestler Jesse Ventura – clearly another effort to undermine serious discussion. Furthermore, HAARP has been the subject of X Files episodes and Marvel Comics, as well as Wired magazine’s dismissals of its opponents as “tinfoil-hatted lunatics”. The propaganda trying to undermine the serious discussion about HAARP is disgraceful, but, considering the kind of world we live in, completely predicable.
3. Official documents cited in Nick Begich and Jeane Manning, Angels Don’t Play This HAARP (Anchorage: Earthpulse Press).
4. Shachtman, N., “Strange New Air Force Facility Energizes Ionosphere”.
5. Shachtman, N., “Strange New Air Force Facility Energizes Ionosphere”.
6. Shachtman, N., “Strange New Air Force Facility Energizes Ionosphere”.
7. Shachtman, N., “Strange New Air Force Facility Energizes Ionosphere”.
* Tim Coles is a writer and filmmaker.
No comments:
Post a Comment