CONFIRMED:
US Claims Against Syria –
There
is no Evidence
August 28, 2013
(Tony Cartalucci) - The Wall Street Journal has confirmed what many suspected,
that the West's so-called "evidence" of the latest alleged "chemical attacks" in
Syria, pinned on the Syrian government are fabrications spun up from the West's
own dubious intelligence agencies.
The Wall Street
Journal reveals that the US is citing claims from Israel's Mossad intelligence
agency fed to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), a repeat of the
fabrications that led up to the Iraq War, the Libyan War, and have been used now
for 3 years to justify continued support of extremists operating within and
along Syria's borders.
Wall Street
Journal's article, "U.S., Allies Prepare to Act as Syria Intelligence Mounts,"
states:
One crucial piece
of the emerging case came from Israeli spy services, which provided the Central
Intelligence Agency with intelligence from inside an elite special Syrian unit
that oversees Mr. Assad's chemical weapons, Arab diplomats said. The
intelligence, which the CIA was able to verify, showed that certain types of
chemical weapons were moved in advance to the same Damascus suburbs where the
attack allegedly took place a week ago, Arab diplomats said.
Both Mossad and the
CIA are clearly compromised in terms of objectivity and legitimacy. Neither
exists nor is expected to provide impartial evidence, but rather to facilitate
by all means necessary the self-serving agendas, interests, and objectives of
their respective governments.
That both Israel
and the United States, as far back as 2007 have openly conspired together to
overthrow the government of Syria through a carefully engineered sectarian
bloodbath, discredits entirely their respective intelligence agencies. This is
precisely why an impartial, objective third-party investigation has been called
for by the international community and agreed upon by the Syrian government - a
third-party investigation the US has now urged to be canceled ahead of its
planned military strikes.
The Wall Street
Journal reports:
In an email on
Sunday, White House National Security Adviser Susan Rice told U.N. Ambassador
Samantha Power and other top officials that the U.N. mission was pointless
because the chemical weapons evidence already was conclusive, officials said.
The U.S. privately urged the U.N. to pull the inspectors out, setting the stage
for President Barack Obama to possibly move forward with a military response,
officials said.
The US then, not
Syria, is attempting a coverup, with fabrications in place from discredited,
compromised intelligence sources and the threat of impending military strikes
that would endanger the UN inspection team's safety should they fail to end
their investigation and withdraw.
The Wall Street
Journal also reiterated that the US is planning to fully sidestep the UN
Security Council and proceed with its partners unilaterally:
...if the U.S.
chose to strike, it would do so with allies and without the U.N., in order to
sidestep an expected Russian veto.
The US proceeds now
with absolute disregard for international law, all but declaring it has no
intention of providing credible evidence of its accusations against the Syrian
government. It is a rush to war with all the hallmarks of dangerous desperation
as the West's proxy forces collapse before the Syrian military. Western military
leaders must consider the strategic tenants and historical examples regarding
the dangers and folly of haste and imprudence in war - especially war fought to
protect special interests and political agendas rather than to defend territory.
The populations of
the West must likewise consider what benefits they have garnered from the last
decade of military conquest their leaders have indulged in. Crumbling economies
gutted to feed the preservation of special interests and the growing domestic
security apparatuses to keep these interests safe from both domestic and foreign
dissent are problems that will only grow more acute.
Outside of the
West, in Moscow, Beijing, and Tehran, leaders must consider a future where
Western special interests can invade with impunity, without public support, or
even the tenuous semblance of justification being
necessary.
No comments:
Post a Comment