Saturday, February 28, 2015

CAFR accounts to see what they Dont Tell you




Sent: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:06:46 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Fwd: Article 22 pages: The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report , CAFR or How They Hide the Money-If you don't know about CAFR accounts here is a chance to see what they Dont Tell you...B:/

 Tue, 24 Feb 2015 04:05:09
-0800 (PST)

Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 06:05:09 -0600

Subject: Article 22 pages: The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report ,
CAFR or

 How They Hide the Money

From: Arden Gifford <cococo26@gmail.com>

THE COMPREHENSIVE

ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT

CAFR

OR HOW THEY HIDE THE MONEY

Â

022415

Â


Â

Search for

 _TEXT_

Â

To go to original text and the attachments for
full report. The last pages have “for some reason� been censored I
believe.

Â
[Ed Note: Briefly overview the CAFR was formed after all the cities
counties states and federal government became corporations and dissolved
their previous “constitutional� base. 1933.

Â
From FDR time forward the Citizens became indentured servants and
through debt were debt slaves not for seven years with 7 acres and mule
tax free, but lifetime pledged corporate assets to the pledge against the
national debt. For a corporation to declare brand ownership it
CAPITALIZES it rather than Upper Lower Case. From then on our names John
Doe became JOHN DOE on Birth Certificates and licenses and all federal
state records. We have the same “rights� under the “constitution�
as a washer KENMORE on the floor of SEARS, none. That is all public
consumption PsyOp.

Â
The various CAFRs thus formed are reputed to have ownership control of
a majority stock of the entire NYC stock exchange. A simple short sale
and dumping of stock will bankrupt any size corporation faster than a
hijacker with a box cutter on 911.  That is followed by usually a
criminal conviction for the principles who had the hubris to challenge
the system. “They are not big enough to box with God�.

Â
The collective CAFR organization have enough money to pay for all the
services of the federal and state governments entirely with no collection
taxes at all. Taxes go to a private corporation the usual is IRS there
are others located in Puerto Rico a International organization to return
the money to the true owners the Central Committee. They in turn fund the
IMF/WORLD BANK with fiat money from the Federal Reserve.

Â
When selected private individuals are selected to receive benefits,
they are the recipient of “investments� by the CAFRs which have no
oversight except the Central Committee. Covert subsidies to judges,
public officials, election campaigns and those participating in
demographic management will be subsidized handsomely as long as they play
the game.

Â
A separate category is thefalse flag “Raison d’
Etat�
patterns that
have the largest support to justify military invasion of countries to
"rescue" them from the violent abusive powers
they are funded to become. Some of the members of this group are
supporters of WWAM, World Wide Attack Matrix of 80 countries from PNAC
George W. Bush / Dick Cheney Feb 2001
'plato y
plomo'
[quote Pablo Escobar]
e.g. 'my silver or my lead'  for   Foreign Aide or Shock and Awe.
Also including not limited to for example:

Â

·        Adolf Hitler

·        Lenin

·        Stalin

·        Ho Chi Minh [CIA agent 19]

·        Osama bin Laden [largest funded CIA agent in
history]


·        ISIS

·        Various big/small false flag operations for
passing military or strong right wing legislation or both. They have been
on increase in 2001 following the election to Executive offices members
of the Project for New American Century, who are now running for office
again. 

Â
States that refuse to join the international Central Bank cartels of
fiat money and print debt free gold backed money are considered
“rogue� states and are attacked usually for non-compliance to nuclear
proliferation. As soon as compliant, they are given CC agents for the
leadership role and funded with economic and military support

Â
In brief, the CAFR is a cash cow for any group of individuals that can
and will support the general agenda of the CC and have their private
fortunes enriched privately and secretly by the CAFR.

Â
During this time the medical institution and facilities have been
given electronic records logged in real time to NSA and then 600
federal/state/corporate offices to create real time confidential
informant status [CI] from cradle to grave of everyone permanently.
Subsequently toxic food GMO, free promotions of toxic vaccination, “End
of Life� Affidavits promotions, ‘clinical trials’ , and the central
$ 3 billion dollar cash cow for the system and resulting in trillions of
unfunded entitlements the lacing of tobacco with radioactive isotope
Polonium 210 detonation trigger for nuclear devices, known in general
parlance as “enriched uranium�, together with Zyklon B cyanide, and
systematic premeditated murder of unborn children by the millions, all of
which including not limited to above is variations of
MEDICIDE, e.g. demographic management the
central core agenda of CC since 1952. 

Â
Arden Gifford, MD]

Â

DISCLAIMER

Â
The views, opinions or data is presented for educational purposes only
for your review and awareness. The validity qualifications and
presentation is subject to your reply and comment and test of time to be
pending updates for more accuracy. The data presented  is neither
in the intent of commercial advocacy nor governmental indoctrination but
portions of the truth that may or may not stand the test of time for the
core of these posts, predictability for ourselves and our family.

Â
For privacy all posts are sent BCC: so that your email is secure. If
the same post is returned to author it reflects the distribution to those
willing to receive the data. These posts are solely the views of the
presenter, unless qualified with editorial notes in italics. Otherwise,
they are their  own and necessarily do not represent confirmation the
views or opinions.

Â
Arden Gifford, MD.

Â
If you do not wish to receive these posts write
REMOVE on a REPLY to the office and your name will be DELETED.
Limitations of time preclude censoring categories for your preferences at
this time.




[]

[]


Making a difference one person at a time

Get informed. Inform others

continuing the work for a better world
Please help and support
the work and writing of Biophilos for Enlightenment and Humanity.....any
and all donations are

welcome.
http://biophilos.weebly.com/

http://biophilo.tripod.com/stavro

your Financial Help in order for me to continue my work is greatly
appreciated.
[]

[]
send check, or money to me via mail:

John Gavalas,2450 Niki Jo Lane,

Palm Beach Gardens, Florida,33410

any amount is accepted with gratitude.


" the widest gate of Deliverance is Action"

 Nikos Kazantzakis


To move the world, we must first move ourselves"

Socrates


" Ye shall know the Truth and the Truth shall make you
FREE"

Christ

BiophilosCopyright ©

to UNSUBSCRIBE no problem. Send to
biophilo@bellsouth.net with your request.

as soon as possible your privacy will be honored.




[]


The AirAsia Search: Positive Precedent for Future Cooperation

RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical issues and contemporary developments. The views of the authors are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced electronically or in print with prior permission from RSIS and due recognition to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email: RSISPublications@ntu.edu.sg for feedback to the Editor RSIS Commentary, Yang Razali Kassim. 


No. 039/2015 dated 27 February 2015
The AirAsia Search:
Positive Precedent for Future Cooperation
By Henrick Z. Tsjeng

Synopsis


The search for AirAsia Flight 8501 has been largely commended as a success. While not without obstacles, the multilateral efforts led by host country Indonesia contributed to a smooth search. This success can be a positive precedent for future cooperation.

Commentary


THE MULTINATIONAL effort to locate the crashed Indonesia AirAsia Flight QZ8501 and recover victims has been largely commended as a success. Both “black boxes” – the cockpit voice recorder and flight data recorder – have been recovered and investigations are well under way as to what caused the tragic crash of the plane en route from Surabaya to Singapore.

Vessels and aircraft from several countries have participated in the search, with the Information Fusion Centre, located in Singapre’s Changi Naval Base, assisting in coordination efforts. Apart from the Indonesian Navy (TNI-AL) and the National Search and Rescue Agency (BASARNAS), the international contributors, other than Singapore, included Australia, China, Malaysia, the United States and Russia. The countries involved deployed maritime and air assets, including ships with sonar scanners and diving teams.

Factors in favour of QZ 8501 search

The QZ8501 search operation has been relatively free from the mass confusion and finger-pointing generated during the search for Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 earlier last year, and is a positive step forward for future cooperation should the need arise again.

A major reason for the success of the search-and-locate (SAL) operation for QZ 8501 and the ensuing investigation were the relatively conducive conditions for the recovery of debris and victims, not least the “black boxes” which contain information critical for ascertaining the cause of the crash. There were no known drastic deviations in flight path, and the last reported location of the plane was in an area of shallow waters and within a confined sea space. The circumstances surrounding MH370’s disappearance were exactly the opposite. Even if these factors were independent of the efficacy of the search efforts by various regional countries, they nonetheless contributed towards a relatively successful international effort.

This is not to say that the search operation has been without setbacks. For instance, bad weather and rough seas slowed the operation, especially at the beginning phase of the search. Moreover, the TNI and BASARNAS were releasing conflicting data at the initial stage of the search as a result of internal coordination issues, which were addressed once President Joko Widodo took on a coordinating role. Nonetheless, the AirAsia search illustrates further the extent to which regional multilateral cooperation has improved since the disappearance of MH370 which lost contact on 8 March last year.
Effective coordination and transparency
   
Firstly, the SAL effort by Indonesia appeared to have been effectively coordinated and was transparent. The Indonesian authorities were quick to produce a search plan which also saw requests for assistance to Australia, Malaysia, Singapore and the United States, among others, and the country was also forthcoming with accepting international assistance.

The TNI and BASARNAS, after overcoming initial communication issues, closely coordinated with its foreign counterparts, who brought debris and bodies to the Indonesians when found. This was in stark contrast to the chaotic situation that prevailed in the first hours of the disappearance of MH370, which saw many actions taken that were eventually deemed counterproductive to the search, including searches in the South China Sea during the initial phases.

The QZ8501 search also saw more transparency, especially on the part of the Indonesian government. In contrast to the opacity and confusion that characterised the first several hours after MH370 was first reported missing, the Indonesian authorities were more forthcoming in providing information to the parties involved in the search, after the initial internal coordination issues were addressed.

No politicisation of search effort

Moreover, the search did not see any dramatic politicisation of the incident. In the case of MH370, the tragedy quickly became a thorny political issue, with blame-shifting rife on many sides. China was fiercely vocal in its criticism of Malaysia, particularly because the majoritty of the MH370 passengers were Chinese nationals. As a result, the incident became a sticking point in Sino-Malaysia relations, though Malaysia on its part was prudent not to escalate its differences with China.

In the multinational SAL effort for QZ8501, there was an incident that could have derailed the collaboration. About a week after the plane first disappeared, Indonesia deployed the KRI Usman Harun in the search. The vessel is controversial as it was embroiled in a political row between Singapore and Indonesia over its name. Nonetheless, Singapore’s Ministry of Defence responded by saying that the Singapore Armed Forces will “continue to assist in this search effort professionally”.

Both countries did not allow this issue to overshadow their close multilateral cooperation, which continued without any further notable incidents. Notably, the search was conducted wholly within Indonesian waters, which left Singapore with little reason to protest. The Singaporean vessel, MV Swift Rescue, eventually went on to locate the main fuselage of the wreckage. This demonstrated an important point – that political goodwill can overcome contentions and ease the way for greater multilateral cooperation, whether in the maritime sphere or elsewhere.

The presence of American, Chinese and Russian vessels dispatched to assist in the SAL operations demonstrated the willingness of the involved countries to set aside political differences and disputes during cooperation, contribute their assets in the search for the downed plane, and in doing so build goodwill with host nation Indonesia and the other countries involved.

Way forward
 
The search for QZ8501 marks a break from past experiences in the region in which considerations over sovereignty, national security and political differences dampened such willingness among certain parties to cooperate or accept international assistance, as was seen in the search for MH370, as well as the multilateral relief operations for Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines and Cyclone Nargis in Myanmar.

The search for QZ8501 is a significant step forward for the region towards deeper maritime engagement and cooperation in search operations. It is particularly helpful for building the ASEAN Community, as well as for overcoming obstacles such as the lack of regional support for the Search-and-Rescue Convention and the need to harmonise international air and maritime search-and-rescue regimes.

Even though national considerations that may hamper multilateral cooperation are unlikely to vanish overnight, the goodwill arising from the multilateral search for the AirAsia plane will likely set a positive precedent for future SAL operations.

Henrick Z. Tsjeng is an Associate Research Fellow with the Maritime Security Programme of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University.
Click HERE to read this commentary online.

Debt, Deficits, and the Death of the Dollar


Debt, Deficits, and the Death of the Dollar
By Jason Simpkins | Friday, February 6th, 2015
The dollar has been strong recently, no doubt.
But don't get conned into believing this short-term strength equates to long-term stability.
The fact is, the dollar is still doomed. It just so happens that, at the moment, other fiat currencies are looking worse.
It's all relative. The dollar only looks good when you compare it to other flawed currencies, like the euro or yen. But at the end of the day, it's still just a debt instrument — and one that's increasingly at risk.
Because we're so busy celebrating our emergence from the 2008 financial crisis, we've lost sight of the debt and deficits that are steadily building.
Basically, we're digging a hole that's much bigger than the one we're supposedly climbing out of.
Nothing is Free
What you have to understand is that a strong dollar is a double-edged sword.
It makes commodities cheaper and it increases U.S. purchasing power. But it also makes our exports more expensive for other countries. And it makes our debt harder to finance.
Case-in-point: The U.S. trade deficit rose 17.1% in December, hitting a two-year high of $46.6 billion.
Exports fell 0.8% to $194.9 billion, while imports increased 2.2% to a record $241.4 billion.
In fact, the import-export gap between the United States and China and the EU — its two biggest trading partners — is the biggest it's ever been.

The deficit with China rose by 23.9% to a record $342.6 billion. And the deficit with the EU jumped 12.5% to a record $141.1 billion.
For all of 2014, the total U.S. trade gap widened 6% to $505 billion, potentially shaving 1% off of GDP growth.
This trend is poised to accelerate, and not just because of the dollar.
There's also the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), which could be ratified later this year.
The TPP is a free trade agreement with 12 U.S. trade partners in the Pacific Rim. It would lower tariffs on U.S. exports, but it would also push for more privatization and deregulation abroad.
That opens up the door for Western multinationals to transfer their operations overseas, where labor and resources are cheaper.
This, of course, is the notorious failure of NAFTA, an agreement that has cost the U.S. more than 1 million jobs over the past 20 years and exacerbated our trade deficit.
For instance, maybe you've wondered why so many car companies have manufacturing plants in Mexico...
Well, when NAFTA was passed, U.S. car companies, like General Motors, set up manufacturing plants in Mexico where land and labor come cheap. Then they simply imported their vehicles back into the United States at no cost. Other foreign companies, like Kia, Nissan, and Mercedes did the same.
Prior to NAFTA the U.S. actually had a trade surplus with Mexico and a trade deficit with Canada of just $26 billion. Now, our combined deficit with both those countries exceeds $177 billion.
The same is true of the Permanent Normal Trade Relations agreement with China, which cost some 2.7 million U.S. jobs.
Basically, all these free trade agreements do is lure U.S. companies overseas, where they can evade taxes, skirt labor laws, duck environmental regulation, and sell our goods back to us at a higher profit.
That's good for U.S. multinationals and the people who run them, but not much else. And it's certainly bad for the country's balance sheet. These agreements siphon off tax revenue, reduce exports, increase imports, and destroy jobs.
Combined with a stronger dollar, which makes U.S. exports more expensive, the end result is larger trade deficits and more borrowing.
And we're only talking about the annual trade/budget deficit here. When you zoom out and look at the totality of the national debt, it's an even scarier picture.
__._,_.___

'Jihadi John': Prime minister defends security services

SOL: Of course they allowed "Jihadi John" to travel back and forth because the British U.S. and Israel need him to perform these extreme acts of violence to enrage the Brits and Americans enough to support their government's war against these "Islamic State terrorist" that we both created to serve THEIR needs for regime changes. Jihadi John's identity was known all along by The British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS, or MI6), our CIA and the Mossad as they all were using him to further their agenda for regime changes that would favor Israel. You don't see these revelations in to U.S. media but much of the "foreign press" has said for some time that the leaders of the IS terrorist have British and North American accents and 'WE" are regularly air dropping weapons, war supplies food and vehicles to IS to keep them going. Iraq just shot down two British planes that were air dropping supplies to IS and the weapons being used by IS are from the U.S., British and Israeli. The whole world has knows this. Just read the Independent foreign press. There are always two sides to every issue. each side has its own perspective and agenda and somewhere in between is the truth. If you read ALL SIDES of any given issue long enough (without blinders) you will begin to see where the truth lies. Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Kurds and Iran are the only ones that are effectively beating IS and even the Ayatollah Khomeini, the Supreme Islamist leader in Iran, emphatically stated that IS is the enemy of Islam and are NOT Islamist.



27 February 2015 Last updated at 09:43 ET

'Jihadi John': Prime minister defends security services

Jihadi John without knifeMohammed Emwazi pictured as a young boy and as IS militant "Jihadi John"
The prime minister has defended the security services amid criticisms they failed to stop Mohammed Emwazi, known as "Jihadi John'", from joining Islamic State in Syria.
David Cameron said the security services made "incredibly difficult judgements" on the UK's behalf.
His comments came after it emerged Emwazi was known to authorities.
The PM said he would not comment on specific cases but urged the public to back the security services.
The masked Islamic State militant known as "Jihadi John", who has been pictured in the videos of the beheadings of Western hostages, was identified this week as a Kuwaiti-born British man, in his mid-20s and from west London.
Emwazi first appeared in a video last August, when he apparently killed the US journalist James Foley.
He was later thought to have been pictured in the videos of the beheadings of British aid worker David Haines, US journalist Steven Sotloff, British taxi driver Alan Henning, and American aid worker Abdul-Rahman Kassig, also known as Peter.
Journalists gathered outside a home in west London where Mohammed Emwazi is believed to have once livedJournalists gathered outside a home in London where Mohammed Emwazi is believed to have once lived
BBC security correspondent Frank Gardner told Radio 4's Today programme there were questions about how "someone on a terror watch list, somebody of real concern, was able to slip out of this country and turn up in Syria like that unhindered".
UK-based advocacy group Cage has suggested that MI5 may have contributed to the radicalisation of Emwazi.
Downing Street said the claim was "completely reprehensible", while London mayor Boris Johnson described Cage's comments as "an apology for terror".
'Vast effort'
Mr Cameron defended the security services, praising the work of "these extraordinary men and women".
He said: "I meet with them regularly, I ask them searching questions about what they do and in my almost five years' experience as prime minister, I think they are incredibly impressive, hard-working, dedicated, courageous and effective at protecting our country.
"All of the time, they are having to make incredibly difficult judgements and I think basically they make very good judgements on our behalf, and I think whilst we are in the middle of this vast effort to make sure British citizens are safe, the most important thing is to get behind them."
Mr Cameron went on to say the security services' "dedication and work has saved us from plots on the streets of the UK that could have done us immense damage" within the last few months.
Emwazi is believed to have lived in this address in London Emwazi is believed to have lived at this address in west London
Police and TV crews outside an address in London where Emwazi is believed to have livedPolice have been patrolling outside the property
Police on patrol outside the property in London where Emwazi is thought to have livedDavid Cameron praised the security forces for their work
Mr Johnson said it did renew the argument about control orders - a form of house arrest for terrorist suspects - which were abolished by the coalition government in 2012 and replaced with Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures (TPims).
"It is vital when you are controlling these people to be able to relocate them, to take them away from their support networks and to monitor them properly," he said.
"The politicians who made that mistake need to think very carefully about why they did it and I think the benefit of the doubt was given too much to those who wish us serious harm."
David Anderson, the government's independent reviewer of terror legislation, said it was difficult not to have sympathy with the security services "when you see just how many cases they have to look at".
"A lot of people talk a good game when it comes to terrorism. The knack is identifying the few who are going to do something about it."
line
Mohammed Emwazi's movements before heading to Syria
Map showing 'Jihadi John's' movements ahead of his travel to Syria
  • 1. Aug 2009, refused entry to Tanzania: travels to Tanzania with two friends, but is refused entry at Dar es Salaam. Tanzanian police have denied Emwazi's name is on their database of suspected foreign criminals detained and deported in 2009, as he had claimed. Emwazi and his friends are put on flight to Amsterdam, where they are questioned. They return to Dover and are questioned again.
  • 2. Sept 2009, travels to Kuwait for work: leaves the UK for Kuwait for work.
  • 3. May/June 2010, returns to UK for holiday: he returns to the UK for an eight-day visit.
  • 4. July 2010, refused re-entry to Kuwait: Emwazi returns to the UK once more for a couple of days. He is stopped at Heathrow on his return to Kuwait and told he cannot travel as his visa has expired.
  • 5. 2013, travels to Syria: Emwazi changes his name to Mohammed al-Ayan and attempts to travel to Kuwait but is stopped and questioned. Three days later, he heads abroad. Police later inform his family he has travelled to Syria.
The masked militant first appeared in numerous gruesome videos put out by Islamic State, as Lucy Manning reports
Emwazi has appeared in videos dressed in a black robe with a black balaclava covering all but his eyes and top of his nose.
Speaking with a British accent, he taunted Western powers before holding his knife to the hostages' necks, appearing to start cutting before the film stopped. The victims' decapitated bodies were then shown.
Earlier this month, a video in which the Japanese journalist Kenji Goto appeared to be beheaded featured the militant.
Hostages released by IS said he was one of three British jihadists guarding Westerners abducted by the group in Syria.
Families have given mixed reactions to the militant being named, with the mother of Mr Foley saying she forgave Emwazi; while Mr Haines's daughter, Bethany, said she wanted to see "a bullet between his eyes".
Emwazi is believed to have travelled to Syria around 2013 and later joined IS, which has declared the creation of a "caliphate" in the large swathes of Syria and neighbouring Iraq it controls.
British police have not commented on the identity of the militant known as "Jihadi John", citing ongoing inquiries.
line
Jihadi John sightings
  • August 2014: Video in which US journalist James Foley is apparently beheaded
  • 2 September 2014: Video in which US journalist Steve Sotloff is apparently beheaded
  • 13 September 2014: Video in which British aid worker David Haines is apparently beheaded
  • October 2014: Video in which British aid worker Alan Henning is apparently beheaded
  • November 2014: Video in which Jihadi John is shown killing a Syrian soldier in a mass beheading, which also shows body of US aid worker Abdul-Rahman Kassig, also known as Peter Kassig
  • 20 January 2015: Video in which Jihadi John is seen standing alongside two Japanese hostages and demanding a ransom in exchange for their release
  • 31 January 2015: Video released appearing to show Jihadi John beheading Japanese hostage Kenji Goto
line

What’s Behind Ukraine’s Secret Weapons Deal with the United Arab Emirates (UAE)?



What’s Behind Ukraine’s Secret Weapons Deal with the United Arab Emirates (UAE)?

Global Research, February 25, 2015
 740 
  63  19 
 
  1936
ukraine drapeau animé

U.S. President Barack Obama apparently is going ahead with his plan for NATO missiles to be placed in Ukraine aimed against Moscow, but found a way to do it that won’t violate the warnings by Russia’s President Vladimir Putin against Washington’s directly supplying those arms to Ukraine (such as is demanded of Obama by congressional Republicans, and even by a few hawkish Democrats — all passionate supporters of Hillary Clinton). Obama’s subordinate (or dependent local leader), the President of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko, is now arranging to receive those weapons via a less direct channel; and this arrangement couldn’t happen if the U.S. White House were opposed to it. The idea might even have originated inside the White House.
On Tuesday, 24 February 2015, in Abu Dhabi, the capital of United Arab Emirates, Poroshenko placed the finishing touches on the purchase of Western, mainly U.S., weapons, via the UAE, from Western firms such as, perhaps, Lockheed, GE, Krupp, Euromissile, etc., which will be paid for by Western taxpayers, via IMF ‘loans’ to Ukraine, which money comes from taxpayer contributions to the IMF, but which ‘loans’ can never be paid back to the IMF — they’ll inevitably default, because these ‘loans’ are at the very end of the long line of creditors of Ukraine, which is a bankrupt country, having been looted for decades (and especially during the past year) by its aristocrats (called “oligarchs”), who have already spirited tens if not hundreds of billions of dollars off to Western tax-haven countries, so that only Ukraine’s public (who received little if any benefit from those debts of the Ukrainian Government) will pay even the pennies-on-the-dollars that Ukraine’s bondholders will be receiving (and the recipients will be only the holders of the oldest of Ukraine’s bonds, which won’t be the IMF, EU, or U.S., Ukraine’s post-coup ‘lenders’).
This is called the IMF’s “austerity” program, for looted nations such as Greece and Ukraine, and it holds sacred the thefts by aristocrats, while it transfers all of aristocrats’ losses off onto their respective publics, who (as Ukrainians now will) pay it via their stripped governmental services and hiked taxes; and these poor people then serve aristocrats as virtual slaves (low-wage labor), many of whom thus migrate to wealthier countries, which, in turn, reject the burden of caring for them, thus producing yet more resentments and hatreds against these poor people, regardless of how they behave.
Here is the way this Ukrainian arms deal works:
The deal itself was publicly, but only vaguely, announced on Tuesday, the 24th, along with “what Poroshenko described as a ‘very important negotiation about the facilitation of the United Arab Emirates investment in the Ukraine.’ He declined to provide specifics of the deal.” The reason why Arabic royals (in this case the Al Nahyan family that controls Abu Dhabi) are naturals for this — the logical persons to serve as the middle-men to sell Western-made weapons to Russia’s new (since the time of Obama’s February 2014 Ukrainian coup) enemy, Ukraine — is that the U.S. aristocracy has, for at least 70 years, been allied with Sunni aristocracies, against, originally, the Soviet Union, and then Russia. Russia had been the chief supplier of oil and gas to the other Soviet republics; it was and is the local oil-and-gas giant. Whereas Russia’s aristocrats bonded instead with Shia Iran (which alliance was interrupted during 1953-79 by the CIA’s coup there and then the Shah’s ultimate overthrow and then the restoration of Iran’s alliance with Russia), the American aristocrats had bonded with Sunni Saudi Arabia, and with other Arab royals, in UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, etc. So, with the exception of Armand Hammer’s Occidental Petreoleum, which bonded with Libya’s pro-Soviet Sunni anti-imperialist and anti-Western Muammar Gaddafi, Western oil companies generally allied with the Saud family, who had allied with the most intensely Sunni clergy of all, who were the followers of Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, who had personally agreed in 1744, with Muhammad bin Saud, that the Sauds and Wahhabs would jointly control the Kingdom and ultimately the world — Wahhabs controlling the laws, and Sauds controlling the military.
In short: America’s aristocracy bonded with Sunni aristocrats, and Russia’s aristocracy bonded with Shia ones. Ukraine has now joined the Sunni alliance, and this is done with Obama’s blessing.
America’s progressives might find it hard to understand, but America’s far-right aristocratic Koch brothers, who are allied with Big Oil on almost everything else, have no part in Big Oil’s alliance with the Sauds, and consequently the Kochs’ Cato Institute actually did an honest analysis of U.S.-Saudi relations, concluding,
“The United States should reassess the current Washington-Riyadh axis. The American commitment to the Saudi royal family is a moral blemish and a practical danger. It has already drawn the United States into one conventional war and has helped to make Americans targets for terrorism, which generated far more casualties in one day than did the Gulf War, the Kosovo conflict, and the Afghanistan campaign (so far) combined.”
Instead, most of America’s aristocrats who are heavily invested in crushing Russia are Democrats, such as George Soros and Pierre Omidyar. These are the CIA Democrats. Another example of that is Markos Moulitsas. Of course, CIA Republicans dominate the anti-Russian campaign, but virtually the entire U.S. aristocracy is either funding it or else doesn’t much care either way about it. None cares about the extermination of the residents in Ukraine’s former Donbass region. This is why the U.S. media are now pouring forth with virtual unanimity against Russia — as if it were Russia that were surrounding NATO, instead of NATO that’s surrounding Russia. Even though Obama’s Ukrainian Government is carrying out an ethnic-cleansing campaign, its victims are being portrayed as if they were ‘terrorists’ and even ‘Russians.’ The victims are just former Ukrainians.
On 11 February 2015, I headlined “Al Qaeda’s Bookkeeper Spills the Beans” and reported that the person who had kept the financial books for Osama bin Laden’s Al Qaeda during the period leading up to 9/11, and who entered each and every donation into their financial books, including each one of the many multi-million-dollar donations, which poured in from Saudi and other Arab royals, provided sworn testimony recently, in a U.S. prison where he has been held incommunicado for more than a decade in order to protect Saudi and other Sunni royals — testimony that he swore upon the Quran, which he holds dearer than anything else — and, in this sworn testimony he explained in detail the profound interdependency between the Wahhab clergy and the Saud family, and the resulting dependency that Al Qaeda had upon both that clergy and that royal family, so that even the other Sunni royal families (such as in Qatar, Bahrain, and UAE) are beholden to the Saudi royal family and its Wahhabist clerics.
In other words: the U.S. aristocracy’s allliance with the Sauds explains an important part of the reason why the U.S. Government’s explanation of 9/11 is based upon lies.
A little-noticed news story in Al-Monitor, on 27 January 2015, from Bruce Reidel, reported that, “ Feb. 14 marks the 70th anniversary of the beginning of the US alliance with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. On Feb. 14, 1945, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt met with King Abdul-Aziz bin Abdul Rahman Al Saud in Egypt and the two forged a partnership that has endured despite occasional severe strains for the last 70 years.” Reidel went on:
“The meeting was a closely held secret for security reasons. Only a handful on each side knew it was coming. FDR and Ibn Saud met on the USS Quincy, a cruiser, in the Great Bitter Lake along the Suez Canal, as World War II was coming to an end. FDR arrived from the Yalta summit with Soviet leader Joseph Stalin and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill. Roosevelt’s health was very poor; he had only weeks to live. Ibn Saud had come from Jeddah on an American destroyer, the USS Murphy, with an entourage of bodyguards, cooks, slaves, an astrologer, a fortune-teller and other retainers and some sheep. The king only reluctantly agreed to leave his wives behind in Jeddah. It was his first trip outside the Arabian Peninsula aside from a brief visit to Basra in Iraq. The two agreed to work together to ensure stability in the post-war Middle East. The United States would ensure security for the kingdom, and the Saudis would ensure access to their oil fields. The United States acquired use of Dhahran air base for operations in the Middle East. US oil companies were already operating in the kingdom. Saudi Arabia declared war on Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan two weeks later, securing a seat in the United Nations.”
Barack Obama wants to continue the program that George H.W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and G.W. Bush, worked on before him, to surround Russia with NATO missiles. The takeover of Ukraine, and the enlistment of the Arabic oil sheikhs in assisting further to turn the screws against Russia, are key components in doing that: crushing Russia’s resistance to American domination.
Whereas, for FDR, the alliance with Sunni Islam was purely anti-communist, against the Soviet Union, the U.S. Presidents after 1980 were and are anti-Russian, and it has nothing whatsoever to do with ideology. The U.S. aristocracy intend to dominate the aristocracy in every other nation, and Russia is the only militarily powerful nation that is opposed to being controlled by this global Empire. Consequently, President Obama, who is an agent for America’s aristocracy, wants to cripple if not destroy Russia. And this is why, in his National Security Strategy 2015, 17 of the 18 times he uses the term ‘aggression’ are applying it against Russia. Russia’s President Putin would have to be an idiot not to recognize that today’s United States (its aristocracy, not the American public, who are quite different) is extremely hostile.
Russia could be the bulwark that, along with the rest of Europe and America, could restrain Islamic extremism; but, since America’s aristocracy is primarily concerned with crushing Russia, Islamic terrorism will probably only continue to grow.
Furthermore, events such as 9/11 are necessary for the Arabic aristocrats in order for them to keep their clerics with them and thereby control their own nation’s public.
Here is an official photo of Poroshenko with Abu Dhabi’s Crown Prince Al Nahyan:
Screen Shot 2015-02-24 at 7.30.39 PM
So: the U.S. ends up being allied with Islamic terrorists, while accusing Russia of backing ‘terrorists’ in the former Ukraine, whose only crime is that they don’t want to be slaughtered.
On 12 February 2015, was issued a “Statement by IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde on Ukraine,” which opened: “Ms. Christine Lagarde, Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), statement today in Brussels, Belgium: ‘I am pleased to announce that the IMF team working in Kiev has reached a staff-level agreement with the Ukrainian government on a new economic reform program that would be supported by an Extended Fund Facility of SDR 12.35 billion (about $17.5 billion, €15.5 billion) from the IMF, as well as by additional resources from the international community.” Violating even the IMF’s own prohibitions against pouring loans into a nation that’s at war, the IMF was here making clear that they were 100% behind Obama’s Ukrainian proxy war against Russia. This is where the money will come from to finance Ukraine’s acquisition of more weapons to exterminate or else drive out the residents in the area of Ukraine that had voted 90% for the democratically elected Ukrainian President that Obama overthrew.
It’s ongoing mass-murder on the installment plan, with the IMF providing most of the funds.
Because the loaned money is going to pay the ethnic-cleansing campaign, it’s not going toward the needs of the Ukrainian people. This is extreme austerity, and it started immediately, a day after the day, 26 February 2014, when Arseniy Yatsenyuk became appointed to run the country, as he had been selected to do by Victoria Nuland of Obama’s State Department 22 days prior. As Kommersant reported, on 6 March 2014: “the strategy of the government was approved in Parliament on 27 February and on 3 March the Ministry of Finance sent an action plan for approval to the Ministry of Economic Development. The document is striking in its scale. … ‘Under the Knife’ go social costs. Already in March, the payment of pensions will be reduced to only 50% of the designated pension amounts.” But an uproar held that up. However, now it’s being done.
On December 11th: “Cabinet wants to reduce schooling to 9 years [from 12 years], to reduce the cost of the budget Finance Ministry proposes to amend the legislation governing the humanitarian sphere, the sphere of public administration, pensions, social security, the work of the prosecution and the army.”
On December 19th: “Education Minister Sergey Kvit noted that the department, which he heads, will never agree to such a proposal.”
On December 24th: “Education Minister Sergei quits.”
Pensions are now set to be halved, even in the greatly depreciated Ukrainian currency; and public schooling is to be reduced to only 9 years. All of that IMF (and U.S., and EU) money goes instead to pay to mass-murder the residents in Ukraine’s former Donbass region, the area shown on this map in which the residents voted 90% for Viktor Yanukovych, whom Obama overthrew, and where all of the residents are officially ’terrorists.’ The phrase for that used to be: “free-fire zone.” Obama wants the residents exterminated, and the IMF and EU are going along with that.
The circuitous way in which Ukraine will be buying its weapons is designed to avoid triggering a declaration of war by Vladimir Putin, or else to make non-obvious to the public why he would be justified in doing so.