Exposed - U.S. Diplomat Behind Artillery Satellite Images was Involved in the Toppling of Yanukovich
Yesterday,
July 27th, the U.S. state department decided to launch what turned out
to be a rather weak propaganda spasm in their long running campaign
against Russia. Interestingly, this round involved satellite images
which were supposedly taken four days after the MH17 crash, but if you
were expecting these images to be the long awaited evidence proving that
the separatists shot down MH17 you are in for a disappointment. No, the
images released by the U.S. State Department have absolutely nothing to
do with the downing of MH17, or any other aircraft for that matter.
These images supposedly show that Russia fired HEAVY ARTILLERY into
Ukraine recently.
Heavy
artillery can't hit an airliner (unless it's parked on the ground), so
one can only assume that these new claims are designed distract the
public from the MH17 debacle (which seems to have decidedly backfired on them at this point),
and to draw their attention to a new warmongering narrative. In any
case, the fact that the U.S. State Department was willing to go to the
trouble to fish out a set of grainy images that have absolutely nothing
to do with what may very well be the most important airline disaster
since 9/11, when the whole world is questioning their story, makes it
abundantly clear that whatever the satellite images taken on July 17th
actually show, they don't support Washington's narrative.
UPDATE:
Some people have pointed out that there are anti-aircraft guns that
they refer to as anti-aircraft artillery, however the artillery
described by the State Department in their pdf report were
heavy artillery used to attack terrestrial targets, not anti-aircraft
artillery, and they specifically mention craters on the ground where the
shells supposedly landed. Go read it yourself.
Again
heavy artillery cannot hit an airliner flying at 32,000 feet. It can't
even come close, so don't let people try to blur this issue.
Now
Russia has come out to call these images fake, and until the dust
settles on this it's a bit premature to call it one way or another, but
even while the jury is out on the technical side, we have one major red
flag already. It turns out that the man that the U.S. State Department
has put in charge of pushing this story is none other than our good
friend Geoffrey Pyatt.
Geoffrey
Pyatt was the man on the other end of the now infamous leaked Victoria
Nuland call. That was the call in which the U.S. State Department got
caught red handed discussing who they were going to install in the
Ukrainian government after the fall of Yanukovich. If you haven't
listened to that call, you should. It was very revealing.
Oh,
by the way, you probably heard of this audio clip back when it was
first released. The main stream media put all attention on the fact that
Victoria Nuland said "Fuck the E.U." Apparently these "journalists"
consider her potty mouth to be more important than the fact that the
U.S. State Department was caught red handed installing a puppet
government.
One
has to wonder why the U.S. government is willing to use these same
characters even after they've been compromised in previous operations.
Are they just having a hard time recruiting qualified henchmen, are they
just counting on the public having the attention span of a gnat, or are
they just getting desperate? It might be a combination of the three.
By the way, if you missed the opening act of this fiasco, watch the video below to catch up.
No comments:
Post a Comment