Friday, February 24, 2017

Google, Facebook & Twitter Policing Trolls? What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

We live in a world where Fake News is overlooked and even encouraged

Google, Facebook & Twitter Policing Trolls?  What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

Google couldn’t get Hillary Clinton elected president but now they’re going deep into the world of communication as self-appointed scrubbers of “hate speech” online.
Hate speech to you could be Madonna saying at last month’s Washington March that she thinks of “blowing up the White House”.  Hate speech to Google could be posting that you think “Donald Trump makes a better president than Hillary Clinton ever would”.
Video Border Wall Pays for Itself
Silencing those with whom you disagree under the blanket of “hate speech” is a very sneaky business, but when the sneak just happens to be the world’s foremost search engine, sneak turns to snark and there’s no way around it.
For bloggers, commenters and news sites Google’s “hate speech” fence will be much harder to scale than any wall at the U.S. southern border.
We live in a world where Fake News is overlooked and even encouraged and in one where a country called Canada could smear by law an “Islamophobe “ on anyone merely stating that they fear the inherent dangers of Islamic terrorism.
In America the term “Islamic terrorism” was made a no-no by a president now waiting in the shadows to return as a revolutionary renegade with troops of some 32,000, 25,000 of them now actively teaching anarchists how best to induce chaos.  In Germany, Chancellor Angela Merkel insists that ISIS has nothing to do with Islamic terrorism.
In Canada, backbencher Liberal MP Iqra Khalid found overwhelming support from all parties when she put forward M-103, a motion that protects Islam above all other religions and races.
The timing for Google to police online hate speech couldn’t have been more perfect.
Google first laid claim to having a monopoly—the only one in existence—on the truth in another incident timing of which was perfect—the 2016 presidential election campaign.
Little mention was made by the mainstream media that the same company, so unabashedly claiming a monopoly on truth,  was running Clinton’s digital presidential campaign.
From the Financial Times:
“Google has launched an artificial intelligence tool that identifies abusive comments online, helping publishers respond to growing pressure to clamp down on hate speech.
:Google’s freely available software, known as Perspective, is being tested by a range of news organisations, including The New York Times, The Guardian and The Economist, as a way to help simplify the jobs of humans reviewing comments on their stories.
“News organisations want to encourage engagement and discussion around their content, but find that sorting through millions of comments to find those that are trolling or abusive takes a lot of money, labour and time,” said Jared Cohen, president of Jigsaw, the Google social incubator that built the tool.
“As a result, many sites have shut down comments altogether. But they tell us that isn’t the solution they want.”
“Currently, the software is available to a range of publications that are part of Google’s Digital News Initiative, including the BBC, the Financial Times, Les Echos and La Stampa, and theoretically to third-party social media platforms including YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.
Continued below...

“We are open to working with anyone from small developers to the biggest platforms on the internet. We all have a shared interest and benefit from healthy online discussions,” said CJ Adams, product manager at Jigsaw.
“Perspective helps to filter abusive comments more quickly for human review. The algorithm was trained on hundreds of thousands of user comments that had been labelled as “toxic” by human reviewers, on sites such as Wikipedia and the New York Times.
“It works by scoring online comments based on how similar they are to comments tagged as “toxic” or likely to make someone leave a conversation.
“All of us are familiar with increased toxicity around comments in online conversations,” Mr Cohen said. “People are leaving conversations because of this, and we want to empower publications to get those people back.”
“The New York Times trial resulted in reviewers being able to check twice as many comments in the same amount of time, as the algorithm helped to narrow down the pool of possibilities.
“Their goal is to be able to [improve] review speed by 10x, so the project is ongoing,” said Lucas Dixon, Jigsaw’s chief research scientist.
“Google is not the first to attempt to curb trolling online. Earlier this month, Twitter stepped up its efforts by making tweaks to hide abuse from its users, rather than remove content from the platform completely.
“Its chief executive Jack Dorsey tweeted at the time that Twitter was measuring its progress against abuse on a daily basis.
“In May, US tech groups including Google, Facebook, Twitter and Microsoft signed a “code of conduct” with Brussels that required them to “review the majority” of flagged hate speech within 24 hours, remove it if necessary and even develop “counter narratives” to confront the problem.”
Meanwhile, the pool—Google, Facebook, Twitter and Microsoft—trying to curb trolling online is toxic.
The “code of conduct” was signed with Brussels, headquarters of the freedom-killing European Union.
Some dare to ask: “What could possibly go wrong?”.

No comments: