Former CIA chief: Every attempt likely made to verify unsubstantiated claims against Trump
(CNN)Former
CIA director Leon Panetta said Thursday he believes the intelligence
community made every possible attempt to verify unsubstantiated claims
that Russia may have compromising information on President-elect Donald
Trump.
In an interview on CNN's
"Erin Burnett Outfront," Panetta said "I would assume that they made
every effort to try to substantiate and corroborate that information."
"So,
my sense is that they made the effort, they were unable to do it, but
because it was so sensitive, they felt an obligation to present it to
the key players," he said.
CNN
first reported that the nation's top intelligence chiefs provided both
the President and President-elect a two-page written synopsis of the
claims, which came from a 35-page report compiled by a former British
intelligence operative based on Russian sources. Intelligence agencies
appended a two-page summary of the unverified allegations to documents
prepared for the briefing on Russian meddling in the 2016 US
presidential election.
Multiple US
officials briefed on the matter told CNN on Thursday that FBI Director
James Comey and Trump had a brief one-on-one conversation at last
Friday's intelligence briefing.
It's
during that pull aside that Comey briefed the President-elect on the
two-page synopsis of the claims about Trump and Russia. All four
intelligence chiefs had decided that Comey would be the one who would
handle the sensitive discussion with the President-elect.
The discussion was described by the sources as cordial.
The FBI declined to comment on this account.
The
memos originated as opposition research, first commissioned by
anti-Trump Republicans, and later by Democrats. At this point, CNN is
not reporting on details of the memos, as it has not independently
corroborated the specific allegations. But, in preparing this story, CNN
has spoken to multiple high ranking intelligence, administration,
congressional and law enforcement officials, as well as foreign
officials and others in the private sector with direct knowledge of the
memos.
Panetta defended still
including the information in briefings, saying, "The reason I think it
was included, Erin, is because it's very sensitive information, even
though it's unsubstantiated and uncorroborated. The fact is that it is
extremely sensitive and I think the problem is that the intelligence
agencies would have felt that they would be at fault if they didn't
bring that to the attention of the principals."
He
added that "this is what happens in intelligence briefings" and "it's
important to bring it to the attention of the key people so that they
know this information is out there."
Panetta
would not say whether or not he believes the unsubstantiated claims
yet, adding "I think this is the kind of report that really does require
that you got to look at a number of different sources to see whether or
not it really is true."
No comments:
Post a Comment