|
Unprecedented Crisis, Collapse of the Clinton Apparatus? Hacker Whistleblowers, Trump, and the FBI Converge
|
By Larry Chin
Global Research, November 01, 2016
|
Url of this article:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/unprecedented-crisis-collapse-of-the-clinton-apparatus-hacker-whistleblowers-trump-and-the-fbi-converge/5554349
|
With one week left in the most chaotic and dangerous presidential
contest in American history, the Hillary Rodham Clinton campaign is
damaged and sinking. Even the propaganda protection of the
Clinton-controlled mainstream corporate media is starting to buckle.
Hillary Clinton is being bombshelled on a daily basis by hacker whistleblowers led by Wikileaks.
Companion sites such as Most Damning Wikileaks, which sorts the raw data and provides analysis, have also been in overdrive.
Countless Web/social media-based investigators, journalists and activists (Anonymous, DC Leaks, Guccifer 2.0, Michael Trimm, H.A. Goodman, Styxhexenhammer666, and anonymous posters at 4Chan, to name just a few), Project Veritas,
Judicial Watch, and surging populist forces behind Donald Trump, are
exposing the Clinton machine from every angle. There are still more
bombshells to come.
Now the FBI has opened two new investigations into Hillary Clinton’s emails.
The most recent Wikileaks exposures
provide clear evidence that Hillary Clinton and her team of aides and
operatives knowingly used unencrypted private computers to conduct
secret business (including exchanging classified information), knowingly
tried to hide and destroy evidence of this activity, and were involved
in an active cover-up.
Emails of Clinton associate Cheryl Mills also implicate President
Barack Obama. Obama not only knew about Clinton’s private server, he
knowingly communicated with Clinton via this private server.
It is believed that the overwhelming amount of significant evidence compelled the FBI to act.
At the center of it all is top Clinton aide Huma Abedin. The FBI has
found some 650,000 emails on the computers and devices of Abedin and her
estranged husband, former congressman Anthony Weiner. The classified
Clinton-related emails were a surprise discovery made in the course of
FBI’s investigation into Weiner’s pedophilia case. The Department of
Justice has obtained warrant to search multiple Abedin/Weiner computers.
What the new stash contains is being sorted out and catalogued by the
FBI. The sheer number of surprise new emails raises questions all by
itself.
What exactly were Hillary and her team trying to hide? Was Clinton
running secret operations, with Obama’s knowledge and participation, via
private devices? If so, what were these secret operations? Was it to
hide “shadow government” foreign policy, and “off the books” activities?
Or was it about hiding the criminal activities of the Clinton
Foundation, which has already been exposed by Wikileaks as a (very
Iran-Contra) front for the covert funding of terrorists
(including ISIS, via Saudi Arabia and Qatar), influence peddling,
pay-for-play schemes, money laundering, fraud, weapons deals, and other
crimes?
Was it to hide personal depravity along the lines of pedophilia and connections to a larger Washington pedophilia ring?
Will the new investigation go beyond the violation of security
procedures, to the issue of criminal intent, as well as the evidence of
crimes contained in the emails themselves?
Indictments are being prepared.
The FBI decision in context
 Both
FBI Director James Comey and Attorney General Loretta Lynch (right) are
compromised individuals with deep ties to the Clintons. Why did Comey
take action at this time? Lynch was pressured or blackmailed by Bill
Clinton to stop the initial investigation of Hillary, but did not, or
could not, stand in the way of this round.
President Obama has adopted a “neutral” stance. Obama has also stopped campaigning for or with Hillary.
The fact that these Clinton surrogates and Obama (an important
Hillary cheerleader), are now “turning against Hillary” speaks volumes:
- There is so much damning evidence that new probes had to be opened,
according to the Hatch Act, which would make it a crime for Comey not to
take action. So much that not even Comey/Lynch/Obama can cover for
Hillary any longer.
- Serious internal pressure within the FBI itself caused Comey to do
his job, or face a mutiny. Many FBI agents were furious about how Comey
let Clinton off the hook the first time. Comey is now “covering his rear
end”.
- Clinton’s campaign is damaged, possibly beyond repair. “Rats are
jumping off the sinking ship”. The Democratic establishment may be
forced to consider a backup plan to replace Clinton (with Tim Kaine) or
cancel the election by some other means.
- Now that his own security-breaching communications with Clinton via
her private server have been exposed by Wikileaks, Obama is distancing
himself from Clinton, a major blow to Hillary’s campaign.
- Some skeptical observers have proposed that the FBI investigation could be a smokescreen
diversion, a distraction from more potentially damaging, game-ending
material expected to be released by Wikileaks and other sources in the
coming week. However, it does appear that the actual “smoking guns” are
so numerous and blatant, that the Clintons are in real trouble.
 The
Democratic Party establishment is in panic mode. They have resorted
again to blaming Russia. Comey is being attacked as a Russian agent. Comey (left) has now become as much of a target as Trump, who continues to be accused of being a Russian spy.
The weak and empty response by an already weakened Hillary and the
Democratic Party leadership is a sure sign that the election could very
well be lost.
All the queen’s women and men
In the Watergate scandal, Nixon’s surrogates took the fall, and
Gerald Ford pardoned him. In Iran-Contra, numerous operatives “fell on
the sword” to protect the Bushes and the CIA.
What fate awaits Hillary Clinton?
Will Hillary’s operatives (Huma Abedin, Cheryl Mills, Neara Tanden,
John Podesta, Bob Creamer, etc.) protect her, or turn on her? Who will
be left to protect her?
Democratic National Committee chair Donna Brazile, a faithful Clinton
surrogate, has been forced to resign, after Wikileaks exposed the fact
that she helped Hillary cheat in two debates. (Brazile was abused by Hillary in meltdown mode
after she had failed to effectively help Hillary cheat her way through a
panel with NBC’s Matt Lauer. She will no longer have to put up with
being called a “cow” by Clinton.)
Saudi-born (Muslim Brotherhood-connected) Huma Abedin, perhaps the
key figure in the case, has asked for immunity. If Abedin tells the
truth, she could destroy the Clintons, and be in danger for the rest of
her life. Abedin, Hillary Clinton’s most personal aide, has been
missing, not been seen with Hillary or the campaign in days.
On the other hand, it would not be surprising if Abedin resorts to
pleading the Fifth, or the favorite technique used by the guilty:
repeatedly saying “I don’t recall”. Huma has already suggested she had
“no idea” how the emails wound up on her computer.
It seems that some of the incriminating documents are contained in a
file titled “Life Insurance”. This suggests that Abedin stashed
incriminating material for insurance in the event that the Clintons
threatened her life.
Weiner, however, is a different matter. He is not beholden to the Clintons, and could be more inclined to “sing”.
The first of a new kind of information war
The incendiary warfare for this election, and the control of the US
government is all happening without the knowledge of the large segment
of the ambivalent/ignorant population that relies exclusively on
mainstream (Clinton-dominated) corporate media.
The war for information is being fought entirely on the Web and, as
exemplified by the Clinton scandals, the battle is over the contents of
computer data. Corporate broadcast and print media has not covered much
of the action at all. Within the corporate media bubble, Hillary still
retains a lead, Trump is still a pervert and a madman, and the FBI is on
a puzzling witch hunt. But even this bubble is beginning to burst.
Hillary is in so much trouble, that even the corporate media is starting
to be forced to report.
There is a strong possibility that this election will be fought and decided without the participation of this left-out segment.
These people will be shocked, surprised and baffled by it all. There is not much time left to get them to begin to understand.
Unprecedented crisis
Hillary Clinton and her campaign have been severely damaged by
resistance from all sides. According to conditions on the ground, and
according to a growing number of the more accurate national polls, Trump
is surging. He may even have a significant lead.
However, the election has already been rigged and stolen for a Clinton victory. They have the means, the technology, and it is already happening.
The question now is whether the FBI investigation, and last minute
bombshells from Wikileaks, completely changes the landscape in the
remaining days.
This conflict will last well beyond the election and its result.
Nixon won the presidential election in 1972 in a landslide, but was forced to leave office because of Watergate.
Even if Clinton gets her way, she will be also be scandalized and
investigated a la Nixon. A constitutional crisis is virtually
guaranteed. She could be indicted before or after taking office. She
could be pardoned by Obama. She could be impeached. In the unlikely
event that she survives all of that, resistance to her will be
never-ending. She is so corrupt, and has antagonized so many people and
nations, that will not be able to govern or conduct diplomacy in any
case.
In the short term, the possibility of a major false flag event to
distract from, and cancel election, remains the biggest and most
terrifying scenario. And/or a martial law crackdown on the US in the
event of civil unrest caused by a contested election.
More bombshells, possibly the biggest ones yet, have been promised
for the final weeks and days, including more Wikileaks, more from
Project Veritas, more from Anonymous.
It is far from over. Expect October Surprises, November Surprises, and the unprecedented.
|
|
Disclaimer: The contents of this article are of sole
responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on
Globalization will not be responsible for any inaccurate or incorrect
statement in this article.
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment