HUSH YOUR MOUTH
05.12.16 1:00 PM ET
The FBI Is Keeping 80,000 Secret Files on the Saudis and 9/11
The
secret ‘28 pages’ are just the start. The FBI has another 80,000
classified documents, many of which deal with Saudi connections to the
9/11 terror plot. What’s the Bureau got?
The Obama administration may soon release 28 classified pages from a congressional investigation that allegedly links Saudis in the United States to the 9/11 attackers. A former Republican member of the 9/11 Commission alleged Thursday that there was “clear evidence” of support for the hijackers from Saudi officials.
But in Florida, a federal judge is weighing whether to declassify portions of some 80,000 classified pages
that could reveal far more about the hijackers’ Saudis connections and
their activities in the weeks preceding the worst attack on U.S. soil.
The
still-secret files speak to one of the strangest and most enduring
mysteries of the 9/11 attacks. Why did the Saudi occupants of a posh
house in gated community in Sarasota, Florida, suddenly vanish in the
two weeks prior to the attacks? And had they been in touch with the
leader of the operation, Mohamed Atta, and two of his co-conspirators?
No
way, the FBI says, even though the bureau’s own agents did initially
suspect the family was linked to some of the hijackers. On further
scrutiny, those connections proved unfounded, officials now say.
But
a team of lawyers and investigative journalists has found what they say
is hard evidence pointing in the other direction. Atta did visit the
family before he led 18 men to their deaths and murdered 3,000 people,
they say, and phone records connect the house to members of the 9/11
conspiracy.
The
FBI did initially suspect something was off when their agents descended
on the Sarasota house shortly after the attacks, tipped off by
suspicious neighbors who had always found the family aloof.
Investigators
found signs that the occupants had left in a hurry. Food was left on
the counter and the refrigerator was stocked. Toys were still floating
in the backyard swimming pool. Dirty diapers were left in a bathroom. It
also looked like the people who lived there weren’t coming back. The
mail was piling up outside, and the door to an empty safe was wide open.
Three cars remained parked in the garage and driveway.
The
FBI later said it came up with reasonable answers to explain this odd
behavior—but not until after the Tampa field office opened an
investigation that claimed to find “numerous connections” between the
family and the 9/11 hijackers.
The
final answers about what really happened in Sarasota may lie somewhere
in those 80,000 pages. To be sure, not all of them concern the FBI’s
investigation of the Saudi family. The documents represent the entire
case file of the 9/11 attacks at the Tampa field office. But some subset
surely will reveal more about what the FBI knew, and when, and why it
reached a different conclusion.
For
the past two years, U.S. District Court Judge William Zloch has been
going through the files, page by page, to determine what information
that pertains to the Saudi case can be released.
But based on about three dozen pages that had been made public already under the Freedom of Information Act, and the work of the reporters,
this is the picture that emerges of life at 4224 Escondito Circle, a
three-bedroom house in an exclusive community called Prestancia, in the
weeks before 9/11.
The
house was occupied by a Saudi couple, Abdulazzi al-Hiijjii and his wife
Anoud, and their three small children. Anoud’s father, Esam Ghazzawi, a
financier and interior designer, owned the home, along with his
American-born wife, Deborah.
The family largely kept to themselves. A neighbor told the Tampa Bay Times that Abdulazzi said he was a student,
and that his wife was religious. “He would come over for a cigarette
and a drink and to get away from that praying every two hours,” the
neighbor said.
But
the family’s behavior, and undoubtedly their national origin, drew new
suspicion after the 9/11 attacks. In April 2002, “based upon repeated
citizen calls,” the FBI opened an investigation, which “revealed many
connections” between a member of the family “and individuals associated
with the terrorist attacks,” according to one of the few released
documents.
Those
jaw-dropping claims remained largely unknown for years. In part, that’s
because the FBI now says that the initial reports came from an agent
who couldn’t support his suspicions. Investigators later interviewed
members of the family and found they had left the U.S. because Abdulazzi
had just graduated and gotten a new job in Saudi Arabia.
The
Sarasota family also had no connections to the 9/11 terrorists, the FBI
concluded. (Their names are redacted in the reports, for privacy, but
they have been publicly confirmed.)
Case
closed? Hardly. In 2011, a pair of Irish journalists, Anthony Summers
and Robbyn Swan, who were publishing a book on the 10th anniversary of
the attacks, contacted Dan Christensen, a veteran Florida reporter.
They’d heard about the Sarasota family and had a confidential source—an
unnamed counterterrorism official—who claimed to have detailed knowledge
of the FBI’s investigation into the couple, including analysis of phone
records that showed calls to and from the house connected to the
hijackers. What’s more, the source also said that visitor logs from the
security gate of the community showed that Atta, along with co-hijacker
Ziad Jarrah, had come to the house, and that those logs had been turned
over to the FBI.
The journalists teamed up and published an exposé on Christensen’s independent news site, FloridaBulldog.org, and on the front page of the Miami Herald.
The story was an instant sensation, prompting the FBI to publicly
declare that the case had been investigated and found to have no merit.
Sen. Bob Graham, the Florida Democrat who had led the congressional inquiry that produced those 28 pages
on Saudi connections, was stunned by the Sarasota allegations. The FBI
hadn’t given Graham’s committee any information about the family or
their suspected ties to Atta and other hijackers. Even the initial
reports the FBI later said proved wrong weren’t disclosed to
congressional investigators, Graham said. The journalists findings
“open[ed] the door to a new chapter of investigation as to the depth of
the Saudi role in 9/11,” Graham said at the time.
The
FBI continued to publicly knock down the Sarasota connection. Graham
eventually confronted the bureau and asked to see files from the Tampa
field office. As he told The Daily Beast’s Eleanor Clift for a
forthcoming article, Graham saw records that did show alleged contacts
between the family and three hijackers, and further lines of inquiry
that investigators could follow.
Later,
Graham himself was confronted by the FBI’s then-deputy director, Sean
Joyce, who told him, “Basically everything about 9/11 was known and I
was wasting my time and I should get a life,” Graham said.
For
his part, Christensen took the government to court, suing under the
Freedom of Information Act for the files and records to substantiate—or
refute—his sources’ claims.
Thomas
Julin, Christensen’s lawyer, told The Daily Beast that initially the
FBI claimed it had no records. But when Julin told officials that Graham
was willing to testify that he’d actually seen some, the Justice
Department admitted to having found 35 pages of material, which it
released.
It’s
those pages, many of which bear heavy redactions, that show the FBI
agents’ initial suspicions, the fact that an FBI case was open, and that
investigators had found “many connections” between the family and the
hijackers. There are also letters and memos from FBI officials
dismissing the 9/11 connection as unfounded.
Those 35 pages were all the FBI could find about the alleged Sarasota conspiracy, officials insisted.
Zloch,
the judge in the case, was not persuaded. He ordered the FBI to conduct
a new search of its files, using a method that Christensen and his
lawyer suggested. This time, they hit the mother lode.
“The
FBI found some additional responsive documents which it produced,”
Julin said. “But it also found 80,266 pages of material in the Tampa
Field Office of the FBI which had been marked with the file number for
the FBI’s PENTTBOM investigation.”
PENTTBOM, which stands for Pentagon/Twin Towers Bombing, is the codename for the FBI’s investigation of the 9/11 attacks.
The
judge ordered the FBI to hand over all 80,000-plus pages on May 1,
2014. He is still going through them to determine which may be released
and has given no indication when he might finish.
Zloch’s
task is made all the more painstaking by the strict security rules
governing review of classified documents, even for a sitting judge. The
files are kept in a secure facility, and he can only remove a portion at
a time.
It’s
still not clear how many of the files from the Tampa field office
relate to the investigation of the Saudi family and the house on
Escondito Circle. But Christensen believes those files will reveal the
underlying reasons for the FBI’s early suspicions. And he’s prepared to
be proven wrong.
The
FBI, for instance, says that phone records searches showed no links to
the house and the hijackers. Christensen’s confidential source says the
opposite is true. If the FBI is right, Christensen asks, then why not
just release the information and put the dispute to rest?
“I’ve
spent five years on this. I’ve got other things to do. If there’s
nothing to this, then tell me,” Christensen told The Daily Beast.
The
public record so far has hardly allayed Christensen’s and others’
belief that there’s more to the Sarasota story than the FBI is telling.
Indeed, they say, the FBI is contradicting its own investigators. Graham
told The Daily Beast that the FBI questioned the reliability of the
agent who filed the first reports about the family and possible
connections to the attackers. They said he was “not a good writer and
should not be taken as the last word,” Graham said.
But
that agent was reportedly promoted after the 9/11 attacks and assigned
to a counter-intelligence task force. The bureau doesn’t usually give
new jobs to agents who can’t do basic field work, particularly on the
biggest case in FBI history.
As far as Christensen is concerned, the truth will out. But the FBI’s silence is telling.
Not
to be content with just the 80,000 pages, though, Christensen has also
been pressing to get those 28 pages from the congressional inquiry
released. They have an appeal pending before the Interagency Security
Classification Appeals Panel, an obscure group within the National
Archives that has the power to declassify the material, in whole or in
part.
An
Archives official wouldn’t comment on the appeal, except to say that
the panel has yet to officially take it up. According to a public
docket, the appeal was filed in July 2014.
President
Obama could elect to declassify the pages himself. Or he could defer to
the judgment of the panel. Doing so would give him some political
cover. It would also allow the president to make good on his commitment
to finally let the public see what those pages have to say.
If
that day finally comes, credit will surely go to Graham, who has
pressed for their release for years. But some share may also be claimed
by Christensen and Julin, whose hunt for the Sarasota connection led
them to shake loose the 28 pages, too.
Both men said that the release of that better-known material may ultimately help bring the Sarasota files to light.
“If
the 28 pages are declassified, that might persuade the judge to move
forward,” Julin said. He doesn’t think the congressional report has
anything to say about Sarasota—because, after all, Graham has said the
FBI gave his committee nothing on the case—but “the material might help
Judge Zloch see the wider significance of the events in Sarasota and
persuade him that some or all of the records have not been properly
classified,” Julin said.
Christensen
noted that the Obama administration didn’t publicly acknowledge that it
might soon release the 28 pages until after Graham and other lawmakers
appeared in a recent episode of 60 Minutes about
the controversy. He said he hopes the judge saw the show, and that the
“intense national interest” that’s brewing around Saudi connections to
9/11 might resonate with him.
Two
years or waiting for the judge’s ruling may be close to an end. “I
believe this is not a stalling tactic at all. The judge is doing what he
has to comply” with rules for handling classified information,
Christensen said. “But I would urge him to speed it up.”
— with additional reporting from Eleanor Clift.
No comments:
Post a Comment