Sunday, May 15, 2016

SOTN: Alternative News & Commentary


Revealing the True State
of the Nation

·                                Home
·                                About
SOTN

High Crimes and Misdemeanors: A Critical Perspective



High
Crimes and Misdemeanors

High Crimes and Misdemeanors,
a reading on the meaning of this strange phrase
that is the grounds for most impeachments
and an  activity in which students determine
the outcome of hypothetical
impeachment proceedings.
Constitutional Rights Foundation,
601 South Kingsley
Drive
,
Los Angeles,
CA 90005
,
(213) 487-5590
Fax (213) 386-0459

[Ed
Note: Recent revelations that have been disclosed through intelligence sources
has led to a review of the basic elements and circumstances of the core data
for predicate and foundation of cause of action on a hypothetical
 scenario concerning this area of Constitutional actions which might be
applied to events in context of current direct data from current sourced and
historical context of a
 Continuing Criminal Enterprise.

In
broad review as a psychiatrist the patterns of behavior once exercised ,
lubricate recidivism and  continuation as a sense of hubris that allows
the perpetrator the view that since they got away with it before , they are
above the law and have an unique protected status,
 “Psychology of the
Exception” 
 which allows for unique defenses of “in the interests of Security
of the United States” and “Executive Privilege”
 which can when invoked in high
office to block and
 obstruct justice from further discourse of the
details
 of what would otherwise be direct clarity of investigation in
other circumstances.

In
light of the forum of the 2016 Election cycle, it is up to the court of last
resort the
people of the United States v the Central CommitteeEstablishment in
academic hypothetical case, to make a clear determination as
to whether the issue of
 High Crimes and Misdemeanors has relevance and bearing in
their choice at the polls to determine eligibility for office
and execution of the trust and confidence in the credibility of their
political and personal behavior supports the endorsement for public
office. 
In
context this could include: 
§                    Watergate
§                    Chinagate selling intelligence assets for other consideration to
office holder 
§                    Mena, Arkansas Drug-running Operation —
Cocaine  
§                    Benghazigate 
§                    Whitewatergate 
§                    Isolated political adversaries for multiple unexplained
death 
§                    Selling email TOP SECRET memos to expose critical Security Issues
to foreign powers for campaign funds
§                    Selling special grants for major military security interests to
foreign powers for donations to foundation. 
§                    Firing White House Aids for political favors to donors 

As
responsible citizens of the United
States we have a forum to evaluate the
definitive resolution of the placing in office the people responsible for the
management and destiny of our families and homes in the hands of clearly
responsible and honest trustworthy people.

In
the early history these people were considered
 GODS , Emperors for life, and the later the Divine Right of
Kings, 
under the current government the imperfections of people in
general
 are included in the process and the Forum of Last Resort is provided to us by the
democratic practice, realizing that human perfection is not one of the
choices.  

Arden Gifford, MD
Addiction Psychiatrist
American Board of Psychiatrist And Neurology] 
————————Article———————–

 

 

High Crimes and Misdemeanors


The
U.S.
Constitution provides impeachment as the method for removing the president,
vice president, federal judges, and other federal officials from office. The
impeachment process begins in the House of Representatives and follows these
steps:
1.  The House Judiciary Committee holds hearings and, if
necessary, prepares articles of impeachment. These are the charges against the
official.
2.  If a majority of the committee votes to approve
the articles, the whole House debates and votes on them.
3.  If a majority of the House votes to impeach the
official on any article, then the official
 must then stand trial in the Senate.
4.  For the official to be removed from office, two-thirds of the
Senate must vote to convict the official. Upon conviction, the official is
automatically removed from office and, if the Senate so decides, may be
 forbidden from holding
governmental office again.
The
impeachment process is
 political in nature, not criminal. Congress has no power to
impose criminal penalties on impeached officials. But
 criminal courts may try and
punish officials if they have committed crimes.
The
Constitution sets specific grounds for impeachment.

“They
are “treason, bribery, and

other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

To
be impeached and removed from office, the House and Senate must find that the
official committed one of these acts.
The
Constitution defines treason in
 Article 3, Section 3, Clause 1: 

Treason against the United States,
shall consist only in levying War against them,
or in adhering to their Enemies,
giving them Aid and Comfort.

No
Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses
to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The
Constitution does not define bribery. It is a crime that has long existed in
English and American common law.

It takes place when a person
gives an official money or gifts
to influence the official’s behavior in office.
 

For
example, if defendant Smith pays federal Judge Jones $10,000 to find Smith not
guilty, the crime of bribery has occurred. 
Prior
to the Clinton investigation
, the House had begun
impeachment proceedings against only 17 officials —one U.S. senator,
two presidents, one cabinet member, and 13 federal judges. Two of the17
resigned from office before the House voted to impeach.
Of
the 15 impeached, the Senate voted to convict only seven — all were federal
judges. The Senate dropped the case against the senator, ruling that a senator
could not be impeached. One judge resigned from office before the Senate voted
on his case. The Senate voted to acquit the other six officials.
In
all the articles of impeachment that the House has drawn, no official has been
charged with treason. (The closest to a charge of treason was one federal judge
who was impeached and convicted for siding with the South and taking a position
as a Confederate judge during the Civil War.) Two officials have been charged
with bribery. The remaining charges against all the other officials fall under
the category of “high crimes and misdemeanors.”
What
are “high crimes and misdemeanors”? On first hearing this phrase, many people
probably think that it is just an 18th century way of saying “felonies and
misdemeanors.” Felonies are major crimes and misdemeanors are lesser crimes. If
this interpretation were correct, “high crimes and misdemeanors” would simply
mean any crime.
 But this interpretation is mistaken

The Origins of the Phrase

To
better understand the meaning of the phrase, it’s important to examine how the
framers of the Constitution came to adopt it. At the Constitutional Convention
in 1787, the framers wanted to create a stronger central government than what
existed under the Articles of Confederation. Adopted following the American
Revolution, the Articles of Confederation provided for a loose organization of
the states. The framers wanted a stronger federal government, but not one too strong.
To achieve the right balance, the framers divided the powers of the new
government into three branches—the executive, legislative, and judicial. This
is known as the separation of powers. They also gave each branch ways to check
the power of the other branches. For example, although Congress (the
legislative branch) makes laws, the president (the executive) can veto proposed
laws. This complex system is known as checks and balances. 
Impeachment
of judges and executive officials by Congress was one of the checks proposed at
the Constitutional Convention. The impeachment of judges drew widespread
support, because federal judges would hold lifetime appointments and needed
some check on their power. 

But
some framers opposed impeachment of

executive officials, arguing that the
president’s power could be checked
every four years by elections.
 

James
Madison of Virginia
successfully argued that an election every four years did not provide enough of
a check on a president who was incapacitated or abusing the power of the
office. He contended that 
“loss
of capacity, or corruption . . .

might be fatal to the republic” 
if
the president could not be removed until the next election. 
With
the convention agreed on the necessity of impeachment, it next had to agree on
the grounds. One committee proposed the grounds be
 “treason, bribery, and
corruption.”
Another committee was selected to deal with matters not yet
decided. This committee deleted corruption and left “treason or bribery” as the
grounds.
But
the committee’s recommendation did not satisfy everyone. George Mason of Virginia proposed adding
“maladministration.” He thought that treason and bribery did not cover all the
harm that a president might do. He pointed to the English case of Warren
Hastings, whose impeachment trial was then being heard in London. Hastings, the first Governor General
of Bengal in India, was accused of
 corruption and treating the
Indian people brutally
.
Madison objected to
“maladministration.” He thought this term was so vague that it would threaten
the separation of powers. Congress could remove any president it disagreed with
on grounds of “maladministration.” This would give Congress complete power over
the executive. 
Mason
abandoned “maladministration” and proposed “high crimes and misdemeanors
against the state.” The convention adopted Mason’s proposal, but dropped
“against the state.” The final version, which appears in the Constitution,
stated: “The president, vice-president, and all civil officers of the United States,
shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of treason,
bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”
The
convention adopted “high crimes and misdemeanors” with little discussion. Most
of the framers knew the phrase well. Since 1386, the English parliament had
used “high crimes and misdemeanors” as one of the grounds to impeach officials
of the crown. Officials accused of “high crimes and misdemeanors” were accused
of offenses as varied as misappropriating government funds, appointing unfit subordinates,

not prosecuting cases,


not
spending money allocated by Parliament, promoting themselves ahead of more
deserving candidates, threatening a grand jury, disobeying an order from
Parliament, arresting a man to keep him from running for Parliament, losing a
ship by neglecting to moor it, helping “suppress petitions to the King to call
a Parliament,” granting warrants without cause, and bribery. Some of these
charges were crimes. Others were not. The one common denominator in all these
accusations was that the official had somehow abused the power of his office
and was unfit to serve. 
After
the Constitutional Convention, the Constitution had to be ratified by the
states. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay wrote a series of
essays, known as the Federalist Papers, urging support of the Constitution. In
Federalist No. 65, Hamilton
explained impeachment. He defined impeachable offenses as “those offences which
proceed from the misconduct of public men, or in other words from the abuse or
violation of some public trust. They are of a nature which may with peculiar
propriety be denominated political, as they relate chiefly to injuries done
immediately to the society itself.” 
For
the more than 200 years since the Constitution was adopted, Congress has
seriously considered impeachment only 18 times. Thirteen of these cases
involved federal judges. The “high crimes and misdemeanors” that the House
charged against these judges included being habitually drunk, showing
favoritism on the bench, using judicial power unlawfully, using the office for
financial gain, unlawfully punishing people for contempt of court, submitting
false expense accounts, getting special deals from parties appearing before the
court, bullying people in open court, filing false income tax returns, making
false statements while under oath, and disclosing confidential
information. 
Only
three of the 18 impeachment cases have involved a president —
 Andrew Johnson in 1868, Richard
Nixon in 1974, and Bill Clinton in 1998
. It’s important to take a brief look at these
three cases to understand how Congress has interpreted “high crimes and
misdemeanors.”

Andrew Johnson

Andrew
Johnson was the only senator from a Southern state who stayed loyal to the
union during the Civil War. President Abraham Lincoln, seeking to reconcile
with the South, tapped Johnson, a Democrat, as his vice-presidential running
mate in 1864. When Lincoln
was assassinated at the war’s end in 1865, Johnson assumed the presidency. He
immediately ran into trouble with the Republican-dominated Congress over
Reconstruction of the South. The Radical Republicans supported military rule in
the South and voting rights and redistribution of land for blacks. Johnson
disagreed and favored a quick return to civilian rule. The two sides grew
increasingly farther apart as Congress repeatedly passed Reconstruction
legislation, Johnson vetoed it, and Congress overrode his veto. Over Johnson’s
veto, Congress passed a Tenure of Office Act, which required Johnson to get
permission from Congress before firing any member of the executive branch who
had been approved by Congress. Johnson responded by firing the secretary of
war, Edwin Stanton, a Radical Republican. His firing violated the Tenure of
Office Act. But Johnson believed the act was unconstitutional. The House passed
11 articles of impeachment. Eight involved Johnson’s violations of the Tenure
of Office Act. One charged him with sending orders through improper channels.
Another accused him of conspiring against Congress, citing a statement he made
about Congress not representing all the states. The last summarized the other
10 charges and charged him with failing to enforce the Reconstruction Acts. At
the end of the Senate trial, only three charges were brought to a vote. Johnson
was saved from conviction on each by one vote.
History
has not judged well those who brought the charges against Johnson. The charges
are generally seen as politically motivated, based on the extreme disagreement
over Reconstruction between Congress and the president. They are not viewed as
“high crimes and misdemeanors” worthy of removing a president from office. Most
commentators look on this impeachment as a severe threat to the separation of
powers.

Richard Nixon

The
next presidential impeachment case did not arise for more than 100 years.
Before taking a look at the Nixon impeachment case, it’s worth examining a
famous comment made a few years before (in 1970) by then-Congressman Gerald
Ford, who would later succeed Richard Nixon as president. For years, Ford had
urged the House to impeach a liberal justice on the Supreme Court. Although
Ford’s attempts failed, he uttered memorable words about “high crimes and
misdemeanors.” He stated that
 “an impeachable offense is
whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a
given moment in history.”
 Ford argued that “there are few fixed
principles among the handful of precedents.” In one sense, Ford is right. If
the House votes articles of impeachment, the vote cannot be challenged in
court. The Constitution gives the House sole authority over impeachment. So if
the House votes articles of impeachment for any reason, the official is
impeached and must stand trial in the Senate. But in another sense, Ford is
clearly wrong. The framers of the Constitution did not give Congress absolute
power to remove judges and executive officials. It wanted Congress to use its
impeachment power only in extreme circumstances, when an official had committed
 “treason, bribery, or other
high crimes and misdemeanors.”
 The separation of powers
depends on Congress limiting impeachments to these cases.
In
1972, Richard Nixon won a landslide reelection to a second term as president.
During the election, burglars, with links to the White House, had been caught
breaking into Democratic headquarters at the Watergate Hotel in Washington. The burglary
drew little press attention at the time. But it would lead to events that
ultimately brought down the president. Nixon may or may not have had advance
knowledge of the burglary. He probably feared, however, that its investigation
might uncover evidence of political spying and the illegal use of campaign
funds on the part of his administration. So he took an
active role in obstructing the
investigation
. He discussed raising hush money for the burglars and enlisted
the FBI and CIA in squelching the investigation. In 1974, the House Judiciary
committee voted three articles of impeachment. One accused Nixon of obstruction
of justice. Another accused him of abuse of power. The third charged him with
contempt of Congress for defying the committee’s requests to produce documents.
Nixon resigned the presidency before the whole House voted on the articles.
The
committee had declined to vote an article of impeachment against Nixon for tax
evasion. The committee did not believe this was an impeachable offense. It
based its conclusion on a staff report, “Constitutional Grounds for
Presidential Impeachment,” which the committee had ordered prepared before
beginning its investigation. This report traced the history, precedents, and
grounds for impeachment. The report concluded:
Not
all presidential misconduct is sufficient to constitute grounds for
impeachment. . . . Because impeachment of a President is a grave step for the
nation, it is predicated only upon conduct seriously incompatible with either
the constitutional form and principles of our government or the proper
performance of constitutional duties of the presidential office.
The
same year Yale Law School
professor Charles L. Black published a highly influential book,
Impeachment: A Handbook.
Oct
7, 1998
by Charles
Black Jr.
Black
agreed that impeachment is a grave step that should be taken most cautiously.
Impeaching a president overturns an election. Black’s research led him to the
conclusion that a president should be impeached only for “serious assaults on
the integrity of the processes of government,” or for “such crimes as would so
stain a president as to make his continuance in office dangerous to public
order.” 
Black’s
book cited two examples of presidential misconduct that would not merit
impeachment: (1) a president brings a female minor across a state line for
“immoral purposes” in violation of federal law and (2) a president obstructs
justice by helping hide marijuana for a White House intern. Black considered it
“preposterous” to impeach a president for these acts. These examples would
prove relevant to President Clinton’s impeachment case more than 20 years
later.

Bill Clinton

Bill
Clinton was elected president in 1992 and reelected in 1996. During his first
term, an independent counsel was appointed to investigate
·        Whitewater, an Arkansas
land deal involving Clinton
that had taken place about 20 years previously. The counsel’s investigation
later expanded to include scandals surrounding the
·        firing of White House staff in its travel office,
·        the misuse of FBI files, and
·        an illicit affair that the president had
with a White House intern. In 1998, Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr issued a
report to the House Judiciary Committee.
It
found 11 possible impeachable offenses, all related to the intern scandal.
Based on the independent counsel’s investigation, the House Judiciary Committee
voted four articles of impeachment. The first article accused the president of
committing 
·        perjury before a grand jury
convened by the independent counsel. The
·        second charged him with
providing
 “perjurious, false and misleading testimony”
in a civil case related to the scandal
. The
·        third accused him of obstructing justice to “delay,
impede, cover up and conceal the existence” of evidence
 related to the scandal. The
·        fourth charged that he misused
and abused his office by
 deceiving the American public, misleading his cabinet and
other employees so that they would
·        mislead the public, asserting
executive privilege to hinder the investigation, and refusing to respond to the
committee and misleading the committee about the scandal. 
During
the Judiciary Committee’s hearings, experts testified on what constituted “high
crimes and misdemeanors.” The experts called by the Democrats argued that none
of the allegations against the president rose to the level of “high crimes and
misdemeanors.” These experts echoed the reasoning found in the 1974 staff
report and Professor Charles Black’s book on impeachment.
The
experts called by the Republicans disagreed. They pointed out that federal
judges had been removed from office for perjury. They further argued that the
president had taken an oath to uphold all the laws and he had violated his duties
as the nation’s chief law enforcement officer.
For
Discussion and Writing
Explain
the impeachment process.
Why
do you think the framers of the Constitution made the House and Senate
responsible for impeachments and not the judicial branch?
In
your opinion, what are high crimes and misdemeanors?  

A C T I V I T Y

 In
this activity, students role play members of the House Judiciary Committee
deciding whether hypothetical cases constitute “high crimes and misdemeanors.”
Divide the class into small groups. Each group will role play House Judiciary
Committee. Do the following: 
Read
and discuss each of the four hypothetical cases.
Decide
for each case whether the action described in it constitutes a “high crime
and  misdemeanor.”
Prepare
to report your decisions and the reasons for them to the rest of the class.
Hypothetical
Case #1
The
president, after a long feud, has killed a political opponent. The state in
which the killing occurred has indicted the president for murder.
Hypothetical
Case #2
The
president has committed bigamy. His previous wife left him 30 years ago, but he
failed to get a proper divorce before remarrying. He made false statements on
the forms he filled out to get a marriage license.
Hypothetical
Case #3
The
president has secretly sent assassins to kill a hostile foreign leader. This
violates U.S.
law. 
Hypothetical
Case #4
The
president has just pardoned five high-ranking members of his administration who
had been convicted and sentenced to five years in prison for bribery. The
president had nothing to do with the bribery scandal. 
©
2016 CRF-USA •
 Constitutional Rights Foundation, 601 South Kingsley Drive, Los Angeles, CA 90005, (213) 487-5590 Fax (213)
386-0459
 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
This entry was posted in Uncategorized.
Bookmark the permalink.
·                                 

·                                 
·                                 

·                                Recent Posts

§                                              High
Crimes and Misdemeanors: A Critical Perspective
§                                              9/11
Commission Member: ‘Saudi Arabia Supported the Terrorist Attacks’
§                                              EMAILGATE:
The Back Story Is So Radioactive Clinton Is Running For President To Stay Out
Of Prison
§                                              Trump’s
Longtime Butler Says Obama Should Have Been “Shot As An Enemy Agent”
§                                              Federal
judge rules Obamacare is being funded unconstitutionally
§                                              The
FBI Is Keeping 80,000 Secret Files on the Saudis and 9/11
§                                              Why
did the FBI detain Bob Graham?
§                                              GOP
INSIDER SAYS PRESIDENT TRUMP WOULD NAME RUDY GIULIANI AS HOMELAND SECURITY
SECRETARY
§                                              Sanders:
Nominating Clinton would be ‘disaster’ for party, nation
§                                              Trump
Looks to Giuliani to Solve Muslim ‘Problem’
§                                              Donald
Trump Arrives For “Showdown” With Paul Ryan In Washington
§                                              Agents
of the US Guvment Sometimes Get Their Comeuppence
§                                              TRUMP
FLIP FLOPS ONLY DAYS AFTER SAYING HE’D DEFAULT – NOW SAYS HE’LL HYPERINFLATE
§                                              DAVID
CRAYFORD Addresses False Information About M1, Neil Keenan
§                                              San
Andreas fault is about to crack – here’s what will happen when it does
§                                              Is
A Trump Tsunami On The Way?
§                                              Sofia
Smallstorm Unraveling Sandy Hook
§                                              CERN:
Biggest Science Scam in History
§                                              The
Five Stages of Awakening … to the Reality of the Worldy Realm
§                                              The
Bush Family’s Project Hammer
§                                              Trump
Calls For U.S. Debt Default
§                                              Fatal
accidents involving stoned drivers soared in Washington since pot was legalized
§                                              RE:
When will the American people wake up?
§                                              Did
An ICE Agent Just Commit Suicide To Warn The American People?
§                                              Obama:
The Most Radically Pro-Abortion President In US History
§                                              Pro-Life
Advocate Shares Moment Of Truth
§                                              North
Carolina officials sue US Justice Dept over challenge to bathroom law
§                                              Yo,
Bernie: The Clinton Foundation Is “A Charity Fraud!”
§                                              These
Are The 8 Triggers For A New Financial Crisis
§                                              Will
Trump Fire Paul Ryan?
§                                              EXECUTIVE
ORDER — Facilitation of a Presidential Transition
§                                              FLAKKA:
A New Dangerous Synthetic Drug On The Rise
§                                              CIRCUMCISION:
Male Genital Mutilation Finally Ruled Against In A Western Nation
§                                              A
Pernicious And Deadly Cancer Has Infected The Body Politic …
§                                              Physician’s
Permanent Medical Exemption: Based on Contraindications to Vaccinations
§                                              Harvard
Mumps Outbreak: All of the Infected Were Vaccinated
§                                              For
Russia & China, It’s “Accept American Hegemony” Or “Go To War”
§                                              ‘Facilitation
of Presidential Transition’
§                                              Republican
Party Breaking Up Over Trump
§                                              Why
do Russia and China still dance with the criminally insane and psychopathic
leadership of the West?
§                                              Tornadoes
hit Colorado, causing injuries and damaging campers (VIDEOS)
§                                              Awesome
Footage of Tornado in Colorado—Best Ever!
§                                              TRUMP:
The NWO Cabal’s Nuclear Option—To Declare A US, Inc. Bankruptcy
§                                              Is
A Donald Trump Presidency A Sign Of An Impending US Bankruptcy?
§                                              For
Stan Druckenmiller This Is “The Endgame” – His Full ‘Apocalyptic’ Presentation
§                                              Wall
Street ‘Whistleblower’ Analyst Exposes Clinton Foundation As “Charity Fraud”
§                                              Censored,
Surveilled, Watch Listed and Jailed: The Absurdity of Being a Citizen in the
American Police State
§                                              What’s
In a Middle Name?
§                                              Gonzales
confirmed: war criminal to head US Justice Department
§                                              Condoleezza
Rice, Charged with War Crimes at Rutgers, withdraws as Commencement Speaker
§                                              There’s
a ‘Special Place in Hell’ for Madeleine Albright
§                                              Janet
Reno Was Responsible For The Branch Davidian Waco Massacre
§                                              Colin
Powell Lied to the UN: Following Orders Is No Excuse
§                                              Why Highly Flawed ‘Minority’ Leaders Are Always
Chosen To Greatly Advance The NWO Agenda
§                                              The
Straight Skinny and What You Need to Do
§                                              REALITY
CHECK: General Dunford acting as POTUS is debunked
§                                              It
Looks Like Nothing’s Gonna Change!
§                                              Hillary
Clinton To Face FBI Interview Within Weeks, CBS Reports
§                                              Gowdy:
Obama Administration Dragging Benghazi Investigation
§                                              Former
Goldman Sachs Elite Becomes Trump’s Financial Chairman
§                                              Americans
Distracted By The Transgender Bathroom Argument While 3 Nuclear Disasters
Unfold
§                                              TORCHING
OF THE ILLUMINATI HAS BEGUN
§                                              Bush
Admits Membership in Secret Society
§                                              History
Channel Reveals History of Conspiracies from the Templars to Skull and Bones
§                                              George
W. Bush White House’s ‘Skull and Bones’ files due out
§                                              Sheldon
Adelson Says He Will Support Donald Trump
§                                              Deep
State Democrats & The Donald
§                                              Big
Banks Just Claimed A Constitutional Right To A Taxpayer Subsidy
§                                              Federal
Judge May Order Hillary Clinton To Testify In Ongoing Email Controversy
§                                              Fort
McMurray Wildfire in Alberta Grows, Firefighters Hope for Rain
§                                              Trump
tells Janet Yellen: “You’re Fired!”
§                                              Donald
Trump Likes Low Interest Rates But Says He’d Replace Yellen
§                                              The
Federal Reserve is Above the Law
§                                              The
Federal Reserve Is A PRIVATELY OWNED Corporation
§                                              German
Study Proves It – 95% Of Greek “Bailout” Money Went To The Banks
§                                              Powerful
Feminists Reject Hillary
§                                              Trump
Picks Former Goldman Partner And Soros Employee As Finance Chairman
§                                              MOSSAD
Fingerprints All Over The 9/11 False Flag Terror Attacks
§                                              Will
Senator Ben Sasse Run as a Third Party Conservative Against Trump and Clinton?
§                                              Perfect
PHOTO-OP:
 The Donald & Company
§                                              PUTIN
vs. OBAMA
§                                              Hacker
‘Guccifer’: I Got Inside Hillary Clinton’s Server
§                                              GUN
GRAB: Obama’s Last Act Of Tyranny
§                                              Social
Security Admin. Moves to Strip 75,000 Americans of 2nd Amendment Right
§                                              SANDY
HOOK: A FEMA drill to promote gun control
§                                              Sandy
Hook & FEMA
§                                              Geoengineering,
Runaway Climate Disintegration, And Programmed Societal Apathy
§                                              Serial
arsonist targeting Calgary home worries neighbours
§                                              Canadian
Conflagration: Who Did the Alberta ‘Firegeddon’ and Why Now?
§                                              ‘Betrayal’:
Mayerthorpe fire chief reacts to arson charges against volunteer firefighter
§                                              Firefighters
who start fires: a look at the phenomenon of ‘firefighter arson’
§                                              License
To Steal: Italy’s Highest Court Rules “Theft Not A Crime If Hungry”
§                                              Slippery
Road to WWIII! Moldavian Deputies Try to Block US Tanks From Entering Moldova
§                                              “Bankers
Will Choose To Fly Instead Of Die”
§                                              Our
Government v. Their Government
§                                              ‘We
are not bound by The Constitution. They are.’
§                                              Lyin’
Losin’ Ted Gets Cruzified … On Televangelist Channel
§                                              It’s
Time For Bernie To Go For The Jugular!
§                                              AONYMOUS
DECLARES WAR ON THE BANKING CARTELS
§                                              Inside
the Assassination Complex
§                                              SNOWDEN:
“WE ARE LIKE TAGGED ANIMALS”
§                                              Is
America Destined to Become Like Sodom and Gomorrah?
§                                              Gay
Group ‘More Powerful than the NRA,’ Warns North Carolina Governor
§                                              LGBTTTT AGENDA:
Debasing American Society and Corrupting The Planetary Civilization
§                                              The
gender agenda in the war on normality
§                                              Scalia’s
Dead, Now Supreme Court Grants FBI Remote Access to ANY Computer in the US
§                                              ‘Our
economic system is designed to fail’ – Ron Paul
§                                              CLASH
OF THE YEAR: Germany vs. Greece
§                                              Russia
Today Declares 9/11 Was An Inside Job!
§                                              ‘Everything
You Thought You Knew About 9/11 is Wrong!’
§                                              Texas’s
Toxic Rivers: Fracking Chemicals Seep Into Waterways After Floods
§                                              Gold
Surges To Jan 2015 Highs, Tops $1300 As Euro Hits 9-Month High
§                                              Puerto
Rico Says Will Default Tomorrow, Begs Congress For Help “Or Else Crisis Will
Get Worse”
§                                              Seymour
Hersh Says Hillary Approved Sending Libya’s Sarin To Syrian Rebels
§                                              Puerto
Rico to DEFAULT on its debts Monday 2 May – Could Trigger US Bank Collapse
§                                              Jimmy
Walter: 9/11 Truth Interview Reveals How The Movement Was Destroyed
§                                              9/11
WTC: $166 BILLION IN BULLION MISSING
§                                              Craig
Wright revealed as Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto
§                                              Trump
accuses China of ‘raping’ US with unfair trade policy
§                                              Bernie
Sanders’ Brilliant Plan to Force a Contested Convention
§                                              Nobody
Died at Sandy Hook
§                                              SANDY
HOOK REVISITED: The Life of Adam
§                                              New
York Times chief executive accused of discrimination
§                                              What’s
the difference between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism?
§                                              Laus
Deo
§                                              The
secretive, billionaire–backed plans to harness fusion
§                                              Comedian
Tears Up Obama, the Media and NWO Gatekeepers
§                                              Obama
Is Suffocating Business Investment and the Economy
§                                              Seymour
Hersh Says Hillary Approved Sending Libya’s Sarin to Syrian Rebels
§                                              Why
Obama Opposes Brexit
§                                              President
Obama: The Race for the Imperial Legacy
§                                              Mass
Shootings In The U.S. & Antidepressants: Connect The Dots
§                                              GOLD
BREAKOUT 2016: It’s Only A Matter When, Not If
§                                              Which
Is The Real American Government?
§                                              Michael
Bloomberg & Bloomberg.com: A Long Overdue Exposé
§                                              Third
Party Bernie!?!
§                                              GREEK
DEFAULT 2016: A Bankruptcy Which Cannot Be Avoided
§                                              Driverless
Trucks Already Being Tested; Three Million-Plus Truck Drivers to Lose Their
Jobs Soon
§                                              ‘AMERICA’S
PROPHET’ CALLS OUT OBAMA, SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
§                                              OBAMA
DEMANDS MILITARY SUPPORT FOR POSSIBLE WAR AGAINST RUSSIA
§                                              Is
Obama Preparing For War With Russia?
§                                              Sanders
Shows His True Colors
§                                              A
Call to Action: Overcoming the Triumph of Fear
§                                              Chernobyl
Nuclear Disaster: A Terrorist Attack By The Usual Suspects
§                                              6
Reasons Why Most Scientific Research Is Fake, False Or Fraudulent
§                                              Empire
Files: Abby Martin Exposes What Hillary Clinton Really Represents
§                                              Modus
Operandi of Satanists – Recognizing the Hidden Hand
§                                              Let’s
Get This Straight, Once and For All….
§                                              Natural Born Citizen:
Legal Definition Explained By Expert Attorney
§                                              US
Empire Goes Berserk: Unleashes Legal Jackals On All Perceived Enemies For
Financial Expropriation
·                                

·                                Archives

§                                              May
2016
§                                              April
2016
§                                              March
2016
§                                              February
2016
§                                              January
2016
§                                              December
2015
§                                              November
2015
§                                              October
2015
§                                              September
2015
§                                              August
2015
§                                              July
2015
§                                              June
2015
§                                              May
2015
§                                              April
2015
§                                              March
2015
§                                              February
2015
§                                              January
2015
§                                              December
2014
§                                              November
2014
§                                              October
2014
§                                              September
2014
§                                              August
2014
§                                              July
2014
§                                              June
2014
§                                              May
2014
§                                              April
2014
§                                              March
2014
§                                              February
2014
§                                              January
2014
§                                              December
2013
§                                              November
2013
§                                              October
2013
§                                              September
2013
§                                              August
2013
§                                              January
2013
§                                              December
2012
§                                              November
2012
§                                              October
2012
§                                              September
2012
§                                              August
2012
§                                              July
2012
§                                              June
2012
§                                              May
2012
§                                              March
2012

·                                Categories

§                                              Uncategorized

·                                Meta

§                                              Log
in
§                                              Entries RSS
§                                              Comments RSS
§                                              WordPress.org


No comments: