EDITOR'S CHOICE | 26.05.2016
State Sponsors of Terrorism: US Planned and Carried out 9/11 Attacks, but Blames Other Countries for Them Out
MEMRI - Middle East Media Research Institute
On
the eve of President Obama’s April 2016 visit to Saudi Arabia, the U.S.
Congress began debating the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act
(JASTA), that would, inter alia, allow the families of victims of the
September 11 attacks to sue the Saudi government for damages. Also in
April 2016, the New York Times published that a 2002 congressional
inquiry into the 9/11 attacks had found that Saudi officials living in
the United States at the time had a hand in the plot. The commission’s
conclusions, said the paper, were specified in a report that has not
been released publicly.[1]
The
JASTA bill, which was passed by the Senate on May 17, 2016, triggered
fury in Saudi Arabia, expressed both in statements by the Saudi foreign
minister and in scathing attacks on the U.S. in the Saudi press.[2] On
April 28, 2016, the London-based Saudi daily Al-Hayatpublished an
exceptionally harsh article on this topic by Saudi legal expert Katib
Al-Shammari, who argued that the U.S. itself had planned and carried out
9/11, while placing the blame on a shifting series of others – first
Al-Qaeda and the Taliban, then Saddam Hussein’s regime in Iraq, and now
Saudi Arabia. He wrote that American threats to reveal documents that
supposedly point to Saudi involvement in 9/11 are part of standard U.S.
policy of exposing archival documents to use as leverage against various
countries – which he calls “victory by means of archives.”
Following are excerpts from Al-Shammari’s article:[3]
”Those
who follow American policy see that it is built upon the principle of
advance planning and future probabilities. This is because it
occasionally presents a certain topic to a country that it does not wish
[to bring up] at that time but [that it is] reserving in its archives
as an ace to play [at a later date] in order to pressure that country.
Anyone revisiting… [statements by] George H.W. Bush regarding Operation
Desert Storm might find that he acknowledged that the U.S. Army could
have invaded Iraq in the 1990s, but that [the Americans] had preferred
to keep Saddam Hussein around as a bargaining chip for [use against]
other Gulf states. However, once the Shi’ite wave began to advance, the
Americans wanted to get rid of Saddam Hussein, since they no longer saw
him as an ace up their sleeve.
“September
11 is one of winning cards in the American archives, because all the
wise people in the world who are experts on American policy and who
analyze the images and the videos [of 9/11] agree unanimously that what
happened in the [Twin] Towers was a purely American action, planned and
carried out within the U.S. Proof of this is the sequence of continuous
explosions that dramatically ripped through both buildings… Expert
structural engineers demolished them with explosives, while the planes
crashing [into them] only gave the green light for the detonation – they
were not the reason for the collapse. But the U.S. still spreads blame
in all directions. [This policy] can be dubbed ‘victory by means of
archives.’
“On
September 11, the U.S. attained several victories at the same time,
that [even] the hawks [who were at that time] in the White House could
not have imagined. Some of them can be enumerated as follows:
“1.
The U.S. created, in public opinion, an obscure enemy – terrorism –
which became what American presidents blamed for all their mistakes, and
also became the sole motivation for any dirty operation that American
politicians and military figures desire to carry out in any country.
[The] terrorism [label] was applied to Muslims, and specifically to
Saudi Arabia.
“2.
Utilizing this incident [9/11], the U.S. launched a new age of global
armament. Everyone wanted to acquire all kinds of weapons to defend
themselves and at the same time battle the obscure enemy, terrorism –
[even though] up to this very moment we do not know the essence of this
terrorism of which the U.S. speaks, except [to say that] that it is
Islamic…
“3.
The U.S. made the American people choose from two bad options: either
live peacefully [but] remain exposed to the danger of death [by
terrorism] at any moment, or starve in safety, because [the country's
budget will be spent on sending] the Marines even as far as Mars to
defend you.
“Lo
and behold, today, we see these archives revealed before us: A New York
court accuses the Iranian regime of responsibility for 9/11, and we
[also] see a bill [in Congress] accusing Saudi Arabia of being behind it
[sic]. This is after the previous Iraqi regime was accused of being
behind it. Al-Qaeda and the Taliban were also blamed for it, and we do
not know who [will be blamed] tomorrow! But [whoever it is], we will not
be surprised at all, since this is the essence of how the American
archives, that are civilized and respect freedoms and democracy,
operate.
“The
nature of the U.S. is that it cannot exist without an enemy… [For
example,] after a period during which it did not fight anyone [i.e.
following World War II], the U.S. created a new kind of war – the Cold
War… Then, when the Soviet era ended, after we Muslims helped the
religions and fought Communism on their [the Americans'] behalf, they
began to see Muslims as their new enemy! The U.S. saw a need for
creating a new enemy – and planned, organized, and carried this out
[i.e. blamed Muslims for terrorism]. This will never end until it [the
U.S.] accomplishes the goals it has set for itself.
“So
why not let these achievements be credited to the American
administration, while insurance companies pay for the damages, whether
domestic or foreign? This, my dear Arab and Muslim, is the policy of the
American archives.”
No comments:
Post a Comment