December 16, 2015 "Information Clearing House" - "Sputnik" - Nobody needs to read Zbigniew “Grand Chessboard” Brzezinski’s 1997 opus to know US foreign policy revolves around one single overarching theme: prevent – by all means necessary – the emergence of a power, or powers, capable of constraining Washington’s unilateral swagger, not only in Eurasia but across the world.The Pentagon carries the same message embedded in newspeak: the Full Spectrum Dominance doctrine.
Syria is leading all these assumptions to collapse like a house of cards. So no wonder in a Beltway under no visible chain of command – the Obama administration barely qualifies as lame duck – angst is the norm.
The
Pentagon is now engaged in a Vietnam-style escalation of boots on the
ground across “Syraq”. 50 commandos are already in northern Syria
“advising” the YPG Syrian Kurds as well as a few “moderate” Sunnis.
Translation: telling them what Washington wants them to do. The official
White House spin is that these commandos “support local forces”
(Obama’s words) in cutting off supply lines leading to the fake
“Caliphate” capital, Raqqa.
Another
200 Special Forces sent to Iraq will soon follow, allegedly to “engage
in direct combat” against the leadership of ISIS/ISIL/Daesh, which is
now ensconced in Mosul.
These
developments, billed as “efforts” to “partially re-engage in Iraq and
Syria” are leading US Think Tankland to pen hilarious reports in search
of “the perfect balance between wide-scale invasion and complete
disengagement” – when everyone knows Washington will never disengage
from the Middle East’s strategic oil wealth.
All
these American boots on the ground in theory should be coordinating,
soon, with a new, spectacularly surrealist 34-country “Islamic”
coalition (Iran was not invited), set up to fight ISIS/ISIL/Daesh by no
less than the ideological matrix of all strands of Salafi-jihadism:
Wahhabi Saudi Arabia.
Syria
is now Coalition Central. There are at least four; the “4+1” (Russia,
Syria, Iran, Iraq plus Hezbollah), which is actually fighting Daesh; the
US-led coalition, a sort of mini NATO-GCC combo, but with the GCC doing
nothing; the Russia-France direct military collaboration; and the new
Saudi-led “Islamic” charade. They are pitted against an astonishing
number of Salafi-jhadi coalitions and alliances of convenience that last
from a few months to a few hours.
And then there’s Turkey, which under Sultan Erdogan plays a vicious double game.
Sarajevo All Over Again?
“Tense”
does not even begin to describe the current Russia-Turkey geopolitical
tension, which shows no sign of abating. The Empire of Chaos lavishly
profits from it as a privileged spectator; as long as the tension lasts,
prospects of Eurasia integration are hampered.
Russian
intel has certainly played all possible scenarios involving a NATO
Turkish army on the Turkish-Syrian border as well as the possibility
of Ankara closing the Bosphorus and the Dardanelles for the Russian
“Syria Express”. Erdogan may not be foolish enough to offer Russia yet
another casus belli. But Moscow is taking no chances.
Russia
has placed ships and submarines capable of launching nuclear missiles
in case Turkey under the cover of NATO decides to strike out against the
Russian position. President Putin has been clear; Russia will use
nuclear weapons if necessary if conventional forces are threatened.
If
Ankara opts for a suicide mission of knocking out yet another Su-24, or
Su-34, Russia will simply clear the airspace all across the border
via the S-400s. If Ankara under the cover of NATO responds by launching
the Turkish Army on Russian positions, Russia will use nuclear missiles,
drawing NATO into war not only in Syria but potentially also in Europe.
And this would include using nuclear missiles to keep Russian strategic
use of the Bosphorus open.
That’s how we can draw a parallel of Syria today as the equivalent of Sarajevo 1914.
Since
mid-2014 the Pentagon has run all manner of war games – as many as 16
times, under different scenarios – pitting NATO against Russia. All
scenarios were favorable to NATO. All simulations yielded the same
victor: Russia.
And that’s why Erdogan’s erratic behavior actually terrifies quite a few real players from Washington to Brussels.
Let Me Take You on a Missile Cruise
The
Pentagon is very much aware of the tremendous heavy metal Russia may
unleash if provoked to the limit by someone like Erdogan. Let's roll
out an abridged list.
Russia
can use the mighty SS-18 – which NATO codenames “Satan”; each “Satan”
carries 10 warheads, with a yield of 750 to 1000 kilotons each, enough
to destroy an area the size of New York state.
The
Topol M ICBM is the world's fastest missile at 21 Mach (16,000 miles an
hour); against it, there’s no defense. Launched from Moscow, it hits
New York City in 18 minutes, and L.A. in 22.8 minutes.
Russian
submarines – as well as Chinese submarines – are able to launch
offshore the US, striking coastal targets within a minute. Chinese
submarines have surfaced next to US aircraft carriers undetected, and
Russian submarines can do the same.
The
S-500 anti-missile system is capable of sealing Russia off from ICBMs
and cruise missiles. (Moscow will only admit on the record that the
S-500s will be rolled out in 2016; but the fact the S-400s will soon be
delivered to China implies the S-500s may be already operational.)
The S-500 makes the Patriot missile look like a V-2 from WWII.
Here,
a former adviser to the US Chief of Naval Operations essentially goes
on the record saying the whole US missile defense apparatus is
worthless.
Russia
has a supersonic bomber fleet of Tupolev Tu-160s; they can take
off from airbases deep in the heart of Russia, fly over the North Pole,
launch nuclear-tipped cruise missiles from safe distances over the
Atlantic, and return home to watch the whole thing on TV.
Russia
can cripple virtually every forward NATO base with tactical – or
battlefield – small-yield nuclear weapons. It’s not by accident that
Russia over the past few months tested NATO response times in multiple
occasions.
The
Iskander missile travels at seven times the speed of sound with a range
of 400 km. It’s deadly to airfields, logistics points and other
stationary infrastructure along a broad war theatre, for instance
in southern Turkey.
NATO
would need to knock out all these Iskanders. But then they would need
to face the S-400s – or, worse, S-500s — which Russia can layer
in defense zones in nearly every conceivable theater of war. Positioning
the S-400s in Kaliningrad, for instance, would cripple all NATO air
operations deep inside Europe.
And
presiding over military decisions, Russia privileges the use
of Reflexive Control (RC). This is a tactic that aims to convey selected
information to the enemy that forces him into making self-defeating
decisions; a sort of virus influencing and controlling his
decision-making process. Russia uses RC tactically, strategically and
geopolitically. A young Vladimir Putin learned all there is to know
about RC at the 401st KGB School and further on in his career as a
KGB/FSB officer.
All right, Erdogan and NATO; do you still wanna go to war?
Pepe
Escobar is an analyst for RT and TomDispatch, and a frequent
contributor to websites and radio shows ranging from the US to East
Asia. Born in Brazil, he's been a foreign correspondent since 1985, and
has lived in London, Paris, Milan, Los Angeles, Washington, Bangkok and
Hong Kong.
Banned German satire "Die Anstalt". Media double standards on Russia and Ukraine
The
scandal episode of the German political satire program 'Die Anstalt'
about the media leaders' ties to lobby organisations and their use of
enemy images in the Ukrainian conflict
No comments:
Post a Comment