Roland San Juan: David Icke Newsletter - May 5th 2013 -- The Boston Bombing

"Former Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra said in sworn testimony: You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security.

This is the political logic that lies behind all the massacres and the bombings which remain unpunished, because the state cannot convict itself or declare itself responsible for what happened.

In other words ... Problem-Reaction-Solution."

Thanks to: Jerry Zimmer

The David Icke Newsletter, May 5th, 2013

THE BOSTON BOMBING ...

... WHAT WE'RE NOT BEING TOLD

Hello all ...

I have been writing since the early 1990s about the two prime techniques of perception manipulation and global transformation that I call Problem-Reaction-Solution and the Totalitarian Tiptoe and both came together so blatantly with the bombings at the Boston Marathon which killed three people and reportedly injured nearly 200.

When events like this happen I like to take my time assessing the information rather than jumping in with a conclusion unless from past experience what has happened is obvious. On that score it was clear very quickly that what happened in Boston was staged, but the detail of exactly how it happened and many of the multiple reasons for why will take longer to assess. A good researcher remains open to all possibility until enough evidence accrues to point the way, but there is already enough to make some basic conclusions.

First the background that is obvious ...

The bombs are said to have been carried in backpacks and there were corporate-military operatives all over the scene before the bombs went off carrying backpacks. This creates a situation akin to those street magicians who put a ball under one of three cups and then move them around and ask you to guess which cup covers the ball.

There were so many backpacks and so which ones contained the bombs? Who knows? - and that's the idea. In fact, who knows for sure that they were even connected to backpacks? They may have been but the only reason that people think this is the case is because the police have said so.

Excuse me, but I gave up believing anything the police said without confirming evidence a very long time ago. But they showed us an exploded backpack? And? How simple is that?

It is so easy even for those who question official stories to be lulled into the acceptance of certain 'facts' when they are only 'facts' because they were announced by the authorities and repeated to death by the media until they become an 'everyone knows that'.

I shake my head often when I see media news presenters saying of a situation - 'Well, what we know is this ...' They then reel off a series of unquestioned 'facts' that are nothing more than what the authorities have said is true. Mostly, as experience has shown again and again, these 'facts' are actually lies and half-truths.

It is vital, therefore, when we are faced with events such as Boston that we clear our minds and face a blank sheet of paper with no preconceived ideas and let the evidence have its say; that is the evidence, not police and government statements. They need to be ignored, or at least put on the backburner, until credible evidence is produced in support of what they say.

Look through the accepted story of Sandy Hook and you will find little that has not come from official statements supported by no evidence whatsoever.

'What we know is ...'

Oh no, you don't. You only 'know' what you have been told to 'know'.

Two things that we we actually do know about Boston are that corporate-military personnel can be seen in photographs all around the finish line before the bombings and there was a 'practice' drill going on that mirrored what subsequently happened. The mainstream media has ignored, even ridiculed the latter, when multiple witnesses have confirmed this is true.

One 'journalist' wrote an article on the day of the Boston bombings headed: 'Why the Conspiracy Theorists Will Have a Tough Time With Boston'. A catalogue of inaccuracies and ignorance followed. As Noam Chomsky once said: 'The intellectual tradition is one of servility to power, and if I didn't betray it I'd be ashamed of myself.'

This 'journalist', David Weigel at Slate.com, went on to ridicule and condemn the fact that an alternative proper journalist had questioned the official story at a Boston police press conference and in doing so Weigel revealed the true depth of ignorance and arrogance that dominates mainstream 'news'.

He said that there were too many cameras around in Boston for conspiracy theories to take root when the very opposite was the case. The cameras revealed what the authorities did not want us to see. Weigel said that this was unlike other conspiracy theories about Bohemian Grove, Pentagon damage on 9/11, the Kennedy assassination, Sandy Hook and Aurora where there 'were no video cameras rolling'.

It was too much for his mainstream mind to consider why there was no video footage at such a public and camera-swamped location as the Pentagon and why we have seen no footage from security cameras at Sandy Hook school and the Aurora movie theatre.

Weigel also said that there was no politician that would gain from the Boston attack, so revealing the stunning levels of naivety and lack of awareness in mainstream 'journalism' on which, irony of ironies, the very conspiracy that it denies depends upon to avoid exposure and sell its fake cover stories.

He then mocked suggestions that the bombing would be used for the further militarization of the streets because this is something that is 'already under way'. Yes, you silly person - and justified by previous staged events like 9/11 that you believed were real. It truly is a challenge to overestimate just what an irrelevance to human understanding that the corporate media has become.

But Weigel saved his most outrageous comments for his denial that any loudspeakers at the marathon were telling people to be calm because a drill was going on, or that bomb-sniffing dogs were in attendance. This is a quote from athletics coach Ali Stevenson on Local 15 TV who completed his run just before the first bomb went off:

'They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about. It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill.'

Stevenson also said that he had competed in the biggest marathons all over the world and had never seen security like there was at this one - long before there was any sign of trouble. Click here for the video report ...

Sniffer dogs at the Boston marathon, but don't worry, they weren't really there.

It is dawning on more and more people that the mainstream media is not only an irrelevance in terms of telling the truth about what is going on, but, through ignorance and outright censorship, misleads and misdirects people on behalf of the forces that own and control it. Audiences for mainstream 'news' have been plummeting for this very reason.

This leaves the alternative, mostly Internet media, to pick through the lies and diversions to get as close to the truth as possible and this is a responsibility that must be respected through calm and careful research that does not rush to judgement and issue definitive explanations until the evidence supports the case.

The evidence at this stage clearly points to government-military involvement in the Boston attacks long before we get to the fine detail which takes much longer to expose and often, given the multi-layers of secrecy and compartmentalisation, you never do uncover everything there is to know.

What makes the themes easier to spot, however, is that the foundation 'blueprint' of staged events like Boston is repeated time and again and this includes the 'drill' that runs side-by-side with real events. The list of these is now getting ridiculous. There were mirror-drills happening in or near the same locations as the real attacks in the case of ... 9/11, the 7/7 London bombings, the Oslo bombing, the Madrid train bombings, Aurora, Sandy Hook, Boston, and so on.

The drill is the excuse to have corporate-military personnel all over the scene or in the close vicinity and while most may genuinely think they are taking part in a practice scenario the key players will know the real story and be able to operate behind the cover of the drill.

It also offers the opportunity to recruit people who think they are playing the part of fake bombers in the drill to be caught on camera in the wrong place at the wrong time and be blamed for a real bombing instigated by the Hidden Hand. Boston had all these elements and potential possibilities.

These are some of the corporate-military personnel at the scene of the Boston bombings before they happened ...

... and here they are running away afterwards - one apparently now without a backpack. There were many of these people at the scene in the same clothing, often with backpacks, and their uniform fits that of an organisation called Craft International. This specialises in 'military, law-enforcement and civilian training, as well as private security and protection'.

Craft was established by former Navy Seal Chris Kyle who was described as a devout Christian while also claiming to be the most lethal sniper in American military history. I guess he must have missed the bit about thou shalt not kill and turning the other cheek.

Kyle was shot dead with his associate Chad Littlefield in February 2013 apparently by 'a troubled veteran whom they were trying to help', according to a Craft International statement. It added that Kyle had 'a profound effect on the lives of those he touched'. Yes, I guess with a record-breaking sniper that does tend to happen.

Craft International is one of a series of private 'security' companies mostly run by former military personnel that are contracted (a few officially, many unofficially) by the US government to carry out operations that can be done at arm's length from official channels. The most notorious of these is Blackwater which keeps changing its name to hide its history. It became Xe Services before the current cover name of Academi.

Blackwater was founded in 1997 by Erik Prince, another former Seal, with the familiar brief of providing 'training support to military and law enforcement organizations' and it has operated widely in Afghanistan and Iraq where many have died controversially at its hands.

So here you had personnel from Craft International, a 'private' military 'training and support' organisation, on and around the finish line of the Boston Marathon before the bombs went off and the authorities have simply refused to answer questions from the alternative media about what they were doing there or the fact that a drill, including sniffer dogs, was happening at the time. They did not have to refuse to answer the same questions from the mainstream media because they were never asked.

The 'men in black' at the scene were at first connected to Navy Seals because of their badge, but this is also used by Craft International, no doubt because of its Navy Seal connections through the late Chris Kyle.

Kyle and the Craft International logo.

Even what has been established this far should make anyone with a mind to call their own start to doubt the official story given that the authorities are lying about the drill and refusing to answer basic questions about what Craft International was doing at the scene.

Problem-Reaction-Solution or 'false-flag' staged attacks fall into three main categories:1) When elements within the government-military complex plant the bomb and blame innocent patsies; 2) When they covertly agent-provocateur others to plant the bombs (a speciality of the FBI); 3) When the government-military complex is aware of a genuine plot and allows it to happen when it could have been stopped.

With all the military and military-connected personnel caught on camera in the most significant locations, and wearing backpacks before the Boston 'backpack bombs' went off, pick any one from these three.

It is fundamentally significant that one of the brothers blamed for the Boston attacks, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, had connections to US law enforcement and security agencies like the FBI and CIA and he would certainly have been in a position to be set up in a 'drill' or agent provocateur 'sting'.

19-year-old Dzhokhar Tsarnaev among the marathon crowd with his 26-year-old brother Tamerlan.

Their mother, Zubeidat Tsarnaeva, said that her eldest son, Tamerlan, who was killed by the police, was under the control of the FBI - an organisation notorious for covertly setting up targets through its agents and informants to plan terrorist attacks and then either claiming to have foiled them just in time or allowing them to go ahead when they could have been stopped.

This has prompted bizarre, though accurate, headlines such as: 'The FBI again thwarts its own terror plot'. Examples of this FBI modus operandi include the World Trade Center bombing of 1993; the Oklahoma bombing of 1995; the 'thwarted' attack on Fort Dix personnel in 2007; the 'thwarted' bomb attack in Portland, Oregon, in 2010; and the 'thwarted' attack on a bridge in Ohio in 2012.

Robert Mueller, the head of the FBI at the time of 9/11, continues to run the agency on behalf of those that control him and he has overseen outrageous plots instigated to set up their patsy targets. Even The New York Times reported:

'The United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots in recent years - or so it has seemed. A would-be suicide bomber was intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to bomb synagogues and shoot Stinger missiles at military aircraft was developed by men in Newburgh, N.Y.; and a fanciful idea to fly explosive-laden model planes into the Pentagon and the Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts.

But all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake C-4 explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training. Suspects naïvely played their parts until they were arrested.'

Writer and researcher Trevor Aaronson studied the history of FBI-created 'terror plots' for his book, The Terror Factory. He said of these FBI patsy 'terrorists':

'They're actually almost entirely bumbling morons who couldn't tie their own shoes or buy the laces without FBI instigation and support. The FBI plants the ideas, makes the plans, provides the fake weapons and money, creates the attempted act of terrorism, makes an arrest, and announces the salvation of the nation.

Over and over again. The procedure has become so regular that intended marks have spotted the sting being worked on them simply by Googling the name or phone number of the bozo pretending to recruit them into the terrorist brotherhood, and discovering that he's a serial informant ...

... Most of the rest charged with "terrorism" had little or nothing to do with terrorism at all, most of them charged with more minor offenses like immigration offenses or making false statements. Three or four people out of the whole list appear to be men whom one would reasonably call terrorists in the commonly accepted sense of the word.'

Mother Jones magazine and the Investigative Reporting Program at the University of California-Berkeley investigated the cases of 508 defendants in terrorism-related cases and found the following:

* Nearly half the prosecutions involved the use of informants, many of them 'incentivized' by money (operatives can be paid as much as $100,000 per assignment) or the need to work off criminal or immigration violations.

* Sting operations resulted in prosecutions against 158 defendants. Of that total, 49 defendants participated in plots led by an agent provocateur - an FBI operative instigating terrorist action.

* With three exceptions, all of the high-profile domestic terror plots of the last decade were actually FBI stings.

* In many sting cases, key encounters between the informant and the target were not recorded - making it hard for defendants claiming entrapment to prove their case.

It is against this background that we should consider the connections between the two alleged Boston bombers and the FBI.

Their mother said of elder son, Tamerlan:

'My son, he was set up. He was counselled by the FBI for 3 to 5 year. They knew what my son was doing and what actions and what sites on the internet he was going. They used to come home; they used to come and talk to me; they used to tell me that they are counselling ...'

His father, Anzor Tsarnaev, said the FBI had watched his son closely and visited him at home:

'Yes, I was there. It was in Cambridge [Massachusetts]. They said: "We know what sites you are on, we know where you are calling, we know everything about you. Everything." They said we are checking and watching - that's what they said.'

The Russian newspaper Izvestia claims to be in possession of documents leaked from the Republic of Georgia Interior Ministry which reveal that Tamerlan Tsarnaev attended seminars in Georgia between January and July of 2012 arranged by the Washington-based Jamestown Foundation which was established in 1984 by CIA Director William Casey and remains extremely close to the CIA.

The seminars also involved an organisation known to be associated with the Jamestown Foundation called the Caucasus Fund which was founded after the Georgia-Russia conflict in 2008 with the aim of recruiting intelligence operatives to work in southern Russia.

The Tsarnaev family is of Chechen origin and separatists in Chechnya in the North Caucasus have fought an overt and covert war for independence from Russia although this has diminished in the last few years.

The Jamestown Foundation brings us to major global conspiracy asset, Zbigniew Brzezinski, the former National Security Advisor to President Carter, co-founder with David Rockefeller of the cabal's Trilateral Commission, and, by his own statements, the man who drew the Soviet Union into its disastrous invasion of Afghanistan by arming and training Afghan terrorists to target the Soviet satellite regime then in power in the capital Kabul.

These Brzezinski terrorists became known as the Mujahedeen/Taliban and the US arranged for Osama bin Laden to be despatched to Afghanistan from Saudi Arabia to be the frontman for the resistance to the Soviet invasion before blaming him for 9/11 and using that to justify their own Afghan invasion.

The Jamestown Foundation was established to support Soviet dissidents and you would expect Brzezinski to be involved given his obsessive hatred of Russia. Brzezinski has served on the Jamestown board of directors and anything that he is involved with is serving the interests of the global cabal.

The US industrial-military-intelligence complex has been covertly targeting Russia in the Caucasus as part of its plan to control the entire region known as Eurasia which connects Europe to China and Russia to the Middle East. This includes support for groups seeking the separation of Chechnya from Russia and the propaganda against Iran is also part of this Eurasia agenda. Brzezinski has said that, in effect, he who controls Eurasia controls the world.

Another significant US organisation in the region is the American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus (ACPC), sponsored by the right-wing organization Freedom House, whose board members have included Brzezinski, 9/11 Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and his more powerful 'deputy', Paul Wolfowitz, among many other players in the global conspiracy.

Freedom House is currently chaired by William Howard Taft IV, great-grandson of President William Howard Taft, and he served in both the Reagan and Boy Bush administrations as well as being a permanent representative at NATO. The director of the Jamestown Foundation seminars in the Caucasus last year, allegedly attended by Tamerlan Tsarnaev, was reportedly a former employee of Freedom House.

George Soros, the financial manipulator, Brzezinski associate and Rothschild gofer, has long been heavily involved in the Caucasus region with his front operations like the Open Society Institute and Central Eurasia Project which has sponsored events with the Jamestown Foundation. US investigative journalist Wayne Madsen wrote:

'Upon becoming President in 2009, Barack Obama adopted [Senator John] McCain's proposal and authorized CIA support for North Caucasus secessionists and terrorists with money laundered through the USAID, the National Endowment for Democracy, Soros's Open Society Institute, Freedom House, and the Jamestown Foundation.

In January 2012, Obama appointed a Soros activist and neocon, Michael McFaul of the right-wing Hoover Institution at Stanford University, as U.S. ambassador to Moscow. McFaul immediately threw open the doors of the U.S. embassy to a variety of Russian dissidents, including secessionists from the North Caucasus, some of whom were suspected by the Russian FSB of ties to Islamist terrorists.'

The FBI accepts that it was warned by Russia about the ethnic Chechen Tamerlan Tsarnaev in 2011. Agents interviewed him and members of his family, but an FBI statement said it found no evidence against him of terrorist activity of any kind.

Tsarnaev travelled to Chechnya's Russian neighbour Dagestan on the Caspian Sea in 2012 where members of his family now live and he was allowed to move around freely before leaving which doesn't fit with the Russian concern about his potential terrorist activities against them.

In fact, very little fits because there is a whole other story that we are not being told. US Secretary of State John Kerry stated that Tamerlan Tsarnaev had been 'radicalised' during a six-month visit to Dagestan and Chechnya in 2012 - the time of the Jamestown seminars.

It is becoming ever clearer that the Tsarnaev family, both in Dagestan and America, has many connections to US intelligence and law enforcement agencies and this is why the mother can be so adamant that her sons were set up. Her words and manner reveal knowledge of how the game works.

Despite this long backstory that the FBI has with the Tsarnaevs, a few days after the bombings an arrogant and uncomfortable-looking Richard Deslauriers, the FBI special agent in charge of the Boston Division, produced pictures of the brothers at a news conference and asked for the public's help in identifying them. He said:

'Somebody out there knows these individuals as friends, neighbours, co-workers, or family members of the suspects. Though it may be difficult, the nation is counting on those with information to come forward.'

How crazy can you get when they had to know exactly who they were? But this was nothing to do with identifying suspects. It was to introduce them to the public consciousness in preparation for the cover story that was about to be told. With this in mind, Deslauriers said at this same news conference:

'For clarity, these images should be the only ones - the only ones - that the public should view to assist us. Other photos should not be deemed credible and unnecessarily divert the public's attention in the wrong direction and create undue work for vital law enforcement resources.'

Here is our story and nothing is going to be allowed to question or contradict it. By dawn of the next morning Tamerlan Tsarnaev had been killed by police and his brother was on the run.

Then there is the alleged bombers' uncle, Ruslan Tsarni (formerly Tsarnaev), who faced the media immediately after his nephews were named but not yet found and condemned them at the top of his voice.

I thought as I watched him that he was jumping the gun accepting their guilt from no more than a police report and the vehemence of his delivery led me to conclude that he either knew far more than he was saying and/or he wanted to distance himself as comprehensively as possible and protect his own standing and reputation.

What Ruslan Tsarni said, and the way that he said it, was key to confirming in the public mind at this stage that the two men the FBI had highlighted were indeed the Boston bombers. So who is Ruslan Tsarni?

Investigative journalist Wayne Madsen mentioned the connections between USAID, the United States Agency for International Development which has been widely connected to the CIA, and the American organisations manipulating events in the North Caucasus. Bolivian President Evo Morales announced only this week that he is expelling USAID from his country for seeking to 'conspire against' the Bolivian people and government.

Uncle Ruslan, it turns out, was contracted as a 'consultant' to USAID in the former Soviet Republic of Kazakhstan in the early 1990's. The Tsarnaev family lived close to the Kazakhstan border at Tokmok in Kyrgyzstan before moving to the United States. According to Timur Toktonaliev, a Radio Free Europe and Kyrgyz Service correspondent, the Tsarnaevs were well known in Tokmok and lived next door to organized crime boss Aziz Batukaev, himself an ethnic Chechen.

Ruslan Tsarni is described as a lawyer and oil executive and it is worth reading this article at MadCow Morning News headed 'Was Boston Bombers "Uncle Ruslan" with the CIA?' for some very interesting background to this man's activities. Click here ...

You can see the significance of Kazakhstan to the 'control Eurasia' agenda which includes the subjugation of the Caspian Sea countries with their massive reserves of oil and gas. This is another prime reason why they are desperate to attack Iran and look at the other associated countries that have already been invaded or are under attack ... Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Anyway, back to Uncle Ruslan Tsarni. He also established a company in 1995 called The Congress of Chechen International Organizations which sent aid to Islamic terrorists in Chechnya and listed its address as the home of Graham Fuller, the Vice-Chairman of the CIA's National Intelligence Council during the Reagan presidency. Fuller had earlier been CIA National Intelligence Officer for the Near East and South Asia - the very region we are talking about.

Fuller has confirmed this information about Ruslan Tsarni (Tsarnaev) and his company, published again by the MadCow Morning News website. Uncle Ruslan was married to Fuller's daughter and this is the same CIA Graham Fuller who is quoted by intelligence whistleblower Sibel Edmonds as saying:

'The policy of guiding the evolution of Islam and of helping them against our adversaries worked marvellously well in Afghanistan against the Red Army. The same doctrines can still be used to destabilize what remains of Russian power, and especially to counter the Chinese influence in Central Asia.'

The CIA's Graham Fuller and his daughter Samantha Ankara Fuller who was married to Uncle Ruslan.

Sibel Edmonds, an Iranian-American former FBI translator and founder of the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition, also said that Tamerlan Tsarnaev fitted precisely the profile of people the CIA seeks to recruit for operations in the Caucasus and so did the way his mother described the approach by the FBI and his long-term 'counselling' by its agents.

This is the background information that reveals the forces and networks operating behind the cover of the official and ludicrous narrative of the Boston bombings. The US/Britain/NATO alliance is working to destabilise the Russia-controlled countries of the Caucasus using agents, informants and the very Islamic fanatics that it condemns elsewhere when it suits them.

Edmonds translated communications between Islamic radicals in the wake of 9/11 and she says that Bin Laden and his associate, Ayman al-Zawahiri, continued to work with the US government for three months after the attacks to destabilise the Caucasus region in Southern Russia. This was at the same time that the Bush administration was saying that they must invade Afghanistan to 'get Bin Laden'.

Edmonds connects Bin Laden to Operation Gladio which began after the Second World War and specialises in carrying out attacks that are blamed on target groups the instigators wish to demonise and are used to justify increased government powers.

Operation Gladio was the work of British and American intelligence but has involved operatives from many countries, most notably Italy where one of its attacks was the Bologna station bombing in 1980 which killed 85 people and was blamed on a terrorist group called the Red Brigades to demonise communists.

An Italian parliamentary investigation in 2000 heard that the bombing was actually carried out by 'men inside Italian state institutions and ... men linked to the structures of United States intelligence.' Yes, see Henry Kissinger. Former Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra said in sworn testimony:

You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security.

This is the political logic that lies behind all the massacres and the bombings which remain unpunished, because the state cannot convict itself or declare itself responsible for what happened.

In other words ... Problem-Reaction-Solution.

Sibel Edmonds said that Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri worked for NATO and the Pentagon as part of Operation Gladio which continues to this day. She said:

For the past 11 years I have been emphasizing that my State Secrets Privilege and Gag Orders had to do with the FBI files (covering period 1996-2002 February) on covert-terrorist operations in Caucasus and Central Asia backed, managed and armed by US actors. These US-NATO directed operations in the region involved Bin-Laden and mainly Zawahiri ...

... The FBI documents contained damning evidence (audio and written) collected between 1996-2002 tying these terror operations directly to the U.S. persons in the State Department/CIA and Pentagon. Also, how the State Department got Congress to grant huge amounts of funds to 'front' NGOs and businesses (mainly Turkish companies in US-listed/members of ATC) to funnel money to the terrorist cells in this region.

The US and British governments say they must fight Islamic extremism in Afghanistan and elsewhere while arming, funding and training the very same people in Syria, the Caucasus, Libya and other parts of Africa. Those involved are too stupid and mindless to see how they are being manipulated to a common end which includes their own destruction.

The aim is to have these idiots look to US-controlled Saudi Arabia and Qatar for their leadership and guidance - the very two Islamic states at the forefront of supporting the US-controlled Islamic mercenaries in Libya and Syria with money and arms.

Somehow caught up in all this on April 15th, and we may never know exactly how, were Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev at the Boston Marathon. If they were genuine bombers the FBI knew enough about them to have stopped them and if they were patsies the FBI knew enough about them to have set them up.

Despite all the people with backpacks on view near the finish line - including all of those from Craft International - the authorities told people that the other images were not relevant. They were only interested in those of the Tsarnaevs because they were the names on the song sheet.

Their parents said that the FBI had been watching Tamerlan Tsarnaev for up to five years and that he knew they were tracking him. So how could the bombing have been allowed to happen then if the official story is true? His parents said that the FBI had called Tamerlan after the bombings to accuse him of being involved. He had replied 'That's your problem', his father said.

The brothers do not appear to have lived strict Islamic lifestyles to say the least or to have been obsessed with religion and we should remember that virtually everything 'we know' about them and what happened between the bombings and their death and capture is only what the authorities have told us.

They said that Tamerlan died in a shoot-out with police and when his brother ran over him in a car trying to get away, but that is not what a witness close to the scene said happened. The witness, referred to as Linda, was interviewed on WEEI 93.7 FM in Boston on April 19th.

She said that she was at her boyfriend's house in Dexter Street where Tamerlan is said to have died. Linda said she heard gunfire getting louder and closer to the house:

'I just started screaming because I knew something was wrong. We rushed to the front of the house ... where we saw the first suspect get hit by a police SUV and after he was hit [he was] shot multiple times.'

She said that minutes later an ambulance arrived to take the man away and 'within moments we were surrounded by SWAT, Boston Police, Watertown Police, Cambridge Police ... It's been tough watching the neighbours being pulled out of their houses at gun point and the SWAT ... it's been a really long night ...'

Linda was asked to confirm that the police vehicle hit Tamerlan Tsarnaev first and she replied 'correct'. She added: 'I did not see him fire, I just remember seeing him get shot multiple times.'

Tamerlan Tsarnaev was dead and could not speak for himself and we were left with the police to tell us what had happened as the search was launched for younger brother Dzhokar. The only narrative about this came once again from the police and the idea is to get your story out first and make that the only one that most people ever hear. This is what happened with 9/11 and happens every time.

We were told that Dzhokhar had been captured in another shoot-out after being found hiding in a boat but it emerged that it could not have been a 'shoot-out' because officials later said that he didn't have a gun and a police officer injured in the capture was the victim of 'friendly-fire'.

The police said that Dzhokhar would possibly be unable to talk after 'shooting himself in the throat'. If, as they said, he was trying to commit suicide why would he shoot himself in the throat? If he wasn't, why would he shoot himself in the throat? If he didn't have a gun, how did he shoot himself at all?

One minute he was in hospital with a throat wound that would likely mean he couldn't speak and the next the police are telling us how he was confirming their official story. It was laughable.

Once a suspect is taken into custody this is usually the end of any alternative version of events anyway because of the sophistication of modern-day mind control which can convince even the most innocent that they are guilty.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev emerges from the boat.

There are so many questions that still have not been answered and they won't be by the authorities because once their story is unleashed nothing is allowed to question or contradict it; but it is obvious from the information that I have laid out here that a very different version of events is being hidden.

There was another great bonus for the global conspiracy in that the search for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev allowed them to get Americans used to the kind of martial law that is planned for the whole country and to test public reaction to it.

The crowds that chanted 'USA, USA' in response to a police operation that had turned Boston into a city under military control was not encouraging to say the least and so many continue to live in child-like self-delusion in the face of what is happening.

But there is much to make us optimistic, too. These staged events are becoming so much more difficult to sell compared with before as people in ever-increasing numbers get the message about Problem-Reaction-Solution, how it works and to what end.

Boston was their hardest sell yet because of this emerging awareness and it can only get even harder from hereon as news of the global agenda expands further into public consciousness.

Tsarnaev wife's Skull and Bones and CIA family connections