MAGNITUDE OF THE MESS WE ARE IN

MAGNITUDE OF THE MESS WE ARE IN

By George P. Shultz, Michael J. Boskin, John F. Cogan, Allan H. Meltzer and John B. Taylor

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303561504577497442109193610.html#printMode

WALL STREET JOURNAL

September 16, 2012

Sometimes a few facts tell important stories. The American economy now is full of facts that tell stories that you really don't want, but need, to hear.

Where are we now?

Did you know that annual spending by the federal government now exceeds the 2007 level by about $1 trillion? With a slow economy, revenues are little changed. The result is an unprecedented string of federal budget deficits, $1.4 trillion in 2009, $1.3 trillion in 2010, $1.3 trillion in 2011, and another $1.2 trillion on the way this year. The four-year increase in borrowing amounts to $55,000 per U.S. household.

The amount of debt is one thing. The burden of interest payments is another. The Treasury now has a preponderance of its debt issued in very short-term durations, to take advantage of low short-term interest rates. It must frequently refinance this debt which, when added to the current deficit, means Treasury must raise $4 trillion this year alone. So the debt burden will explode when interest rates go up.

The government has to get the money to finance its spending by taxing or borrowing. While it might be tempting to conclude that we can just tax upper-income people, did you know that the U.S. income tax system is already very progressive? The top 1% pay 37% of all income taxes and 50% pay none.

Did you know that, during the last fiscal year, around three-quarters of the deficit was financed by the Federal Reserve? Foreign governments accounted for most of the rest, as American citizens' and institutions' purchases and sales netted to about zero. The Fed now owns one in six dollars of the national debt, the largest percentage of GDP in history, larger than even at the end of World War II.

The Fed has effectively replaced the entire interbank money market and large segments of other markets with itself. It determines the interest rate by declaring what it will pay on reserve balances at the Fed without regard for the supply and demand of money. By replacing large decentralized markets with centralized control by a few government officials, the Fed is distorting incentives and interfering with price discovery with unintended economic consequences.

Did you know that the Federal Reserve is now giving money to banks, effectively circumventing the appropriations process? To pay for quantitative easing—the purchase of government debt, mortgage-backed securities, etc.—the Fed credits banks with electronic deposits that are reserve balances at the Federal Reserve. These reserve balances have exploded to $1.5 trillion from $8 billion in September 2008.

The Fed now pays 0.25% interest on reserves it holds. So the Fed is paying the banks almost $4 billion a year. If interest rates rise to 2%, and the Federal Reserve raises the rate it pays on reserves correspondingly, the payment rises to $30 billion a year. Would Congress appropriate that kind of money to give—not lend—to banks?

The Fed's policy of keeping interest rates so low for so long means that the real rate (after accounting for inflation) is negative, thereby cutting significantly the real income of those who have saved for retirement over their lifetime.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is also being financed by the Federal Reserve rather than by appropriations, severing the checks and balances needed for good government. And the Fed's Operation Twist, buying long-term and selling short-term debt, is substituting for the Treasury's traditional debt management.

This large expansion of reserves creates two-sided risks. If it is not unwound, the reserves could pour into the economy, causing inflation. In that event, the Fed will have effectively turned the government debt and mortgage-backed securities it purchased into money that will have an explosive impact. If reserves are unwound too quickly, banks may find it hard to adjust and pull back on loans. Unwinding would be hard to manage now, but will become ever harder the more the balance sheet rises.

The issue is not merely how much we spend, but how wisely, how effectively. Did you know that the federal government had 46 separate job-training programs? Yet a 47th for green jobs was added, and the success rate was so poor that the Department of Labor inspector general said it should be shut down. We need to get much better results from current programs, serving a more carefully targeted set of people with more effective programs that increase their opportunities.

Did you know that funding for federal regulatory agencies and their employment levels are at all-time highs? In 2010, the number of Federal Register pages devoted to proposed new rules broke its previous all-time record for the second consecutive year. It's up by 25% compared to 2008. These regulations alone will impose large costs and create heightened uncertainty for business and especially small business.

This is all bad enough, but where we are headed is even worse.

President Obama's budget will raise the federal debt-to-GDP ratio to 80.4% in two years, about double its level at the end of 2008, and a larger percentage point increase than Greece from the end of 2008 to the beginning of this year.

Under the president's budget, for example, the debt expands rapidly to $18.8 trillion from $10.8 trillion in 10 years. The interest costs alone will reach $743 billion a year, more than we are currently spending on Social Security, Medicare or national defense, even under the benign assumption of no inflationary increase or adverse bond-market reaction. For every one percentage point increase in interest rates above this projection, interest costs rise by more than $100 billion, more than current spending on veterans' health and the National Institutes of Health combined.

Worse, the unfunded long-run liabilities of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid add tens of trillions of dollars to the debt, mostly due to rising real benefits per beneficiary. Before long, all the government will be able to do is finance the debt and pay pension and medical benefits. This spending will crowd out all other necessary government functions.

What does this spending and debt mean in the long run if it is not controlled? One result will be ever-higher income and payroll taxes on all taxpayers that will reach over 80% at the top and 70% for many middle-income working couples.

Did you know that the federal government used the bankruptcy of two auto companies to transfer money that belonged to debt holders such as pension funds and paid it to friendly labor unions? This greatly increased uncertainty about creditor rights under bankruptcy law.

The Fed is adding to the uncertainty of current policy. Quantitative easing as a policy tool is very hard to manage. Traders speculate whether and when the Fed will intervene next. The Fed can intervene without limit in any credit market—not only mortgage-backed securities but also securities backed by automobile loans or student loans. This raises questions about why an independent agency of government should have this power.

When businesses and households confront large-scale uncertainty, they tend to wait for more clarity to emerge before making major commitments to spend, invest and hire. Right now, they confront a mountain of regulatory uncertainty and a fiscal cliff that, if unattended, means a sharp increase in taxes and a sharp decline in spending bound to have adverse effect on the economy. Are you surprised that so much cash is waiting on the sidelines?

What's at stake?

We cannot count on problems elsewhere in the world to make Treasury securities a safe haven forever. We risk eventually losing the privilege and great benefit of lower interest rates from the dollar's role as the global reserve currency. In short, we risk passing an economic, fiscal and financial point of no return.

Suppose you were offered the job of Treasury secretary a few months from now. Would you accept? You would confront problems that are so daunting even Alexander Hamilton would have trouble preserving the full faith and credit of the United States. Our first Treasury secretary famously argued that one of a nation's greatest assets is its ability to issue debt, especially in a crisis. We needed to honor our Revolutionary War debt, he said, because the debt "foreign and domestic, was the price of liberty."

History has reconfirmed Hamilton's wisdom. As historian John Steele Gordon has written, our nation's ability to issue debt helped preserve the Union in the 1860s and defeat totalitarian governments in the 1940s. Today, government officials are issuing debt to finance pet projects and payoffs to interest groups, not some vital, let alone existential, national purpose.

The problems are close to being unmanageable now. If we stay on the current path, they will wind up being completely unmanageable, culminating in an unwelcome explosion and crisis.

The fixes are blindingly obvious. Economic theory, empirical studies and historical experience teach that the solutions are the lowest possible tax rates on the broadest base, sufficient to fund the necessary functions of government on balance over the business cycle; sound monetary policy; trade liberalization; spending control and entitlement reform; and regulatory, litigation and education reform. The need is clear. Why wait for disaster? The future is now.

The authors are senior fellows at Stanford University's Hoover Institution. They have served in various federal government policy positions in the Treasury Department, the Office of Management and Budget and the Council of Economic Advisers.

A version of this article appeared September 17, 2012, on page A19 in the U.S. edition of The Wall Street Journal, with the headline: The Magnitude of the Mess We're In.

Copyright 2012 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

This copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit

www.djreprints.com

Join the discussion 622 Comments, add yours More In Opinion » 

facebooktwittergoogle pluslinked ininShare.458EmailPrintSave ↓ More .

.Order Reprints

 Subscriber Content Read Preview

Das Phänomen Volkswagen Wut und Bangen vor Spaniens neuen Sparplänen Bankengewinne in China gehen durch die Decke  

You Might Like The Marriage Problem That Comes Every Four Years (WSJ.com: Other) Sarah Palin: Fox Canceled on Me (WSJ.com: Washington Wire) At Google HQ, California Governor Legalizes Self-Driving Cars (WSJ.com: Digits) Google’s Eric Schmidt: Apple Should Have Retained Our Maps (WSJ.com: Digits) The 10% President (WSJ.com: Other) From Around the Web Content from Sponsors What's this? Considering a New Laptop?  Why an Ultrabook Might Be the Answer  (Intel) 3 Things Women Should Stop Apologizing For (Women&Co.) ‘The Real Crash Is Coming,’ Warns Financial Experts (Moneynews) The Ugly Truth: America’s Going Broke (Profit Confidential) How to Load Your Dishwasher: Common Mistakes People Make (Dishwashers Info)

Journal Community.Add a CommentView All Comments (622) Community rules  To add a comment pleaseLog in Create an Account Your real name is required

for commenting.

 Track replies to my comment   ClearPost  

Back To   

Voltar ao    

Back To  MSN Money Homepage MSN Money Investing   Available to WSJ.com Subscribers  Subscriber Content Read Preview

U.S. Unease Over Drone Strikes Subscriber Content Read Preview

Housing Market Shows Signs of Life   Subscriber Content Read Preview

GOP Fight for Control of Senate Hits Snags  Subscriber Content Read Preview

Obama Seeks Arab Spring 'Reform'   From the HomePage Factory Riot Spotlights Breaking Point in China Workers at China's huge Foxconn factory complex said this week's rioting stemmed in part from growing tensions over strict rules, in events that raise questions about the sustainability of China's manufacturing machine.

 Subscriber Content Read Preview

Gaming Out the Fate of the Fiscal Cliff Capital: Is Congress going to drive the U.S. economy over the fiscal cliff? Is Washington so dysfunctional that Congress and the president will let taxes rise sharply and spending be cut across the board? Maybe, writes David Wessel.

 Your Body's Peak Time for Everything A growing body of research suggests that the body clock can help pinpoint the best times of day to perform specific tasks, from solving work problems to playing racquetball.

 Subscriber Content Read Preview

Bond Yields Up in Europe on Bailout Fears Investors sold Spanish and Italian government bonds on worries that the European Central Bank's plan to ease debt costs in those countries could be hampered by Spain's delay in making a formal bailout request.

  

More in Opinion Israel Must Be 'Eliminated'  Fran Tarkenton: Pro Football Keeps Fumbling  Matthew Kaminski: The Accidental Architect of a New Europe  Officially Horrible  Quid Pro Quota at Justice   

Most Popular Read Emailed Video Commented .1.Opinion: The 10% President .2.NFL Blindsided by Ref Furor .3.How Biased Is Your Announcer? .Subscriber Content Read Preview

4.Google Maps vs. iPhone 5 .5.Your Body's Peak Time for Everything .1.Cellphones Are Eating the Family Budget .2.Opinion: The 10% President .3.Your Body's Peak Time for Everything .4.Opinion: Israel Must Be 'Eliminated' .5.Why Kids Get Autism: New Genetic Clues .1.Got a Damaged iPhone? You're Not Alone.2.Billionaires Love These 5 Stocks.3.Is It a Car? Is It a Boat? Well, Yes.4.Defending Japanese Waters From China's Navy.5.Apple Users in China Find Issues With New Maps App.1. Opinion: The 10% President1310 comments .2. Obama Seeks Arab Spring 'Reform'966 comments .3. Three Reasons the 2012 Race Could Still Change671 comments .4. Opinion: Israel Must Be 'Eliminated'546 comments .5. Opinion: The Bump Stops Here438 comments .Most Read Articles FeedMost Emailed FeedMost Popular Video FeedMost Commented FeedMost Popular Feeds 

Editors' Picks  Why Some CEOs Fear Twitter    Facebook's Next Fight: Suits, and More Suits    NFL Blindsided by Ref Furor   Subscriber Content Read Preview

 U.S. Unease Over Drone Strikes    Why Asian Airlines Reign Supreme    

.Video  previous   next   Opinion: Obama's Declaration of Interdependence 5:01    Opinion: Obama Breaking Away? 3:55    Opinion: Republicans and Teachers Unions 4:10   .  Question of the Day If you had venture-capital money to invest by the end of the year, which sector would you back? Social networkingData storage, managementWireless, mobile technologyHealth careBusiness or consumer servicesClean-tech energy View Results »  Most Recommended CommentsCommentsCommentersCommenters.1. “Obama is a turtle on a fence pos...;”- Ariel St. Germaine 214 Recommendations .2. “It's very easy to draw a...;”- Bart Cormier 188 Recommendations .3. “Even if what Paul Ryan says is...;”- Jonathan Murray 168 Recommendations .4. “Mr. Bennett, I agree 100% with...;”- Ronald Myles 132 Recommendations .5. “The claim that Obama saved GM is...;”- Bennett Stern 127 Recommendations . Matilda Anders 2238 Recommendations . Mary Childs 2133 Recommendations . Greg Liautaud 1505 Recommendations . Hugh Dell 1371 Recommendations . XAVIER L SIMON 1360 Recommendations . Most Active DiscussionsJournal Community.  Religion & EthicsDo we need religion to have ethics? Is it possible that a world without religion can be, on the whole, a better place to live?

   Question of the DayShould voters have to show identification?

   Question of the DayHave you had to sacrifice anything from your household budget to allow for higher cellphone/mobile data expenses?

   Question of the DayWill the controversial Seahawks/Packers call help end the NFL referee lockout?

   Question of the DayIf you had venture-capital money to invest by the end of the year, which sector would you back?

  See all Discussion Groups  More in Opinion Israel Must Be 'Eliminated'  Fran Tarkenton: Pro Football Keeps Fumbling  Matthew Kaminski: The Accidental Architect of a New Europe  Officially Horrible  Quid Pro Quota at Justice    <![CDATA[

]]>  nullEmail Newsletters and AlertsThe latest news and analysis delivered to your in-box. Check the boxes below to sign up.

WSJ.com Email Features On the Editorial Page   Best of the Web Today   SubmitThe email address null is already associated with another account. Please enter a different email address:

Enter Your Email 

Sign UpSIGN UP  New! To sign up for Keyword or Symbol Alerts click here.To view or change all of your email settings, visit the Email Setup Center..Thank you null!

You will receive in your inbox.

To view or change all of your email settings, visit the Email Setup Center.nullEmail Newsletters and AlertsThe latest news and analysis delivered to your in-box. Check the boxes below to sign up.

WSJ.com Email Features On the Editorial Page   Best of the Web Today   SubmitThe email address null is already associated with another account. Please enter a different email address:

Enter Your Email 

Sign UpSIGN UP  Manage Email Preferences.Thank you !

You will receive in your inbox.

Manage Email PreferencesEditors' Picks  Why Some CEOs Fear Twitter    Facebook's Next Fight: Suits, and More Suits    NFL Blindsided by Ref Furor   Subscriber Content Read Preview

 U.S. Unease Over Drone Strikes    Why Asian Airlines Reign Supreme     .

Journal Communityclose window  Hello  Your question to the Journal Community Your comments on articles will show your real name and not a username.Why?

Why use your real name? The Journal Community encourages thoughtful dialogue and meaningful connections between real people. We require the use of your full name to authenticate your identity. The quality of conversations can deteriorate when real identities are not provided.

Please enter your first and last nameFirst name:  Last name:     Create a Journal Community profile to avoid this message in the future. (As a member you agree to use your real name when participating in the Journal Community)

 PostCancel Privacy PolicyCommunity Rules  Notice:  Your participation access with Journal Community has been disabled due to violation of Journal Community Guidelines.

If you feel you have reached this status change in error, please contact TBD@wsj.com