China‘s Secret Plan To Topple The US As The World’s Superpower
February 12 , 2015
|
Share this article
In
1995, Michael Pillsbury, an expert on China who has worked with every
US president since Nixon and has, he writes, “arguably had more access
to China’s military and intelligence establishment than any other
Westerner,” was reading an article written by “three of China’s
preeminent military experts” about “new technologies that would
contribute to the defeat of the United States.”
It was in this article that Pillsbury first saw the term “Assassin’s Mace,” which refers to a weapon from Chinese folklore that guarantees a small combatant victory over a larger, more powerful opponent.
It was in this article that Pillsbury first saw the term “Assassin’s Mace,” which refers to a weapon from Chinese folklore that guarantees a small combatant victory over a larger, more powerful opponent.
The article described goals including “electromagnetic combat
superiority” that would allow for “naval victory,” and “tactical laser
weapons” that would “be used first in anti-missile defense systems.”
They also discussed jamming and destroying radar and various
communications systems, and the use of computer viruses.
In time, Pillsbury began seeing the term “Assassin’s Mace” with regularity in Chinese documents.
“In
the military context,” he writes, “Assassin’s Mace refers to a set of
asymmetric weapons that allow an inferior power to defeat a seemingly
superior adversary by striking at an enemy’s weakest point.”
At
first, Pillsbury writes, he considered these statements aspirational.
But as US intelligence analysts translated documents over time, he came
to see otherwise. The Assassin’s Mace, he came to believe, was part of a
cunning and much broader strategy, a 100-year-long effort to overtake
the US as the world’s superpower.
The
point of Assassin’s Mace — which, Pillsbury learned, the Chinese were
already spending billions of dollars to develop — was to “make a
generational leap in military capabilities that can trump the
conventional forces of Western powers,” but to do so incrementally, so
that by the time they achieved their goal, it would be too late for the
US to respond to, much less reverse.
In
a sense, the new book “The Hundred-Year Marathon” is Pillsbury’s mea
culpa. He readily admits that, as a key influencer of US government
policy toward China for the past four decades, he had long been one of
many in the federal government pushing the US toward full cooperation
with China, including heavy financial and technological support, under
the belief that the country was headed in a more democratic, free-market
direction.
“The Hundred-Year Marathon: China’s Secret Strategy to Replace America as the Global Superpower” by Michael Pillsbury (Henry Holt)
“Looking back, it was painful that I was so gullible,” he writes.
“The Hundred-Year Marathon: China’s Secret Strategy to Replace America as the Global Superpower” by Michael Pillsbury (Henry Holt)
“Looking back, it was painful that I was so gullible,” he writes.
Pillsbury
notes that he and many other China experts were taught early on to view
China as “a helpless victim of Western imperialists” and that as such,
assistance should be provided almost unquestioningly.
Now,
he says, he has come to consider this view — which he now believes came
about as a result of intentional deception and misdirection on the part
of the Chinese — as “the most systemic, significant and dangerous
intelligence failure in American history.”
“We
believed that American aid to a fragile China whose leaders thought
like us would help China become a democratic and peaceful power without
ambitions of . . . global dominance,” he writes.
“We underestimated the influence of China’s hawks. Every one of
the assumptions behind that belief was wrong — dangerously so.”
“For
decades,” Pillsbury adds, “the US government has freely handed
over
sensitive information, technology, military know-how, intelligence
and
expert advice to the Chinese. Indeed, so much has been provided
for so long that . . . there is no full accounting. And what we haven’t
given the Chinese, they’ve stolen.”
Part
of what Pillsbury sees as America’s naiveté on the issue derived from
fundamental misunderstandings about the nature of Chinese culture.
Pillsbury now believes that since the time of Mao Zedong, China
has been engaged in an effort to establish China as the world’s premier
superpower by 2049, the 100th anniversary of the Communist Revolution.
The
reason this has been so little known, he says, is that the Chinese
consider physical battles just one minor aspect of warfare. China’s main
weapon, he says, is deception — the constant appearance of achieving
less than they really have and needing our help more than they actually
do.
Pillsbury
believes this philosophy’s origins derive from a book — the title of
which translates to “The General Mirror for the Aid of Government” —
that Mao brought with him on his long march in the 1930s. Described as
“a statecraft manual with lessons from history that have no Western
counterpart,” one section of the book “centers on stratagems of the
Warring States period in China, and includes stories and maxims dating
as far back as 4000 BC.”
Included in these are lessons on “how to use deception, how to avoid encirclement by opponents and how a rising power should induce complacency in the old hegemon until the right moment.”
Included in these are lessons on “how to use deception, how to avoid encirclement by opponents and how a rising power should induce complacency in the old hegemon until the right moment.”
Mao, it turned out, read this book many times while ruling China,
as did subsequent leaders. Chinese students even use passages from it in
their writing lessons.
Pillsbury
believes that China’s actions since just after World War II are derived
from this book and that they’re working just as intended.
“One
of the biggest mistakes made by American experts on China was not
taking this book seriously,” Pillsbury writes, noting that “it was never
translated into English,” and that the US didn’t begin grasping its
possible importance until the 1990s.
Pillsbury
believes China has strategically positioned itself as a nation in great
need of our help since the 1960s, noting that contrary to popular
belief, President Richard Nixon’s opening to China in the ’70s was
initiated by China, not the US.
During
early meetings between Mao and Nixon, Mao pushed for the two countries
to work together against the Soviet threat, with Mao urging the US to
“create an anti-Soviet axis that would include Europe, Turkey, Iran,
Pakistan, and Japan.”
“A
counterencirclement of the Soviet hegemon was a classic Warring States
approach,” Pillsbury writes. “What the Americans missed was that it was
not a permanent Chinese policy preference, but only expedient
cooperation among two Warring States.”
As
Deng Xiaoping came to greater power in China in the late 1970s, America
rejoiced, believing him a reform-minded moderate. Pillsbury, though,
says that behind the scenes, he was far more hard-line.
Believing
that China had erred in following the Soviet economic model and that
the country had “failed to extract all they could” from the Soviet
relationship, “Deng would not make the same mistake with the Americans.”
“He
saw that the real way for China to make progress in the Marathon was to
obtain knowledge and skills from the United States,” Pillsbury writes.
“In other words, China would come from behind and win the marathon by
stealthily drawing most of its energy from the complacent American
front-runner.”
In
the decades to come, Pillsbury believes, America helped build China’s
economy and military while unknowingly following the Warring States
script. (He admits that it was he, in a 1975 article in Foreign Policy,
who first “advocated military ties between the United States and China,”
and that the idea had been proposed to him by officers in the Chinese
military.)
Following
a Warring States philosophy of tricking your opponent into doing your
work for you, Deng knew that technology would be the driver for building
the Chinese economy and “believed that the only way China could pass
the United States as an economic power was through massive scientific
and technological development. An essential shortcut would be to take
what the Americans already had.”
Meeting with President Jimmy Carter in 1978, Deng arranged for
what would become 19,000 Chinese science students to study here, and
Deng and Carter reached an agreement for the US to provide China with
“the greatest outpouring of American scientific and technological
expertise in history.”
Under
President Ronald Reagan, for whom Pillsbury served as a foreign policy
adviser, the Pentagon agreed to “sell advanced air, ground, naval and
missile technology to the Chinese to transform the People’s Liberation
Army into a world-class fighting force,” later including “nuclear
cooperation and development . . . to expand China’s military and
civilian nuclear programs.” Reagan also assisted in China’s development
of industries such as “intelligent robotics, artificial intelligence,
biotechnology, lasers, supercomputers, space technology and manned
spaceflight.”
“Before
long,” Pillsbury writes, “the Chinese had made significant progress on
more than 10,000 projects, all heavily dependent on Western assistance
and all crucial to China’s Marathon strategy.” Similar assistance has
continued to this day.
All
along, Pillsbury writes, China secretly continued to view us as a
tyrant, so much so that “starting in 1990, Chinese textbooks were
rewritten to depict the United States as a hegemon that, for more than
150 years, had tried to stifle China’s rise and destroy the soul of
Chinese civilization.”
In
time, Pillsbury would come to believe that, despite a great amount of
American assistance to China over the years, the Chinese people never
saw or read anything positive about America.
Two days after 9/11, Pillsbury writes, “two [Chinese] colonels
were interviewed for a Chinese Communist Party newspaper and said of the
attacks that they could be ‘favorable to China’ and were proof that
America was vulnerable to attack through nontraditional methods.”
Looking
ahead, Pillsbury quotes a RAND Corporation study as saying that China
will have “more than $1 trillion” to spend on their military through
2030. This “paints a picture of near parity, if not outright Chinese
military superiority, by mid-century.”
The Warring States strategy advises the underdog to keep its intentions secret until sufficient power against the hegemon is both strong and irreversible. Then it should show its teeth.
The Warring States strategy advises the underdog to keep its intentions secret until sufficient power against the hegemon is both strong and irreversible. Then it should show its teeth.
Pillsbury says that China’s rapid economic rise has led to the
beginnings of this stage. He cites how in 2009, when President Barack
Obama attended a climate change summit in Copenhagen, there was “a
significant shift in the public tone of Chinese officials” that included
“uncharacteristic rudeness,” including the organization of a secret
meeting with other countries about blocking US initiatives that excluded
the president. (He and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Pillsbury
says, crashed the meeting.)
During
visits to the country over the past three years, Pillsbury says, he has
seen a stark shift in China’s attitude toward the US. Chinese scholars
he’s known for decades, he says, have long denied any sort of
“Chinese-led world order.” Now they are showing a sudden brash
willingness to admit to what Pillsbury believes is China’s true intent.
“The hard truth,” Pillsbury writes, “is that China’s leaders see America
as an enemy in a global struggle they plan on winning.”
Read more at http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/2015/February12/121.html#lrugZhFIsr91vWy6.99
No comments:
Post a Comment