The Philippines faces a very serious security challenge in two fronts and how it plays out could critically affect the balance of power in the Asia Pacific Region and beyond By Roilo Golez
The Philippines faces a very serious security challenge in two fronts
and how it plays out could critically affect the balance of power in
the Asia Pacific Region and beyond
By
Roilo Golez
Philippine National Security Adviser (2001-2004)
The Philippines faces a very serious security challenge in two fronts
and how it plays out could critically affect the balance of power in
the Asia Pacific Region and beyond.
Scarborough Shoal
Since 2012, the focus of strategic analysts has been Scarborough Shoal
in the West of the Philippines. China seized Scarborough Shoal in 2012
and there have been speculations on when China would militarize
Scarborough Shoal just like what it has done in Mischief Reef inside the
Philippine Exclusive Economic Zone, Fiery Cross Reef, Subi Reef, etc.
and much earlier, the Paracels.
Benham Rise
Then last month, March 9, 2017, Philippine Defense Secretary Delfin
Lorenzana officially announced his department had sighted a Chinese
survey ship that stayed for more than three months in Benham Rise, a 13
million hectare extended continental shelf awarded to the Philippines in
April 2012. I consider the visit of the Chinese survey ship a threat to
Philippine security.
I have long monitored the two areas and have looked at them as major
security concerns because of their location and physical features for
geosecurity and geo-strategic purposes.
Scarborough Shoal In Transition
In December 1999, when our country was focused on what the Chinese were
building in Mischief Reef, I delivered a speech in Congress and
predicted that China was aiming at seizing Scarborough Shoal. I arrived
at that conclusion after studying China’s move from Fiery Cross Reef,
and other reefs, then their building in Mischief Reef what appeared to
be temporary structure on stilts then later permanent concrete
structures.
It was our team with US Congressman Rohrabacher that first flew over
Mischief Reef in 1999 and saw for ourselves that they were building
permanent structures which we later announced in a formal press
conference in Congress.
followed that with my
privilege speech in Congress on December 7, 1999 fearlessly projecting
that China was aiming at seizing Scarborough Shoal. This were my words
that day (http://roilogolez.blogspot.com/2013/08/privilege-speech-dec-7-1999-privilege.html):
“Scarborough Shoal is part of China’s military projection at the South China Sea.
“In Scarborough Shoal, China has found a perfect forward fortress at
the east to back up its slow but nonstop political and naval march
towards the north, where there are Korea, Japan, Taiwan, among others.
China has unleashed a blob at the South China Sea, floating eastward,
growing slowly, menacingly, nearly unopposed, devouring every speck,
every shoal and reef along the way.
Chinese military contingents are already positioned in various reefs,
islets, and rocks of the South China Sea Region, particularly in the
Spratlys and the Paracels. Scarborough Shoal is just one more step
forward in their bid to secure full control of the world’s second
busiest international sea lane.
My speech did not get much attention and I was dismissed as an alarmist by some of my colleagues in Congress.
In April 2012, thirteen years after my projection, China seized Scarborough Shoal and now has full control over it.
We are all familiar with the concept of China’s plan to establish its Strategic Triangle in the South China Sea.
In January 2015, I had the honor of participating in a Strategic Study
Symposium in Tokyo where Yoji Koda, retired Vice Admiral of the Japan
Maritime Self-Defense Force (JMSDF) and former Commander in Chief of the
JMSDF fleet, led our discussion of China’s Strategic Triangle which he
presented as follows (National Bureau of Asian Research. http://www.nbr.org/publications/element.aspx?id=862)
“Fiery Cross Reef seems to be a core spot that includes full military facilities, most
notably a runway and a deep port. Subi and Mischief Reefs, which are
about 125 miles apart, are the other artificial islands with runways and
port acilities.
Japan fears that four other artificial islands with various support
facilities could function as outer guard posts for the three main
islands with airfields and air-surveillance sites that could enable a
potential Chinese air defense
identification zone in the South China Sea. These man-made islands,
when fully completed, would provide China with strong footholds in the
Spratly Islands for controlling most of the sea lines of communication
and for monitoring
foreign naval and air activities. Moreover, if China in the future ever
successfully builds an artificial island at the Scarborough Shoal,
there would be a strategic triangle connecting Woody Island, the Spratlys, and Scarborough
Shoal that would cover most of the South China Sea. The impact of this
strategic triangle would be tremendous for the United States' and
Japan's strategic planning and could be a game changer in regional power
relations.”
There have been
speculations on whether China would also build structures on Scarborough
Shoal, similar or even bigger than those in the earlier artificial
islands. Some have suggested that this should not be allowed, that this
should be a red line as far as the other powers are concerned,
especially the US.
In July 2016, testifying in the US Senate Committee on Foreign
Relations, Former Commander of the US Pacific Command Admiral Dennis
Blair stated:
“I think we should be prepared to take military action in Scarborough
Shoal if China tries to build a new artificial island). Draw the line
there.”
This month, March 17, Scarborough Shoal hit the front pages in Manila when Reuters quoted the “mayor of Sansha City as follows (http://www.reuters.com/article/us-southchinasea-china-idUSKBN16O132):
“This week, Xiao Jie, the mayor of what Beijing calls Sansha City, an
administrative base for disputed South China Sea islands and reefs it
controls, said China planned preparatory work this year to build environmental monitoring stations on a number of islands, including Scarborough Shoal.”
This news triggered a howl in Manila with some sectors urging a diplomatic protest.
I posted a statement as follows:
“Chinese station on Scarborough Shoal is a clear and present danger
to Philippine security because of the shoal's proximity to the vital
economic and military installations of the Philippines
“The pre-announced Scarborough Shoal red line will test both the US
and President Duterte. A Chinese station on Scarborough Shoal is a clear
and present danger to Philippine security because of the shoal's
proximity to the vital economic and military installations of the
Philippines like Subic, Clark, Metro Manila, Basa Air Base, Sangley
Point, Villamor Air Base and CALABARZON. I am sure President Duterte
will not trade off Scarborough Shoal for China's projects in the
Philippines.”
However, on March 22, China denied the story (Japan Times. http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/03/22/asia-pacific/manila-seeks-clarification-beijing-scarborough-shoal-plans-south-china-sea/#.WOT1JjbwxsM)
“BEIJING – China is not building an environmental monitoring station on a disputed
South China Sea shoal, the Foreign Ministry said Wednesday, apparently
denying remarks made by a local official last week.
"Ministry spokeswoman Hua Chunying said reports about the facility on
Scarborough Shoal had been checked and were found to be false.”
(http://www.malaya.com.ph/08052010/index.html)
In spite of the above denial, I believe China has plans to construct on
Scarborough Shoal and is following their usual strategy of one step
backward, two steps forward whenever some resistance is encountered.
We should not believe China’s denials.
China denied they wanted a permanent station in Mischief Reef when their
temporary structure was discovered in 1994. They assured it was for
the shelter of their fishermen and other fishermen could use it. We know
what happened. From a submerged feature, it is now a 5.5 square
kilometer artificial island; that's more than the area of Campa
Aguinaldo, Camp Crame and Sangley Naval Station combined. Mischief Reef
is now fully developed with a three kilometer long runway and it can now
accommodate 24 fighter planes. It reportedly has anti-aircraft weapons
and a CIWS missile-defence system.
China has this reported master plan for Scarborough Shoal which looks very extensive, a huge civilian-military complex.
Scarborough Shoal is
potentially a huge structure. It consists of reefs and rocks with a
perimeter of 46 km. It covers an area, including an inner lagoon, of
around 150 square km almost the size of Quezon City, the largest city in
Metro Manila.
I believe that China, using a combination of soft and hard power and
skillful diplomacy, will eventually have massive construction on
Scarborough Shoal and transform it into a huge military complex,
complete with runways and harbors and multipurpose buildings, resorts
and tourism facilities, giving it a harmless image of a civilian complex
as is their usual strategy. Note that they call their artificial
islands in the South China Sea as civilian facilities.
Just last March 30, Reuters quoted China’s Defense Ministry as follows (http://www.reuters.com/article/us-southchinasea-china-idUSKBN1711BR):
“There was "no such thing" as man-made islands in the disputed South
China Sea, China's Defence Ministry said on Thursday, and reiterated
that any building work was mainly for civilian purposes.”
If China is allowed to convert Scarborough Shoal into a military
facility, even alone, a militarized Scarborough Shoal would be a game
changer in the South China Sea. It will dominate the Philippines and
neutralize the rotational bases envisioned under the Philippines- US
Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement or EDCA (how the EDCA bases will
be developed and used to enhance regional security is still in question
given the still vague Philippines-US defense cooperation parameters in
view of the ongoing rebalancing of the Philippine Foreign Policy and the
kind of dynamics that the Philippines will have with the US under
President Trump.
I believe China will make their move here starting around three years
from now with the full operability of their aircraft carrier and the
start of operation of their second carrier and additional destroyers and
full militarization of Mischief Reef, Fiery Cross Reef and Subi Reef,
all with fighter squadrons and possible offensive missiles.
Chinese J-11 in the South China Sea. A few days ago, China's
defense minister and premier announced that their facilities in the
South China Sea are for civilian use. Now there is this fighter jet, a
J-11 on Woody Island (Paracels) with at least a 1,500 kilometer radius
and can reach Manila and parts of Luzon, Palawan and Visayas from Woody
Island. I predict that we will see the same J-11s deployed on Mischief
Reef, inside our Exclusive Economic Zone and also on Fiery Cross Reef
and Subi Reef, all three of which have a 3 kilometer long runway.
A Chinese J-11 fighter jet is pictured on the airstrip at Woody Island
in the South China Sea in this March 29, 2017 handout satellite photo.
CSIS Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative/DigitalGlobe/Handout/Reuters
A
militarized Scarborough Shoal would complete China’s Strategic Triangle
giving China full control of the South China Sea altering the balance
of power in the Asia Pacific Region and even the world.
How would the US react if China starts construction on Scarborough
Shoal? How about the Philippines? Japan? This is a big question mark
that is difficult to accurately answer. But I dare to say that the US
would react strongly upon seeing the start of any construction there and
that would be a potential serious flashpoint.
The Rise of Benham Rise
Photo from ANC
"The
area is solely claimed, as part of its continental shelf, by the
Republic of the Philippines, which was confirmed by the United Nations
Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf on April 12, 2012.
Under the UNCLOS, a coastal state’s exclusive economic zone extends 370
kilometers (200 nautical miles) from its continental shelf, while its
extended continental shelf extends for another 278 km (150 nautical
miles). The UN now recognizes the Philippines’ claim and the country’s
territory has increased to 43 million hectares from 30 million
hectares."
"...scientific surveys indicate minerals and natural gas in the area.
Solidified methane was found during mapping activities and the
"probability is extremely very high" there are massive oil deposits.
Benham Rise, which is wider than the entire Luzon, Samar, and Leyte
combined, is now officially part of the Philippines because it is the
only country within 200 nautical miles of the plateau.”
I have been following Benham Rise from the first time I heard about it
from then Philippine Environment Secretary Ramon Paje who told about
this huge “real estate” victory for the Philippines.
Mr. Paje looked at it as a source of food, minerals and energy, which are all strategic resources.
But my Mahan school of sea power training tells me that it could be
another target for China’s drive for more geographical control. Note
that China is making its presence felt all over, including even in the
remote Arctic Ocean.
Last year, March 2016, I formally recommended the establishment of the
Benham Rise Commission to study and oversee how to protect and develop
Benham Rise.
January 23 early this year, having heard from reliable sources that
China deployed ships in Benham Rise, I posted a blog warning about
China’s suspicious interest in Benham Rise (http://roilogolez.blogspot.com/2017/01/golez-beware-philippines-protect-benham.html):
BEWARE PHILIPPINES!!! PROTECT BENHAM RISE! BENHAM RISE, OURS TO PROTECT!
Roilo Golez
“Now I fear China has its lustful eyes on our East Sea.
“BENHAM RISE IN PERIL? If we allow ourselves to be lulled by China's
charm offensive, am afraid their next creeping move is towards our East
Sea, it's lustful eyes on our 13 million hectare Benham Rise off Aurora
province, awarded to us by the UN on April 12, 2012 as part of the
Philippine continental shelf and territory. Before this award, our
territory was only around 30 million hectares. Now, it is 43 million
hectares with Benham Rise.”
March 23 came the headlines quoting our Defense Minister Delfin Lorenzana (http://globalnation.inquirer.net/153204/lorenzana-chinese-survey-ship-spotted-benham-rise#ixzz4dfEHTVsx):
Lorenzana: Chinese survey ship spotted in Benham Rise
By: Frances Mangosing - Reporter / @FMangosingINQ
The above news item confirmed my fears that China was eying Benham Rise.
China responded by stating that their survey ship was only in transit,
in innocent passage. I countered as follows in social media March 10:
Golez: The Philippines should not accept China's reason that their
survey ship was just exercising the right to innocent passage inside
Benham Rise. As can be seen from the map, Benham
Rise is not a regular sea lane for ships to pass through unlike other
bodies of water. A survey ship does nothing else but survey. So what
else does a survey ship do but survey and we Filipinos would be
considered the greatest fools if we do not assume that that Chinese
survey ship carried out research or survey activities in Benham Rise.
Innocent passage means direct transit, not stops. That survey ship was
reported to have stayed for days inside Benham Rise, a violation of the
rule on innocent passage.
A Filipino columnist Jarius Bondoc, of one of our leading newspapers
quoted me as follows on the issue of what the Chinese survey ship must
have done while in Benham rise for around three months (http://www.philstar.com/opinion/2017/04/07/1688441/china-double-talks-benham-scs)
"Golez said of the Chinese activities: “I do not believe the survey
ship conducted harmless scientific research contrary to what the Chinese
officially announced. I believe it conducted what it is capable of
doing to promote China’s interest and prejudice Philippine interest.”
A former Navy captain, Golez said China had two objectives:
“(1) Oceanographic survey – to determine the characteristics of the
undersea, study the thermocline patterns; data on thermoclines are very important for identifying possible submarine hiding areas, which are of critical importance in future submarine warfare in China’s so-called First and Second Island Defense Chains;
“(2) Hydrographic seismic survey – to study what could be under the
seabed, to determine through sound reflection and refraction possible
oil and gas. Considering the vastness of Benham Rise, the likelihood of
such deposits is very strong, many times larger than at Malampaya (westside, in Palawan).”
I believe China is interested in Benham Rise because of two strategic reasons:
- Oceanographic data for use in future attack and ballistic submarine deployment.
- Data on strategic natural resources like:
- fish (China’s food supply is getting very critical) and
- energy (oil, gas, methane etc. they need alternate supplies to support their rapid industrialization and help ease their Malacca dilemma wherein around 80% of their oil supply can be interdicted or blockaded in the Malacca Strait or even the Indian Ocean)
China’s long range
plans for sure include soft targets they can seize using hard power or
using soft power and skillful diplomacy and alliance building to secure
their geopolitical objectives and strategic food and energy resources.
I submit that Benham Rise is one of them. It's a big, strategic objective.
A master of diplomacy like China would certainly aspire to make the
Philippines a part of its orbit in the same manner that it is building
alliances in the Indian Ocean, far Africa and South America using their
soft power.
Why would the Philippines and Benham Rise be of strategic interest to China?
It’s because of the geo-strategic concept of The First Island Chain and
The Second Island Chain. We are all very familiar with this but let me
define briefly for the guidance of the layman. Here’s a map to better
illustrate the First Island Chain and the Second Island Chain.
"The first island chain refers to the first chain of major archipelagos out from the East Asian continental mainland coast. Principally composed of the Kuril Islands, Japanese Archipelago, Ryukyu Islands, Taiwan, the northern Philippines, and Borneo; from the Kamchatka Peninsula to the Malay Peninsula. Some definitions of the first island chain anchor the northern end on the Russian Far East coast north of Sahkalin Island, with Sahkalin Island being the first link in the chain.[1] However, others consider the Aleutians as the farthest north-eastern first link in the chain.[2] The first island chain forms one of three island chain doctrines within the Island Chain Strategy.
"The first island chain has its purpose in Chinese military doctrine. The People's Republic of China views the first island chain as the area it must secure and disable from American bases, aircraft and
aircraft-carrier groups, if in defending itself it must tactically unleash a pre-emptive attack against an enemy. The aim of the doctrine is to seal off the Yellow Sea, South China Sea and East China Sea inside an arc running from the Aleutians in the north to Borneo in the south.[ According to reports by American think tanks CSBA and RAND, by 2020, China will be well on its way to having the means to achieve its first
island chain policy. (“China’s military rise: The dragon’s new teeth: A
rare look inside the world’s biggest military expansion”,
The Economist, dated 7 April 2012.)
"Second Island Chain
"The Second Island Chain can refer to two different interpretations,
but the version most commonly used refers to the island chain which is
formed by the Ogasawara Islands and Volcano Islands of Japan, in addition to Mariana Islands which is United States territory.
"As it is located within the middle portion of the Pacific Ocean, it
acts as a second strategic defense line for the United States." (Wikipedia)
The
objective of the US is to contain China within the First Island Chain.
The objective of China is to break out of the First island Chain and
project its power up to the Second Island Chain.
In
the 90s before their spectacular economic rise, breaking out of the
First Island Chain was an unthinkable proposition for China because of
the overwhelming might of the US forces and their allies. We all
remember the Taiwan Strait Crisis of 1996 when the US deployed two
carrier battle groups backed by an amphibious assault ship. One carrier
and the amphibious assault ship sailed through the Taiwan Strait while
the other carrier was on stand by in the vicinity and China backed off.
Now, it will be different. US forces cannot anymore sail through the
Strait of Taiwan in a provocative manner without facing grave risks and
must project their power from a safer distance to prevent a Chinese
breakthrough beyond the First Island Chain.
In the above map, the Philippines is East of the First Island China and
the length of Philippine archipelago covers the southern segment of the
First Island Chain. The Philippines is a barrier because of its alliance
with the US. The Philippines can be a gateway if that alliance is
reversed depending on geopolitical developments in the future as
dictated by a mix of hard power, soft power and diplomacy that would be
brought to bear by the contending powers. Realignments will not happen
this year. Not next year, but it’s hard to tell five years or ten years
from now when the geopolitical and geo-strategic forces will continue to
bear on the Philippines.
It is difficult to realign the Philippines from its existing alliance,
but Benham Rise can provide a short cut where China can position itself
outside the First Island Chain with or without the acquiescence of the
Philippines just like what happened in Mischief Reef and Scarborough
Shoal.
On
September 27 last year, Mr. Perry Diaz, a respected syndicated Filipino
columnist took note of Benham Rise and issued a warning just like I
warned several months earlier in March 2016 about the need to protect
and develop Benham Rise through the creation of the Benham Rise
Commission. In his column PERRYSCOPE, Global Balita, Mr. Diaz stated:
“With China’s goal of controlling the vast Western Pacific, which
includes the East China Sea (ECS), South China Sea (SCS), and the
Philippine Sea, the entire Western Pacific would be transformed into
“Lake Beijing.” The Philippines would
be right in the middle of the lake, isolated from the rest of the
world. “Lake Beijing” would also encompass the mineral-rich Benham Rise
as well.
And the above self
evident map came out in his column. Mr. Perry’s worry is that China
would gain control of Benham Rise and its vast natural resources should
China succeed in breaking out of the First Island Chain towards the
Second Island Chain.
I would like to add, invoking oft quoted sea power expert Admiral
Mahan’s doctrine on control of the sea lanes or SLOC or sea lines of
communication, that China now is looking at Benham Rise not just as a
source of strategic resources but most importantly as a way of
controlling the SLOCS of the Western Pacific through the use of
submarines or even through its proven strategy of constructing
artificial structures in the middle of the ocean.
Benham Rise has areas which are suitable for submarine operations and I
would assume that China has gathered enough oceanographic data for this.
Benham Rise has areas shallow enough for artificial structures that can
serve as naval bases or even for runways and I would assume that China
has mapped the seabed in the shallow parts for this purpose.
Should China succeed
in seizing some space in Benham Rise for submarine operations, it would
be a big threat to the US-Japan alliance. But I believe that even at
this point the other powers - US and Japan - is also looking at this
threat even if it is only in the conceptual stage, and take measures to
prevent China from seizing an inroad in Benham Rise. I expect that
Benham Rise will be a setting for serious super power competition.
Indeed, the Philippines faces a serious security challenge in two
fronts, and what happens in the coming years or decades will impact on
the balance of power in the Asia Pacific and beyond.
No comments:
Post a Comment