Can Americans Overthrow The Evil That Rules Them? — Paul Craig Roberts
Can Americans Overthrow The Evil That Rules Them?
Paul Craig Roberts
Paul
Wolfowitz and the lies that he told in the high government positions
that he held are responsible for a massive number of deaths and massive
destruction in seven countries. Wolfowitz has announced his vote for
Hillary Clinton. Does this make you feel reassured?
The real surprise would have been Wolfowitz’s announcement in favor of Donald Trump. So why was what was expected news?
Trump
has said that he doesn’t see any future in the conflict Washington has
initiated with Russia, and Trump questions the point of NATO’s
continuing existence. These peaceful attitudes make Trump into a
“national security risk” according to Wolfowitz. What Wolfowitz means is
that a peace candidate is a threat to Wolfowitz’s doctrine of US world
hegemony. In the crazed mind of Wolfowitz and the neoconservatives,
America is not safe unless it rules the world.
Hillary
is a warmonger, perhaps the ultimate and last one if she becomes
president, as the combination of her hubris and incompetence is likely
to result in World War 3. On July 3, 2015, Hillary declared: “I want the
Iranians to know that if I’m president, we will attack Iran. . . . we
would be able to totally obliterate them.” http://www. globalresearch.ca/hillary- clinton-if-im-president-we- will-attack-iran/5460484? print=1 The
crazed Hillary went on from this to declare the President of Russia to
be “the new Hitler.” Little doubt she thinks she can obliterate Russia
also.
Hillary
is the one who brought zionist neocon Victoria Nuland into the State
Department to oversee the US coup in Ukraine in order to create more
propaganda against Russia and force Washington’s European vassals to
impose sanctions and place military bases on Russia’s borders, thus
provoking a nuclear power and raising dangerous tensions.
This
fits in perfectly with Wolfowitz’s intention. As Wolfowitz is Hillary’s
likely Secretary of Defense, the two together mean World War 3.
When
the Soviet Union collapsed, Wolfowitz, then a high Pentagon official,
penned the Wolfowitz doctrine. The doctrine states that the principal
goal of US foreign policy is to prevent the rise of other countries that
could serve as constraints on US unilateralism. This means Russia and
China, The combination of Hillary with Wolfowitz should scare everyone
in the entire world. The prospect of nuclear weapons being in such
crazed hands as those of Hillary and Wolfowitz is the most alarming
though imaginable.
The
question is whether Hillary can be elected in the face of her
violations of national security rules, for which she received a pass
from corrupt Obama, and her heavily documented self-dealings that have
produced a Clinton private fortune of $120 million and $1,600 million in
their foundation. It is completely clear that the Clintons use public
office for their private aggrandizement. Is this what Americans want?
Two people who become even more rich as the world is led into nuclear
war?
But
with electronic voting machines, the question will not be decided by
what Amerians want, but by how the electronic machines are programmed to
report the vote. The US has already had elections in which the exit
polls, always a reliable indicator of the winner prior to the appearance
of electronic voting machines, indicated a different winner than the
electronic voting machines produced. The secrecy of how the voting
machines are programmed is protected by “proprietary software.” The
machines have no paper trails, precluding vote recounts.
As
both political establishments are fiercely opposed to Trump, how do you
think the machines will be programmed? Indeed, the media is so opposed
to Trump, the question is whether there will be exit polls and if there
are, will they be misreported?
Republican
operatives, not Republican voters, are all in a huff over their
allegations that Trump is costing the Republicans votes. How can this be
when Republican voters chose Trump over other candidates? Aren’t the
Republican operatives saying that they, instead of the voters, should
choose the Republican candidate?
If
so, they are just like the Democrats. Some years ago the Democrat
establishment created “super delegates” who are not chosen by voters.
Enough “super delegates” were created in order to give the Party
establishment the ability to over-ride the voters choice of presidential
candidate. That it was the Democrats—allegedly the party of the
people—who first took the choice away from the people is astonishing.
Much information indicates that Bernie Sanders actually won the
Democratic presidential nomination but was denied it by vote fraud and
“super delegates.”
This is politics in America—totally corrupt. Chris Hedges might be right: nothing can change without revolution.
The
demonization of Trump by the presstitutes is proof that Trump, despite
his wealth, is regarded by the Oligarchs who comprise the One Percent as
a threat to their agendas. The Oligarchs, not Trump, own or control the
media. So the presstitute demonization of Trump is complete proof that
he is the candidate to elect. The oligarchs who oppress us hate Trump,
so the oppressed American people should support Trump.
The
presstitute demonization of Trump did not work in the Republican
primaries. Is it working in the presidential election? We don’t know,
because the polls are reported by the presstitutes, not by Trump.
If
the demonization does not work, and the election has to be stolen from
Trump by the electronic machines, the consequence will be to radicalize
Americans, something long overdue. Perhaps the expectation of this
development is the reason all federal agencies, even the post office and
Social Security, have acquired arms and ammunition, and Cheney’s firm
Halliburton was paid $385,000,000 to build detention centers in the US.
Those
who control us are not going to give up their control without a world
war. In the United States evil has seized power from the people, and
evil will not give it back.
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate
editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week,
Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many
university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide
following. Roberts' latest books are The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West, How America Was Lost, and The Neoconservative Threat to World Order.
No comments:
Post a Comment