|
This article appears in the February 7, 2014 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.
LAROUCHE SEES DANGER BY MARCH
Thermonuclear War Countdown
Demands Impeachment Now!
Special to EIR
[PDF version of this article]
Feb.
2—With the danger of thermonuclear warfare breaking out between now and
the month of March, Lyndon LaRouche said in his Jan. 31 webcast, the
crucial action which is most likely to derail that British imperial
objective is to remove British agent Barack Obama from office by
impeachment. This is the strategic reality which trumps all other
so-called issues.
After
presenting LaRouche's argument, we append the already obvious grounds
on which this President merits impeachment immediately.
"So, when you're talking about this kind of business, you've got to get down to, especially now,
when we're at a point when the whole United States is in jeopardy;
we're at a point where we're on the verge, within a period, which I can
fairly estimate, between now, and sometime in March: We are, on a world scale, now preparing, for a global thermonuclear war. The war is to be fought, and is set up to be fought, as a thermonuclear war, and the thermonuclear war is intended to be, and being prepared to be a thermonuclear war, between, on the one side, the trans-Atlantic region and the Eurasian region.
"And, what you're seeing right there, on the edge of Russia, you're seeing conflict, the conflict is actually a prelude to an intended early thermonuclear war. A thermonuclear war intended to be fought on one side with the help of the Saudis and so forth, a war being fought as a thermonuclear war, from the start,
between the power of the trans-Atlantic region, which is actually an
imperial British power essentially; and on the other side, Eurasia, not
just Russia, not just China, India and so forth.
"And
in the midst of this you have a squabble, the terrorist buildup, which
has been built up actually since the initial Chechen wars in the North
Caucasus. And the North Caucasus area is still the center. And the war
there is being fought by what? By Nazis! Because the Nazi regime, with
British consent, took the SS and related forces recruited from that
area, and made them permanent Nazis. The protest groups inside there
today, that protest group is actually a Nazi organization; it still has
insignia based on the time that the parents of these families were all
Nazis. So therefore, you have the British Empire, again, using Nazis
against Russia. And the United States, under this Presidency, is
complicit in the whole dirty business.
"So therefore, the question is: We're now looking at a global thermonuclear war.
The parties are, on the one side, the trans-Atlantic region—the United
States, and so forth, and Western Europe; on the other side, the Slavic
area, Russia in particular, Ukraine actually involved in this; China, a
major power; India, a major power. And therefore you have these two
regions of the planet, who are now armed, and mobilizing, and playing
the preliminary games of pre-warfare, aiming: We are now at the point that the real war has begun.
The real thermonuclear war has begun by various actions to prepare for
that war. We are in a short-time countdown, between now and probably
sometime in early March, by which time a thermonuclear war under present
conditions will happen.
"Now,
the question is how do we stop it from happening? Well, there are two
things I have to say at that point: First is, remove Obama from the
Presidency. He's a liar, he's no good, he's really an enemy agent, and
whatever the guy is: He's may be just a bomb. But we know what he
is—he's useless. Pulling Obama out of the Presidency by impeachment—and
all the preconditions for impeachment, summary impeachment, exist. If he
were removed, my guess is that by releasing the British control
represented by Obama from the United States government, you would
actually create a situation in which other reactions would occur, and
the United States would refuse to go into a thermonuclear war. As long
as Obama is able to continue his role as leadership in the United
States, we are headed for a thermonuclear war of mutual destruction.
"So, therefore, anyone who's trying to keep Obama in the Presidency—he's not really the controller, but the British Empire is.
But in order to tame the American people into a state of stupidity,
they have to believe that this monkey—and he is a monkey, essentially,
as far as politics are concerned—as long as they believe that he is the
President, that he can give the authorities of the President, you're in
danger of an actual thermonuclear war. If he is impeached, as he should
be—as a matter of fact, this speech we just heard this week would be an
excellent reason for impeaching him, one of the best: He nakedly has
shown how worthless he is in office. Throw him out of office! Impeach
the guy. He's an animal, not a human being!
"But,
now let's look at what the other problem is, the other side of this.
Most people, citizens in the United States, and in general in Europe,
too, with some exceptions here and there, have no understanding of the
principle of warfare. What do you get? They say, 'So-and-so's gonna
fight So-and-so.' What, you mean a boxing match? A wrestling match? Is
that what you're talking about? Maybe with knives involved, maybe with
bullets involved? Maybe with a hand grenade or two! But that's not strategy! That's insanity!
"So,
therefore, as long as people think that warfare, and going to war
against an adversary, is playing those kinds of tactical games, like
street war, on the extended basis—they have no comprehension whatsoever
of what strategy is! And most people, except top military and a few
other people in the world, have a very, almost incompetent—they're not
MacArthurs! Douglas MacArthur was a real thinker. And we had
other people who were real officers, real commanders, and they
understood strategy. But, strategy is not necessarily warfare. Warfare
will break out to become a subject of strategy.
"The
way we organize the human species on the planet is as a whole; or it
used to be. There are certain parts of the planet which were relatively
isolated regions—transportation and other things of that sort. You would
have the most serious war where there were large migrations of mounted
horsemen. And that way you could extend the area which would become
actually a strategic area. But in larger part, the communications system
was such that you had very poor strategic relations with different
territories of the planet. For example, you take the case of Europe and
Asia, Eurasia as such, and compare that to what became the Americas.
There was almost no strategically significant relationship across the
Atlantic Ocean, and certain parts of the Pacific Ocean, the same.
"What
happened with modern society and the mobility of populations—now the
world as a whole becomes a cockpit of potential warfare. And under these
circumstances, the question of strategy becomes a military strategy. At
the same time, strategy becomes an economic strategy, not just a
military one. It becomes an economic strategy and a cultural one: How
nations trade, how they agree, how they communicate, how their economies
are connected, how they reverberate in connections from one to the
other. Any territory on the surface of planet Earth, which has that kind
of integrity, is global, is strategic. If you get an area of the world
which does not have connections outside that limited area, that's also
strategy, but it's not global strategy; it's strategy still. And,
strategy is not the intention for warfare. Strategy may lead to warfare, within the context of warfare.
"But
therefore, we have to look at the process as a strategic question. The
point is, if the President of the United States were to be removed from
office now, it would be the probable case that by removing this
fellow from being an instrument of the powers of the President, you
would suddenly get an uncorking on the threat of thermonuclear war.
Because people in general do not want to be assassinated in a global
frying expedition of thermonuclear warfare.
"And, the fact is that the people out there, our people, do not understand this. Therefore, they are stupid enough, or stupefied
enough, that as long as they believe they have to learn to work with
our President, we are headed for thermonuclear war. So if someone says,
'Strategy is how we're going to win the war'—strategy, if you understand
it, and have any brains at all, strategy is to not have the
war. Strategy is to change the relations among nations throughout the
planet, and throughout regions of the planet, in such a way that you
have an economic policy rather than a genocide policy. And the point is,
when you confront people, you confront them with the reality of what
strategy really means, which the poor fellows never really did
understand. Well, once they get the idea what strategy really is, they will not allow war to occur.
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment