http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2011/12/26/world-war-iii-first-asymmetric-war-long-pentagon-think-tanks.html
World War III Has Begun – It`s the First Asymmetric War Long Awaited by Pentagon Think Tanks
Wayne MADSEN | 26.12.2011 | 00:00 |
The Pentagon has already declared
World War III and President Barack Obama and the Congress never even
carried out their constitutional duties to approve the use of American
military power for war.
One might reasonably conclude that the United States has outsourced
war. Presently, World War III is being conducted on two continents –
Asia and Africa – with two others – Europe and South America – looming
on the horizon. Today, wars are crafted by the upper one percent of
wealthy elitists who, using non-governmental organizations, television
networks, non — profit “think tanks,” and public relations firms, can
declare war on nations without a whimper from elected public officials.
Symmetric warfare is no longer an option for the global elites. World
Wars I and II severely affected the investments of many of the global
elite families as a result of the destruction of cities, factories,
railways, seaports, and other infrastructures. The Korean, Vietnam, the
Arab-Israeli, and Iraq wars were messy affairs that also adversely
affected markets and destroyed valuable infrastructures. The Cold War
never developed into a hot nuclear war because of the doctrine of
Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), which ensured that a nuclear first
strike by either the West or the East would result in total annihilation
of both sides, along with the rest of the world. Even a western
military attack on China would have had disastrous results for the
attackers, especially since China could retaliate with a nuclear
counter-attack and wipe out the U.S. Seventh Fleet and its East Asian
naval bases, including Okinawa and Guam. A new type of warfare was
required by the elites: asymmetric warfare – the use of unconventional
warfare tactics, including information warfare, by proxies, non-state
actors, agents provocateur, and fifth columns.
Largely financed by hedge fund mega-tycoon George Soros and his Central
Intelligence Agency interlocutors, our present asymmetric World War III
was field tested just like any new product. The “themed” revolutions
were market-tested first in Serbia, and then in Ukraine, Georgia, and
Kyrgyzstan, to oust problematic governments that did not want to get on
board with the dictates of the unelected and unaccountable real
controllers of the financial and political destiny of the world.
Pro-western and pro-European Union governments, comprised of a number
of individuals who were funded by Soros and other non-state operations
established by the global elites, for example, the Council on Foreign
Relations, the Bilderberg Group, the Trilateral Commission, Freedom
House, U.S. Institute of Peace, and others funded and supported by the
Houses of Rothschild, Rockefeller, Mellon, and others saw to it that new
governments took root in Belgrade, Kiev, Tbilisi, and Bishkek. These
new governments were not elected but took power as a result of themed
street rebellions, a new manifestation of unconventional warfare.
No longer did armies, navies, and air forces have to face each other
across battlefields and battle zones and theaters of warfare. One merely
had to embed fifth columnists and provocateurs inside a targeted
nation's capital city, media, political party apparatus, and "civil
society" infrastructure to bring about the defeat of the government
outside the normal political process and replace it with a new
government beholden to the desires of the central banks and global
oligarchs.
The beginnings of the asymmetric world war began in Belgrade, Serbia
when Otpor – a Serbian resistance movement dedicated to overthrowing the
Slobodon Milosevic regime – launched the first “themed revolution.”
Otpor’s symbol was a clenched fist, an emblem that would reappear in the
future in other capital cities from Kiev to Cairo. Otpor received
massive funding from a network of western contrivances, including George
Soros’s Open Society Institute, the neo-conservative-infiltrated U.S.
National Endowment for Democracy, and various European Union-funded NGOs
that were intimately linked to Soros’s “democracy engineering”
operations.
The playbook used for Otpor in Serbia and by similar organizations in
toppling the governments of Georgia in the Rose Revolution, Ukraine in
the Orange Revolution, and Kyrgyzstan in the Tulip Revolution, was
developed by University of Massachusetts professor Gene Sharp, the
founder of the Boston-based NGO, the Albert Einstein Institute, which
helped train Otpor activists in civil disobedience and popular
resistance campaigns designed to overthrow governments, those
democratically-elected and those not. Albert Einstein Institute-trained
provocateurs launched popular resistance campaigns around the world
aimed at replacing governments unwilling to acquiesce to the dictates of
Western elites. Internal opposition forces, all acolytes of Sharp, for
instance Kmara, which helped install the pro-Western and pro-Israeli
Mikheil Saakashvili in Georgia; Pora in Ukraine that propelled pro-NATO
Viktor Yushchenko into the presidency; and KelKel in Kyrgyzstan that
replaced Askar Akayev with the corrupt Kurmanbek Bakiyev.
The domino effect of the themed revolutions saw Serbs helping to
overthrow the Georgian government, then Serbs and Georgians flocking to
Kiev to oust the Ukrainian government, and Georgians and Ukrainians
being directly involved in the insurrection in Bishkek. The
neo-conservatives and Sharp had borrowed a page from the Communists and
the international proletarian movement that saw Communist cadres fight
against capitalists and fascists in foreign civil wars, for example, the
Spanish Civil War and conflicts in Africa and Southeast Asia.
Sharp was an alumnus of Harvard University’s CIA-linked Center for
International Affairs, also abbreviated “CIA,” which is not
coincidental. Harvard and the CIA of Langley, Virginia have long
maintained a close relationship. In fact, Sharp was never interested in
ensuring the will of the people to map out their own future but was
putting into practice the theory of asymmetric warfare – the vanquishing
of enemies through the use of proxy internal forces without the
requirement for invading foreign armies and the massive death and
destruction associated with such action.
Many of Sharp’s tactics have been seen in practice in many asymmetric
warfare targets. These include the creation of a perception of a
successful movement, even if there is not one. The use of
western-controlled news networks like Fox News that showed a video clip
of anti-austerity Greek rioters in Athens falsely depicted as
anti-government protesters in Moscow and Al Jazeera’s use of a video
erroneously showing a U.S.- and Saudi-backed bloody crackdown of
pro-democracy protesters by Bahrain’s security forces as the bloody
repression of protesters by Syria’s government are examples of Sharp’s
propaganda and disinformation tactics.
Cultivating foreign support is another key element of Sharp’s
asymmetric warfare tactics. The virtual control exercised by Soros over
Human Rights Watch after the multi-billionaire hedge fund kingpin
donated $100 million to the group is a case in point. The human rights
NGO was at the forefront of hyping “atrocities” committed by the Qaddafi
regime in Libya but remained largely silent on Libyan rebel atrocities
committed against Libyan and African blacks, as well as Qaddafi
loyalists. In so doing, Human Rights Watch had a powerful accomplice in
the International Criminal Court, which tended to look the other way
when CIA- and Saudi- and Qatari’ supported Libyan rebels were committing
the massacres.
Another Sharp tactic is to seek change outside the electoral system.
This tactic was evident in the 2004 Orange Revolution in Ukraine, where
election results were rejected, and in the recent Russian parliamentary
election, where Soros- and U.S. neocon-financed election monitoring
groups like Golos rejected the outcome of the election and used shills
like former Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev to call for the
nullification of the election. Interference following the Sharp and
Soros methodology can also be seen in the presidential candidacies of
Russian oligarch and New Jersey Nets basketball owner Mikhail Prokhorov
and the backing by western propaganda outlets like the Christian Science
Monitor (now derided as the “Christian Zionist Monitor” after its
takeover by interests who favor a neo-imperialist U.S. foreign policy)
of Moscow street protest veteran Alexei Navalny.
Sharp and Soros are on the same page in calling for the internal
opposition forces’ use of the Internet, fax, and social networks like
Facebook and Twitter to advance their agendas.
In the next phases of World War III, the asymmetric warriors of the
Pentagon and their adjunct non-state actors will continue to turn up the
heat in the Arab World, with the revolutions in Libya, Syria, Tunisia,
Yemen, and Egypt, after a somewhat shaky start that saw the advancement
of Islamist groups, being brought under more western and NATO control.
Russia’s presidential election and a turndown in the Chinese economy,
with growing village-based dissent among China’s growing middle class,
will present further opportunities for the promoters of World War III.
The sudden death of North Korea’s leader Kim Jong Il has also resulted
in a call for an expansion of social networking operations, most notably
by the CIA- and Soros-infested Washington Post, inside Asia’s hermit
kingdom.
Myanmar, China’s restive provinces of Tibet and East Turkestan,
Lebanon, Iran, Algeria, Sudan, Zimbabwe, Venezuela, Nepal, Belarus,
Ecuador, Bolivia, Pakistan, Laos, and the two Congos also present
opportunities for the World War III architects. Those who seek to extend
American and global elitist control over the entire planet will not
rest until every acre of land comes under the firm control of the
oligarchs of Wall Street, the spymasters of the CIA, and the globalist
business cartels and families.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment