Is Anybody
Listening?
U.S. Intel Chief Says Iran Isn't Building Nukes.
By Nima Shirazi
U.S. Intel Chief Says Iran Isn't Building Nukes.
By Nima Shirazi
April 19,
2013 "Information Clearing House" -"WAIA" - In testimony before the Senate
Intelligence Committee on Tuesday March 12, 2013, Director of National
Intelligence James Clapper reaffirmed what the U.S.
intelligence community has been saying foryears: Iran has no nuclear weapons program, is not building a nuclear
weapon and has not even made a decision to do so.
The annual
“Worldwide
Threat Assessment,” which compiles the collective
conclusions of all American intelligence agencies, has long held that Iran
maintains defensive capabilities and has a military doctrine of deterrence and
retaliation, but is not an aggressive state actor and has no
intention of beginning a conflict, let alone
triggering a nuclear apocalypse.
While the U.S.
intelligence community assumes that Iran already has the technical capability to
produce nuclear weapons, “should a decision be made to do so,” Clapper’s report
states (as it has for years now), “We do not know if Iran will eventually decide
to build nuclear weapons.”
Were this decision
ever to be made, Iran wouldn’t even be able to secretly start building a nuclear
bomb. “[W]e assess Iran could not divert safeguarded material and produce a
weapon-worth of WGU [weapons-grade uranium] before this activity is discovered,”
Clapper told Congress.
Even Clapper,
who is no stranger to alarmism, acknowledges that “Iran prefers to avoid direct confrontation
with the United States” and would only act defensively “in response to perceived
offenses.” Iran’s “decision making is guided by a cost-benefit approach”
based on considerations of “security, prestige and influence, as well as the
international political and security environment,” Clapper said, thereby
dismissing allegations that the Islamic Republic is an irrational martyr
state. Speaking at a national security conference in
Herzliya on Thursday, Israel’s own military intelligence chief concurred with Clapper’s assessment.
While sure to continue advancing its nuclear program in the coming year, he
said, Iran had not actually decided to build a bomb.
Such findings
are wholly consistent with past assessments.
In April
2010, Defense Intelligence Agency director Ronald Burgess told the Senate
Committee on Armed Services, “Iran’s military strategy is designed to defend
against external threats, particularly from the United States and Israel” and
“to slow an invasion and force a diplomatic solution to hostilities.” The
following year, he explained that “Iran is unlikely to initiate or intentionally
provoke a conflict or launch a preemptive attack,” and reiterated this conclusion in early 2012.
With these
findings in mind – assessed and reaffirmed as they are year after year – it is alarming
indeed that journalists, pundits, establishment think tank analysts, and a wide
array of government officials continue to parrot
the claim that Iran is “the world’s most dangerous state” and “one of the
gravest threats to international security.”
Such hysteria and
fear-mongering, as always, is simply not borne out by the facts.
UPDATE:
April 18, 2013 - Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and director of the Defense Intelligence Agency Army Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee today and reiterated the same assessment regarding Iran as was delivered in March 2013.
The exact same statements - verbatim - were included in Clapper's unclassified report, including the assessment that "Iran is developing nuclear capabilities to enhance its security, prestige, and regional influence and give it the ability to develop nuclear weapons, should a decision be made to do so. We do not know if Iran will eventually decide to build nuclear weapons."
Of course, as Clapper notes, Iran's ability to potentially manufacture the components is inherent to its advanced nuclear infrastructure and is not an indication of an active nuclear weapons program, which all U.S. intelligence agencies agree Iran does not have.
As such, Clapper told the Senate Committee, "Iran has the scientific, technical, and industrial capacity to eventually produce nuclear weapons. This makes the central issue its political will to do so."
In his testimony, Clapper stated that, were the decision to weaponize its nuclear energy program to be made by Ayatollah Khamenei, Iran could theoretically reach a "breakout" point within "months, not years." His report repeats the assessment, though, that "[d]espite this progress, we assess Iran could not divert safeguarded material and produce a weapon-worth of WGU before this activity is discovered."
Again, undermining the bogus claims that Iran is an irrational and reckless actor, Clapper maintained the judgment that "Iran's nuclear decisionmaking is guided by a cost-benefit approach," balancing its own domestic interests with "the international political and security environment." Iran also has a defensive - not aggressive - military posture, one based on "its strategy to deter - and if necessary retaliate
against - forces in
the region, including US forces" were an attack on Iran to occur.
No comments:
Post a Comment