Sunday, December 20, 2009

Climategate= World Dictatorship

Feature EIR December 18, 2009
Climate Swindle:
Do You Really Want
World Dictatorship?
by Helga Zepp-LaRouche

Dec. 8—This leaflet was issued by the Schiller Institute,
of which Mrs. Zepp-LaRouche is the international
founder and the president in Germany. It was translated,
and subheads and footnotes were added by EIR.
With unprecedented audacity, a clique of climate scientists,
a majority of the media, and an array of governments
are trying to uphold the fairy tale of anthropogenic
climate change, even though the recently
published e-mails from East Anglia University have
totally confirmed the suspicion of innumerable serious
scientists that there is no evidence for global
The reason for this is obvious: Today’s monetarist
system of globalization is several orders of magnitude
more bankrupt than the communist system was in 1989.
The British Empire is especially desperate. The crisis in
Dubai and other pending state bankruptcies make clear
that a second wave of insolvencies threatens to collapse
the whole bankrupt systeme—and this time the financial
oligarchy does not assume that the taxpayers in all
countries are prepared to pay off the gambling debts of
those who have been accumulating even more of them
in grand style.
So, what is happening in Copenhagen? It is nothing
less than an effort to establish a world dictatorship, to
fund the gambling casino in a new way, and to give an
environmentalist cover to the long-desired goal of population
Monckton: ‘A Bureaucratic Coup’
Listen to what Lord Monckton had to say in Berlin
on Dec. 4 :
“The Copenhagen Treaty says that it is going to establish
a world government. This has been an ambition
. Britain’s Lord Christopher Monckton is a leading opponent of the
“climate change” hoax internationally. See interview, p. 8.
of certain bureaucrats, certain political groupings, fascists,
freemasons, marxists, for hundreds of years. All
these different groups, all at once or one after another,
wanted to achieve world domination. Previously it
was thought it might happen by force, by military
force. Now they found a way of doing it by what one
might call a bureaucratic coup d’état in the name of
saving the planet which doesn’t need to be saved.
There is no threat to the climate. They have decided
that they can persuade even the free nations of the
West to give up their democracy, give up their freedom,
and transfer all ultimate economic as well as
environmental power to an unelected world government.
“When Sir Maurice Strong first created the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change in the UN, he
created it not as a scientific body, but as a political entity.
He said at the time that he hoped that this would become
the nucleus of a world government. The whole idea of
world government, according to people like Sir Maurice
Strong, is not to trust the people. What they will
talk of is that there has been market failure, in that the
policies and freedom and successes of the free market
and of capitalism have led to the poisoning of the planet
with CO2, and therefore we need to take democracy
away, so that the institutions of democracy, which include
the stock markets and companies which flourish
best under freedom, all of those will in future be under
the thumb of a tyranny.
“It won’t seem brutal initially, but it will be extensive.
It will stifle freedom in exactly the way that we
have already begun to see with the European Union,
where there is a European parliament, but it cannot propose
legislation. If it decides something, it can be overruled
by the commissars. If it wishes to amend legislation,
only the commissars, who are unelected, can give
it permission. So Europe already has a kind of regional
model of what will become a world government with
far greater powers even than the EU over the individual
nations of the world. It will be a sad day for freedom
and democracy if that treaty proceeds at Copenhagen in
only a few days’ time.
“The Climate-gate Affair, the revelation that all the
leading scientific institutions and leading scientists
around the world have been bending, inventing, fabricating,
contriving, altering, hiding and destroying scientific
data, will, if anything, put even more pressure on
the world leaders who want a dictatorial world government,
to act in haste, and push it through before too
December 18, 2009 EIR Feature
many people find out about Climate-gate. At the
moment, the mainstream news media have indulged in
what might be almost called a conspiracy of silence, not
to admit these e-mails exist, and if they have to admit
they exist, as the BBC did one month after receiving
them (but only after other people had mentioned it first),
the BBC and most of the news media have still not said
what is in these e-mails.
“So, the world political leaders who want to create a
world government will try, and try really hard, extra
hard as a result of Climate-gate, to push it through
before it’s too late. Once people find out what you and I
know, they will not want any kind of world government,
because they would realize the climate is not at
risk; that’s always been a fabrication, and those who are
using that fabrication to close our liberties down, must
not be allowed to get away with it.
“They have certainly destroyed data that had been
validly requested under the British FOIA. That is a
criminal offense, for which I think the professor in
charge of it, and possibly one or two other officials
there, including the FOIA-official at the University of
East Anglia, will be prosecuted, and they will be heavily
fined. I can’t see how they can get out of it, given
the very clear content of their
e-mails, one of which is Professor
Jones writing to his colleagues
all over the world,
saying, ’Please, destroy your
data, because otherwise we
will have to give it to these
people.’ That is an outrage, and
he must not be allowed to get
away with it. I hope that he will
be prosecuted, convicted, and
“I think that Prof. Rahmsdorf
will be there, I imagine
Prof. Schellnhuber will be there.
I have heard Prof. Rahmsdorf’s
lecture, and I have noticed in
his slides that he never used a
peer-reviewed source. He
always used a website called realclimate.
org; and what is that
website? It is the website of this
poisonous network of dishonest
scientists to which Rahmsdorf
and Schellnhuber belong; to
which Jones belongs, Hansen and Schmidt of NASA
belong; Tom Karl, who runs the National Climatic Data
Center in the United States—Kevin Trenbert, who
wrote the landmark paper in 1997 on the Earth’s radiation
budet—all of these people are connected by these
e-mails. We have always suspected they were connected,
and of course we have never been able to prove
it, but now we can. . . .
“I described how at various stages in the previous
evolution of the climate scare, people had bent, distorted
and invented the data, used corrupt mathematical
procedures, used incorrect science, deliberately
pushed things only in one direction, a false direction
towards greater alarm than there should be. There is
nothing wrong with the climate, we are having virtually
no effect on it, but they wanted to tell another story,
for financial reasons because they all got rich on
this. . . .”
The fact that the majority of German industry adopted
environmentalist technology long ago, and obviously
intends to remain “market-leaders” in this
area, which is based on totally false scientific assumptions,
changes nothing about the blindness of their
EIRNS/James Rea
Lord Christopher Monckton interviews greenies rallying outside a conference on “climate
change” in Berlin on Dec. 4. He also intervened at the Copenhagen Conference, and
addressed a counter-conference of the Nongovernmental Panel on Climate Change, in the
same city.
Feature Singer: ‘Everybody Will Lose’
Listen to what (to offer an exact description) Fred
Singer had to say at the same conference in Berlin:
“The final word I have is for those of you who are
concerned about Germany and the economy of Germany.
I have here something which was put out by the
BDI [Federation of German Industry]. They accept every
bit of nonsense from the IPCC! How is it possible that
people who are educated, maybe even have engineering
degrees, can go along with this kind of nonsense? They
think that perhaps they will benefit from it. They will
not! Everybody will lose. Everyone here will lose, and it
is a shame that these things can happen. I read the names
of some of the people: Keitel, Löscher, and Schulz.
“First of all, it is clear that we have no climate problem,
and certainly no climate problem that can be tackled
by human efforts. The question is: Why all this excitement?
What is going on? And if you look into it
closely, you can see that it is a question of money and
power. I’m not into this business, but it is useful for
those of you who are in the press or in the media to find
out who benefits from all of this and who loses. Well, I
can tell you who loses: the population as a whole.
“Now, what is the great disappointment to us from
outside of Germany is to see what has happened here in
this country when the government changed. We had expected
and hoped for a change similar to what has happened,
let’s say, in Australia in the last week, when they
turned down cap and trade, the Emissions Trading
System, decisively. We would think the same thing will
happen in the United States. Here we find that the Black-
Yellow [Christian Democratic-Free Democratic] government
is following steps that are no different from the
Red-Green [Social Democratic-Green]; in fact, it’s
worse. A 4 0% cut by 2020? That is ridiculous! It doesn’t
make sense.”
This monstrous dumbing down of the population
must stop. There is only one reasonable theme to be
discussed in Copenhagen, namely, how the greatest
systemic crisis in the history of mankind can be overcome,
how the poverty which cries to heaven, in which
more than half of mankind lives, can be overcome.
The only practicable concept for doing that, has
been proposed by Lyndon LaRouche, with his Four-
Power alliance for a new credit system.
. An American atmospheric physicist who has held many government
and academic posts, and currently heads the private Science & Environmental
Policy Project.

No comments: