It Always Is 1918 at the CDC

It Always Is 1918 at the CDC
by William L. Anderson



[ Mr Anderson left out the most important thing when talking about the
Flu in 1918. Its severity had nothing to do with the FLU itself but
rather the population of the earth was so tired / underfed that practically
anything would have caused vast numbers to die.

Jack ]


It Always Is 1918 at the CDC
by William L. Anderson




Wherever one turns, whether it is on the broadcast news or the Internet, we
are bombarded with Swine Flu stories. Government tells us not to "panic,"
while it simultaneously engages in activities meant to spread widespread
fear.

Indeed, as Robert Higgs has written, the very basis of government rests upon
cultivating human fear:

The people who have the effrontery to rule us, who call themselves our
government, understand this basic fact of human nature (about fear). They
exploit it, and they cultivate it. Whether they compose a warfare state or a
welfare state, they depend on it to secure popular submission, compliance
with official dictates, and, on some occasions, affirmative cooperation with
the state's enterprises and adventures. Without popular fear, no government
could endure more than twenty-four hours. David Hume taught that all
government rests on public opinion, but that opinion, I maintain, is not the
bedrock of government. Public opinion itself rests on something deeper:
fear.


If one wishes to "test" Professor Higgs' proposition, one needs to look no
further than the actions of the Centers for Disease Control, which claims to
be in a constant state of readiness in order to protect us from the next
pandemic. At the CDC, it always is 1918, and an outbreak of "Spanish Flu" or
something like it is just around the corner.

A visit to the CDC's website shows that the CDC has placed the latest
outbreak of Swine Flu front-and-center. News reports monitor the every word
of the CDC "experts" who are bombarded with questions about whether or not
this is the "Big One." My sense is that the "experts," the media, and
everyone else in the Flu chain will be disappointed when this turns out to
be another overblown "crisis" that governments have foisted upon us
right-and-left.

One must remember that for many years, the CDC has been creating vast
emergency "plans" that are supposed to swing into action the minute that a
rumor is afloat that someone, somewhere, has the flu. Politicians and media
figures also want a cut of the action and make sure that they keep the issue
before us, telling us "what we need to know."

Actually, what we need to know is that government is the last thing we need
in our faces if there is a real pandemic. That is because governments played
a major role in creating the conditions that turned the "Spanish Flu"
situation of 1918 into a world-wide tragedy that led to the death of
millions. If government is to trot out its "war emergency" model as the way
to "protect" us from the flu, perhaps we need to be reminded of how well
that model works - in making sure lots of people become sick and die.

Most people don't remember 1918 as the year the flu pandemic began; they
remember it as the year that World War I ended. This was the "War to End All
Wars," or so it was called, when a more appropriate title might have been
the "War to Permanently Expand the State." More than 10 million soldiers
died on the battlefields of Europe and millions of civilians died deaths of
starvation or were killed in the crossfire.

Since war is a tool of the state, we safely and honestly can say that the
calamities of World War I were state-created. Unfortunately, people did not
just die from bullets, artillery shells, bombs, and even starvation. Across
the globe, the war resulted in vast swaths of malnourishment as crops were
diverted from civilian populations to the huge armies strung across Europe.
At the same time, once-productive croplands in Europe were reduced to
moonscapes as the armies obliterated the land.

But governments were not satisfied with the sheer amount of physical and
human destruction. Indeed, the government made things worse through lies,
and nowhere was that more apparent that the lies told by state agents in
order to "prevent panic" from the onrushing flu epidemic. As Wikipedia
points out:

The Great Influenza was the source of much fear in citizens around the
world. Further inflaming that fear was the fact that governments and health
officials were downplaying the influenza. While the panic from World War I
was dwindling, governments attempted to keep morale up by spreading lies and
dismissing the influenza. On September 11, 1918, Washington officials
reported that the Spanish Influenza had arrived in the city. The following
day, roughly thirteen million men across the country lined up to register
for the war draft, providing the influenza with an efficient way to spread.
However, the influenza had little impact upon institutions and
organizations. While medical scientists did rapidly attempt to discover a
cure or vaccine, there were virtually no changes in the government or
corporations. Additionally, the political and military events were fairly
unaffected due to the impartiality of the disease, which affected both sides
alike.

Exacerbating the crisis in this country was the crowding of American troops
onto ships following the war's end, which was guaranteed to spread the
sickness and help it spread when the soldiers reached the USA. On the home
front, huge war bond rallies in large cities brought people into very close
proximity with each other, allowing the flu to spread rapidly. On one end,
the government helped to create the conditions that spread the flu; on the
other hand, agents representing the state lied about those conditions.

By the war's end, Germany was near starvation (and many people did starve to
death during the British blockade that lasted well into 1919), and about a
half-million civilians succumbed to the sickness in that country. It is
estimated that 16 million people in India died of the pandemic.

Yet, when it raises the prospect of a repeat of this very horror,
governments engage in more lies. We forget that life expectancy in the
United States was in the mid-50s for white males and less than 50 for black
men. In countries elsewhere, and especially in Asia and Africa, life
expectancy was much shorter. Medical care at that time was primitive
compared to what we have today, even in poor countries, and it was not
uncommon in that era for people to be exposed to epidemics that pretty much
have disappeared today.

Even with those odds, the mortality rate during the 1918-1920 pandemic was
estimated at between 2.5 and 5 percent. We can be assured today that not
only would fewer people become sick, but even fewer people would die. In
other words, even at its worst, the current outbreak of Swine Flu, while
bad, is not going to turn into a pandemic no matter what CNN and the CDC try
to tell us.

We supposedly live in an age of "enlightened" government, yet governments in
1918 allegedly were "enlightened," too, and that was at the height of the
"Progressive Era." The real problem, however, was that those "enlightened"
governments had created the very conditions that served as the tinderbox to
ignite this pandemic.

If anything, governments today seek to restrict human freedom even more so
than did governments of that era, as bad as they were. President Obama, like
his predecessor, would have no problem grabbing "emergency" powers in order
to fight this supposed onslaught of disease. Emergency plans hatched in the
bowels of the CDC bureaucracy await implementation, which would release the
inner dictator that resides in the hearts of thousands of bureaucrats across
the country.

I doubt seriously that any plan by government can or will lessen the impact
of this current "epidemic," if we can call it that. However, I also have no
doubt that if emergency plans are kicked into place, it will be much easier
for the government to call for further states of emergency, with the
threshold becoming lower and lower. That we should fear much more than the
Swine Flu.


May 2, 2009
William L. Anderson, Ph.D. [send him mail], teaches economics at Frostburg
State University in Maryland, and is an adjunct scholar of the Ludwig von
Mises Institute. He also is a consultant with American Economic Services.

Copyright © 2009 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in
part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

William Anderson Archives





Back to LewRockwell.com Home Page