Global warming is a hoax, invented in 1988

Global warming is a hoax, invented in 1988
August 1, 2006 — budsimmons
Man-Made Global Warming Hoax

Excerpts reprinted with permission from Tom Gremillion
Tuesday, January 25, 2005

Global warming is a hoax, invented in 1988, that combines old myths including limits to growth, sustainability, the population growth time bomb, the depletion of resources, pollution, anti-Americanism and anti-corporate sentiment and, of all things, fear of an ice age. Those that espoused and supported the old myths have joined forced into a new group called “Environmentalists.”

Most environmentalists have no technical or scientific credentials whatsoever. What they have are major news outlets ready and willing to publicize their every utterance regardless of whether or not they are backed up by scientific proof. Atmospheric science requires highly technical knowledge and skills, not possessed by the vast majority of the so-called environmentalists, who yet feel qualified to demand that human activity subjugate itself to the whims of their new deity, Mother Nature.

Environmentalists claim that the Earth’s atmosphere is getting hotter. They claim that the polar icecaps and glaciers will melt and sea levels will rise over two hundred feet, flooding most coastal cities. They claim that many areas of the Earth will turn into deserts. They make all these claims but cannot substantiate them with real scientific evidence. Parts of the polar icecap and glaciers are melting but other areas of the polar icecaps and glaciers are thickening. The environmentalists base their “proof” of the existence of global warming on the melting areas but are strangely silent, even militant to the point of violence, if anyone mentions the areas that are thickening, and those thickening areas are many.

In the past, there have been many times when the global mean temperatures were warmer, sometimes much warmer and colder, much colder than they are now. Global mean temperatures are cyclical with the seasons but also with other normal cycles, as they have been for the entire history of the Earth. Scientific data from ice cores, tree rings and other indicators of global mean temperatures prove this. Human activity has never been the cause of these global temperature swings as the “global warming” advocates claim. If human activity was the cause, where were the SUVs, the power plants and industries in our historical past? They did not exist. If human activity was not the cause of these global temperature swings, what was?

The energy output of the Sun is far greater in one second than human activity could produce in a million years. The Earth rotates around the Sun. Its orbit is slightly elliptical. The energy reaching the Earth from the Sun varies slightly as the distance from the Sun to the Earth varies due to its elliptical orbit. The Sun activity increases and decreases with fluctuations in the solar flares emitted by the Sun. Differences in these fluctuation rates cause increases and decreases of solar energy hitting the Earth. This causes fluctuations in the global mean temperature of the Earth’s atmosphere.

In 2004, the energy from massive solar flares bombarded the Earth with solar energy. This solar energy caused heating of the Earth’s surface and atmosphere. Most of the energy of the solar flare eruptions dissipated into space. The amounts of energy ejected were massive, much greater than normal. Had the Earth received a full blast of the solar energy from one of the numerous flare eruptions in 2004, the consequences to life on Earth could have been disastrous. The higher than usual amounts of energy that struck the Earth’s atmosphere did have their effects, however, including some heating of the atmosphere.

Then there is the eruption of volcanoes, such as Mt. St. Helens, ejecting dust and ash into the Earth’s atmosphere. The amount of dust and ash in the atmosphere varies the amount of energy that can cause heating or cooling of the Earth’s atmosphere. Volcanoes also eject the kind of compounds that environmentalists call greenhouse gases. A single eruption the size of the Mt. St. Helens eruption released more of these gases, dust and ash into the atmosphere than all such emissions by human activity since the beginning of recorded human history. And there are numerous volcanic eruptions yearly.

The oceans are also a major source of greenhouse gases, as are trees. Trees and other vegetation take in carbon dioxide and give off other gases such as methane, a major greenhouse gas, and a host of other compounds, many of which are also greenhouse gases. Decaying vegetation also gives off methane gas. Studies of smog in the Los Angeles basin indicate that over 90% of the smog is generated by the vegetation in the area. To aid in perpetuating the hoax, however, environmentalists, aided by major news media outlets, censored and suppressed this study.

Studies have shown that greenhouse gases produced by human activity accounts for around 1 percent of the gases in the atmosphere. The total elimination of human generated greenhouse gases would have a negligible effect on Earth’s global mean atmospheric temperatures. The elimination of all U.S. gasoline powered vehicles would reduce worldwide “greenhouse” emissions by less than 0.2%.” What would be the effect on global mean temperatures? None. Doubling of manmade greenhouse emissions above current levels would increase the global mean temperature by one degree Centigrade, which is within the normal range of temperature swings.

It is the fluctuations of the Earth’s orbit around the sun, volcanic eruptions, the emission of gases by oceans and trees, all natural occurrences, that cause rises and declines in global mean temperatures, i.e., “global warming” and “global cooling,” not human activity.

Satellite data taken over the past 25 years indicate no surface or atmospheric warming. If anything there has been a very slight cooling, on the order of 0.01 degree Centigrade.

Recently, astronomers have noticed a thinning of the polar icecaps on Mars.

Is this “global warming, Mars style” and do Martian SUVs, power plants, and industries cause it? Hardly, but the “environmentalists” think so. Some even blame it on us here on Earth.

Global warming IS a hoax. Those claiming that “global warming” is real have an agenda other than saving the planet from human activity

Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)

* The Sun Also Sets

Posted in Uncategorized.
7 Responses to “Global warming is a hoax, invented in 1988”

1.
Wes Says:
April 14, 2007 at 12:04 pm

Thanks. Finally somebody who stands up to the environmentalists thought-crime.

I can really use this for my paper on Global Warming. I do also tell the Environmentalists story, and let the others make up their mind.
2.
David A. Bem Says:
April 15, 2007 at 12:08 am

So very true that sad thing is it is being taught in schools that this is real,our daughter is 13 and they are poisioning children minds of tommorow
3.
jessica Says:
May 16, 2007 at 8:10 am

wow intresting?
4.
Andrew Says:
September 6, 2007 at 12:26 am

The unprecedented increase in CO2 levels is scientific *fact*. And it is NOT caused by fluctuations in the Earth’s orbit or volcanic eruptions, which have existed throughout history.

There’s only one variable that has changed drastically over the last 100 years or so that could explain such dramatic increases in atmospheric CO2 levels. Guess what it is…
5.
Yves Says:
April 2, 2008 at 9:47 pm

“Recently, astronomers have noticed a thinning of the polar icecaps on Mars.

Is this “global warming, Mars style” and do Martian SUVs, power plants, and industries cause it? Hardly, but the “environmentalists” think so. Some even blame it on us here on Earth.”

As I said before:
- Pluto, Triton, Jupiter climate = GW without SUV (It’s The Sun, stupid !),
- Mars climate = AGW caused by 2 SUV, according to alarmists,
- Spirit = Contributes to 50% of Mars AGW, according to alarmists,
- Opportunity = (See Spirit),

Have a nice day

Yves
6.
Rocky Says:
May 30, 2008 at 1:59 pm

As a geologist and earth scientist for over 40 years, I have a fairly strong understanding of the history of the earth and cyclic events. In the geologic record (fossil/ice caps, etc.), corroborated by more recent historical records, tree rings, flora/fauna, a roughly 1500-year warming/cooling cycle is evident for at least 2 million years.

CO2 is generally as a byproduct of warming as seas warm and release gases, which leads to times of plenty as plants thrive and expand their ranges and provide more food for fauna, increasing biodiversity. By contrast, cooler periods are times of want, tracked in human history by wars for food, pestilence and famine.

The 0.03% CO2 content of the atmosphere is minimal and has less impact and is lower in volume than, for example, methane given off by termites (who outweigh humans by 30x). During much colder periods, such as the Ordovician, CO2 content was 10x higher than today.

Man is arrogant indeed if he feels he can influence weather, except on a very local basis, such as in urban heat islands, where much of the data have shown an increase in temperature, as cities grow and generate more heat. The atmosphere is not warming, the seas as a group are not warming, the Antarctic ice sheet has never been bigger or thicker, Greenland’s ice sheet is thickening, the 160,000 glaciers are both advancing and retreating and Polar Bear populations have grown 5-fold since the 1970’s.

Let’s have a little respect for facts and scientific method instead of using computer-generated predictions (none have been accurate), manipulated by investigators whose paychecks, perks and prominence depend upon keeping the funds flowing from misled concerned individuals and from politicians and corporations reaping 10’s of $billions from enviro products, taxes and control.

Check it out. -Rocky-
7.
Frank of Oz Says:
August 14, 2008 at 10:50 am

Global warming :-)
It would be funny, if it was not sooo sad.
Rocky, you hit the nail on the head. Pity that there are so many intellectually handicapped people on this planet. This entire episode reminds me of the building of St. Peters Basilica in Rome.

In the 15 century, Pope Julius (and others) decided to build the biggest and best Basilica befitting the “Holy Roman Catholic Church”.

This of course, was a very costly exercise. In order to raise the necessary cash, priest in all of Europe would forgive sins for money. No dastardly deed could not be “absolved” for a considerable “consideration of cash.

Then like now: Your sins are forgiven, but you must pay for “Carbon Credits”.

Come on, suckers.

Frank of Oz