THE PLAN

1. Lend each country a great deal of money to assist them with development.

We have travelled and lectured world-wide for over 30 years. In each country I pose the question "Are you in debt?" and the answer comes back strong and clear from many voices, "Yes". This is called audience participation. Please notice, they don't have to think before they answer as this condition has become part of each individual's knowledge.

However there are exceptions where the audience has shouted "No" e.g. Singapore, the Isle of Man, the Channel Islands (i.e. Jersey and Guernsey).

Until the year 1961 when New Zealand borrowed from the I.M.F., we had not only full employment, but were seeking workers from outside this country to assist us.

2. Who are the best known money lenders?

1. The Bank for International Settlements. Within this group we have the G10 and the G7. For information on these groups, please read our book 'Final Notice', pages 242-244. N.B. G7 is the main power group. They meet in the main in Basle, Switzerland.
2. The World Bank.
3. The International Monetary Fund.

Forget about the G10, they are relatively unimportant. The Group of Seven (G7) are the key players.

Should the IMF (International Monetary Fund) or the World Bank wish to lend money, they must come to the G7, 'cap in hand' for the authorisation to do so.

3. This is the most important point of all. Do you remember ever borrowing money from a bank or a finance company? Did they require security? Yes, of course. It is called collateral.

When national governments borrow from the money lenders, do they require security? Yes, of course.

Take note now. Their security lies in 'Conditionalities Policies', all signed and sealed at the time the money was borrowed by previous, sometimes forgotten, or even deceased, politicians. In the case of New Zealand, 17th April 1961.

The plan was deadly; slow, but sure. Time was on the side of the planners. Although George Bush referred to the plan as the 'New World Order', Jimmy Carter referred to it as 'Global 2000'. By the year 2000 therefore, the planners' aim is to have everything set up.

a) A One World Government
b) A One World Religion
c) A One World Law System
d) A One World Currency
e) A One World Computerised Tracking System to deal the death blow to objectors to the system.

"Far out", you say. Keep reading!

We are herewith presenting a basic premise, then we will establish this as a fact, beyond a shadow of a doubt.

Politicians - trustworthy or not?

Have you ever wondered why it is that when you elect a politician to power, he never seems to keep his pre-election promises? Why is this?

Many of them are highly honourable people yet, when they arrive at the halls of power, they are quietly taken to one side and given a list of the conditionalities policies to read.

WALKING THE TIGHTROPE

Politicians today are trapped and therefore are merely allowed to decide on such menial subjects as:

1) Should shops be allowed to stay open on Sundays?
2) Should all baby prams and carriages be fitted with seat belts?
3) Should we increase the benefit to unwed mothers? etc. etc.

It is this author's desire that every politician in the world should read this book and clear up the confusion in their minds as to why all their good intentions seem to come to nought.

A Clear Word to Politicians

They have presented you with a problem which faced me many years ago as a school-teacher of 15 years experience. They removed corporal punishment from the classroom, and left the teachers with no final line of defence against classroom saboteurs.

To sum up - you have the responsibility, but owing to the conditionalities policies, you no longer have the authority to fulfil that responsibility placed in you.

Hegel - the German philosopher speaks

Remember again. The New World Order is being set up on the basis of Hegelian philosophy or principles.

By printing the following paragraph, I am not in any way taking a swipe at politicians or leaders of any country on earth. My sympathies lie with you in your frustration to beat off continuous criticism of those who simply do not understand.

Sadly, when politicians get trapped during a television or radio interview, they angrily reply, "The reality is...." but none of them really understands the reality, unless they read books like this.

Antony Sutton in his book 'The Order', goes on to say: "What then is the function of a parliament or a congress for Hegelians? These institutions are merely to allow individuals to "feel" that their opinions have some value and to allow a government to take advantage of whatever wisdom the "peasant" may accidentally demonstrate.

As Hegel puts it, by virtue of this participation, subjective liberty and conceit, with their general opinion, individuals can show themselves palpably efficacious and enjoy the satisfaction of feeling themselves to count for something...." End quote. (Emphasis added.)

RUDE, RUDE, RUDE, EXTREMELY RUDE!

So you see then, the political, financial, and social agenda for our country is now in the hands of those who initially lent us the money.

Wherever we lecture, we tell the people -"Stop criticising your government and leaders. Pray for them as this problem which confronts them is spiritual but most of them are not aware of it.

Remember this eye - Lucifer.

THE EYE OF LUCIFER

²"I exhort therefore that, first of all, supplications, prayers and intercessions, and giving of thanks be made for all men. For kings and for all that are in authority....that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all Godliness and honesty...."

Pray for a politician - never; why should I? What positive benefits can we expect by praying for them?

Answer -	1. A quiet and peaceable life
	2. A Godly, honest life style.

There is therefore a spin-off from this exercise.

Footnotes

1 The Order; Anthony Sutton - pg 119
2 The Holy Bible; 1 Timothy 2:1-2

THE CONDITIONS

These are geared so that gradually each country on earth who gets caught in the money-lenders web then is forced to follow a certain line.

The New Zealand guinea pig experience

In the early 1980's, New Zealand had been selected by the 'planners' and the G7 were somehow involved in the plan.

5 men in the New Zealand Labour Party at the time agreed to the plan, and instead of informing the rest of the party, went ahead, and secretly implemented the policies which would later lead to the selling out of the country and enslavement of its people.

We herewith quote proofs of this action with no animosity, anger, malice, or emotion. These are the facts as recorded by the New Zealand media. You have heard of Reaganomics in the U.S.A.? Read this and marvel. (See also page 46 in our book 'Final Notice'.)

¹ "The Plan.

By piecing together statements and documents it can be shown that "Rogernomics" was a plan imposed by a small group of ministers on a party which had confused ideas as to what it was letting itself in for.... Ultimately, the L....e, P....r, C.....l, P.....e, D.....s view of the economic policy had been endorsed before the snap election. Even the Prime Minister D.....d L.....e acknowledged that the agenda of Rogernomics had been withheld from the party which had campaigned for his election...." End quote.

Why did I not write down their full names? There is no reason to bore overseas readers with any names, as these men were obviously not the architects, merely the perpetrators.

Some may feel very angry having read the above article and begin to think in terms of wild west scenes where bodies jerk on the end of ropes, but surely we can show some grace to these deluded individuals and forgive them for what they did. Anyway, hanging for treason was struck from our law books just prior to these restructuring events taking place.

Wait a moment, we aren't finished yet.

In our book 'Final Notice', on page 46, we draw attention to another media article which helped our understanding.

² "Rogernomics kept secret from the party

The Labour Party hierarchy kept "Rogernomics" secret from party members for the 1984 General Election, the Prime Minister, Mr L....e has told Australian television.

Mr L....e said Labour's economic policy had to be sold to the party and the country in various disguises the newspaper said...." End quote. (Emphasis added.)

That gives you confidence in the democratic system doesn't it? And to think that disillusioned voters, at the time, laid the blame on the Labour Party as a whole. New Zealand people will remember that ultimately we kicked them out, then brought in the National party who by this time understood that it would be political suicide not to continue 'the Plan'.

My concern is this. New Zealand, being the test case, was conned by secrets and various disguises and now, all you others in many different countries will go like sheep to the slaughter unless folk read and understand what we are writing here.

What did they do to New Zealand?

Precis of the plan:

I. Government departments targeted for restructuring

2. Corporatisation

3. Privatisation

4. Shares 49% overseas initially (i.e. locals and foreigners joint control)

5. Overseas raiders come in and buy up local shares until over 51% goes foreign

6. State-owned Enterprises and assets called 'the family silver', have gone forever

7. Investors must be found to stop the country collapsing

8. National sovereignty is an illusion and a thing of the past

9. As the future governments have little or no assets to work with, the final stage is a change to M.M.P. which involves many little groups forming coalitions as they can no longer govern the country anyway. The coalition group voted to power gives the illusion of governing and thus keeps the ignorant masses happy. True control now comes from our New World Order masters, overseas.

In the year 1996, both Israel and Italy have coalition governments, and are proving to be ungovernable. You obviously can't satisfy everybody!

As we do our final check on this manuscript, the New Zealand elections are over and 'The Economist' newspaper from Great Britain, makes the following comment - "Politics crashes on head. The ambiguous result of the New Zealand election should provide Britons with enough evidence to reject proportional representation...

...the state of New Zealand politics was a disaster all democratic societies should fear...

Mr Tony Blair, the leader of the British Labour Party, intends to hold a referendum on election reform if he wins the British election next year.

The Economist said the New Zealand experience, which could well see the country reverting "to the rule of fudge and mudge", is likely to vindicate Mr Blair's personal reservations about proportional representation..." End quote. (Emphasis added.)

Do you have government departments? Yes, we used to have them too, and if you looked them up, they could be found in the front of our telephone directories. Not now though. They've disappeared.

Citizens of other countries, take careful note.

Stage 1 - We awoke one morning in the early 1980's to find that 6 government departments had been targeted for "restructuring".

Stage 2 - The catch word was 'corporatisation'. The clever folk explained to the not so clever folk that this would increase efficiency. Any old fool knows of course that government departments worldwide are notoriously inefficient. All the Kiwis (New Zealanders) said "Oh good!"

Illustration: A gardener, an architect and a public servant had a debate as to who was the most important.

Gardener: "The first man that was created became a gardener therefore, I am the most important."

Architect: "The great architect of the Universe designed this world of order out of chaos, therefore, I am the most important."

Public Servant: "And who do you think created the chaos?"

Stage 3 - We woke a few mornings later to see a new word in the paper. It was 'privatisation'. The learned ones told the non-learned ones that this would increase efficiency, and all the Kiwis said "Oh good!"

Stage 4 - We awake and upon reading the morning paper, see a new word appear- 'shares'. At this point, we smell a rat, and quickly write letters to our leaders asking whether they are selling these shares to overseas people.

"Oh no", is the hasty reply. "We are only selling 49% overseas and thus the remaining major shareholding stays in New Zealand, and all the unsuspecting Kiwis said, "Oh good."

Stage 5 - By a further act of Parliament, or by hostile share takeovers, the overseas investors buy up 51% of the ex-government departments with their assets and those valuable commodities, often called the 'family silver', bought with the tax money paid for through my grandfather's sweat, my father's sweat, and my sweat, go overseas, never to return again. And all the Kiwis said, "Oh dear".

In future therefore, when you read the word 'privatisation', please add the word 'goodbye' and another word 'forever'.

Overseas readers may be interested to read that the Christchurch 'Mail', 20th December 1993, reported "New Zealand 40% foreign owned." Also note a 'Press' headline 10 December 1994, "Most of major firms' shares, foreign owned."

New Zealand Railways - U.S. owned
New Zealand Ferry Service - U.S. owned
Wellington Buses - Scottish owned
New Zealand Herald - Irish owned
Wellington Electricity - Canadian owned

Now should there be a neighbouring Australian laughing up his sleeve and saying "New Zealand, you only have 11% to go and you've lost your sovereignty and independence, let us turn to the Austrade figures reported from a magazine called "Fight", dated July 1994. These were the levels of foreign ownership in various areas at that time.

Processed food	95%
Motor vehicles	100%
Pharmaceuticals	100%
Confectionery and Beverages	84%
Manufacturing	57%
Building Materials	88%
Mining	97%
Electrical	98%
Banking	86%
Chemicals	98%
Insurance	82%
Hotels	75%
Oil and Gas	92%

And that is not all - read on.

Let us divide these percentage totals by the number of industries listed and it would appear that Australia is approximately 88.62% in overseas hands, at least as far as these industries are concerned.

Recap the Stages

1. Restructure Government Departments
2. Corporatisation
3. Privatisation
4. Shares - initially only 49% overseas
5. Shares - increase to over 51% overseas
6. Investors from overseas

Notice now, that without these investors, your country will collapse economically as you have been already cleverly conned into the selling up of your major assets.

Will you believe this, that in the guinea pig country of New Zealand, certain politicians introduced a bill, (and I rejoice to say that it was thrown out) to make it a criminal offence to speak against foreign ownership of land.

These world government characters never give up. Do not be surprised at a later date to see another attempt made to silence those who speak up in defence of their country and its assets.

An Australian commentator wrote a fascinating article during the year 1994, to the 'Sydney Morning Herald'.

"While both sides of Australian politics carry on about the Queen, plans are emerging for a de facto form of global government that will make the republic debate a quaint irrelevancy.

Last week, the leaders of the world's richest countries, the Group of 7 (G7), agreed to proposals which are likely to increase greatly the power of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to discipline governments "who don't do what it says".

The G7 also accepted proposals to boost the power of the World Bank to make third-world countries adopt "free market policies."

....The plan to give the IMF and the World Bank more power, has been devised by a group of bankers calling themselves the Bretton Woods Commission.

....You might'nt get to be crowned at Westminster Abbey, but if you want to exercise real sovereignty, you could do worse than join the de facto world government, now being constructed by the international bankers...." End quote.

Question - Did the social experiment called Rogernomics that was secretly sold to us in various disguises help us at all? A wealthy colleague of mine said that this was the best thing that ever happened to the country. Not being in the wealthy group, I personally dispute his findings.

A Wellington economist writing to the newspaper in 1995 agrees with both of us.

Quote - "Recent government policies have certainly favoured the rich.

....The majority of the population are still worse off than they were in the 1980's.

....The rich of course, are much better off. The tax cuts ensured that. No wonder they are triumphant about their recovery." End quote. (Emphasis added).

Overseas readers also take note that when government departments become privatised, in many cases you will find them being sold off at 'mates' rates' to insiders (those in the know) sometimes at a price less than half their value.

Protestation will avail little.

The Global Scene

Let us offer up some proof about all this from other countries around the world. Remember first of all, those conditionalities policies.

Please take note of the key rules of the New World Order planners.

Rule 1 -
	BY CONTROLLING ENERGY
	WE CAN CONTROL NATIONS.
	---------------------------------
	BY CONTROLLING FOOD
	WE CAN CONTROL INDIVIDUALS.
Rule 2 -	By excessive rates and taxes, destroy all small business.

Merge all big business until about 6 companies control the commerce of each country.

This is called 'centralisation of control'. Thus merge, merge, merge, is the name of the game.

Rule 3 -

The first area to be privatised in each country and sold overseas to agents of the New World Order planners must be telecommunications (Telecom in New Zealand, Telstra in Australia, Telekom in Malaysia etc). Sell it for a song if necessary but get rid of it. This is so that a global dossier on every individual can be set up.

Footnotes

1 The Listener N.Z.; 19th December 1987
2 The Christchurch 'Press'; 26 June 1987