Having trouble viewing this email? View it online.
Monday, September 28, 2015 |
|||
YOUR BEST SOURCE FOR THE UNBIASED MARKET COMMENTARY YOU WON'T GET FROM WALL STREET | |||
The Next Big Bubble to Burst | |||
by Martin Weiss | |||
Dear Subscriber,
Next Thursday, October 8, marks the seven-year anniversary of a date that will forever be remembered in monetary infamy.
That was the memorable day in
2008 when the Fed began to dramatically slash its already-low Fed Funds
target rate in the wake of the Lehman Brothers failure — first to
1.5% ... then to 1% two weeks later ... and finally to near-zero on
December 16 of that year.
Plus, it was also the memorable
time when the Fed launched forward with the most audacious
money-printing binge since the birth of the U.S. dollar exactly 229
years and 20 days ago.
In last week's article, under the title "The Real Reasons Yellen Didn't Raise Rates," I showed you the enormous size of that adventure.
It was 44 times larger than the Fed's emergency response to fears of a Y2K disaster back in 1999 ... It was 81 times larger than the Fed's emergency response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and ... It was far larger than anything mankind had ever witnessed on this planet before.
Now, the big question before us
is: What happens when the Fed begins to reverse this audacious
escapade, even if meekly and gingerly?
The first and best answer: We don't know. We don't know for the simple reason that there's no historic precedent — no previous 7-year period of zero interest rates and nonstop monetary binging. We do have, however, some other historical facts that can help us better understand what the future may bring: Historical fact #1. The Fed's 7-year money frenzy forced the hand of other major central banks around the world — the Bank of England, the European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan — to also open their money floodgates in tandem. Ditto for many emerging market countries and even frontier economies. Historical fact #2. The near constant gusher of liquidity into the global economy — considered by investors to be almost as reliable as America's famous "Old Faithful" geyser — gave rise to a series of speculative bubbles:
Historical fact #4. The
three other speculative bubbles — small cap stocks, junk bonds, and
other corporate debts — have not yet burst; they're still largely
intact. But past cycles tell us that these three sectors are very
sensitive (and vulnerable) to any kind of money tightening.
When the Fed raises rates, which will be the next to burst? It's hard to say with certainty. But my best guess is ...
The Junk Bond Bubble
Any corporate bond can be risky. If the company misses a payment —
or it's simply downgraded by one of the major rating agencies — the
market price for its bonds can crater almost as swiftly as the price of
a stock. And I'm talking about investment grade bonds (rated triple-B or higher). When it comes to speculative grade bonds (double-B or lower), the risk is even greater. That's why, in the common parlance of Wall Street, they're called "junk." And it's also why, in normal times, most average investors have considered them forbidden fruit.
But whatever you call them, the
fact is that, in the zero-interest rate Eden of the past seven years,
junk bonds have been virtually the only fruit that yielded any juice. So
investors flocked to them in droves, creating the greatest junk bond
bubble of all time:
Just take one look at this chart, take a walk through history, and you'll see exactly what I mean:
1999: Most of
Wall Street is going gaga over tech stocks. So junk bonds, even with
their higher yields, are considered dull and boring. By 2000, they've
attracted only about $650 billion of investor funds.
2007: This time, the big bingeing has been in real
estate and mortgages. Yes, the junk bond market had grown since the
beginning of the decade — to $960 billion. But it's still not the
primary focus of speculation.
2015: Now, junk
bonds are back – in a big way. While the real estate markets have been
less leveraged and more subdued, junk bonds have suddenly emerged as the poison of choice for yield-thirsty investors.
Try to remind them that junk really does
mean junk, and their likely response is to roll their eyes or shrug
their shoulders. "Where else can I get a halfway decent yield?" they
ask. "And who gives a damn about risk?"
Sound crazy? Perhaps. But these
are actually rational responses to a Garden-of-Eden world where the
Fed pegs official rates at zero with one hand ... and guarantees a
virtually risk-free environment with the other.
Nevertheless, junk bonds are a giant house of cards, waiting for the day when the Fed decides to throws up both hands and eject investors into the real world.
When will that begin? There are some early signs it already has begun:
What happens when the party
ends — either because the Fed is shutting off the lights or because
investors see the handwriting on the wall?
How will a junk bond bust
impact other markets — investment grade bonds, small cap stocks, and
other recent targets of high-risk capital?
It's too soon for any
definitive, quantitative answers. But if you're heavily invested in any
of these areas, I would not wait for the final word before taking
protective action.
If you own junk or "high yield"
mutual funds and ETFs, seriously consider taking advantage of any
intermediate market strength to get out.
Good luck and God bless!
Martin
The
investment strategy and opinions expressed in this article are those of
the author's and do not necessarily reflect those of any other editor
at Weiss Research or the company as a whole.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment