Putin’s Assessment of Trump at the G-20 Will Determine Our Future
By Paul Craig Roberts
July 07, 2017 "Information Clearing House"
- The backdrops to the Putin/Trump meeting are the aspirations of
Israel and the neoconservatives. It is these aspirations that drive US
foreign policy.
What
is Syria about? Why is Washington so focused on overthrowing the
elected president of Syria? What explains the sudden 21st century
appearance of “the Muslim threat”? How is Washington’s preoccupation
with “the Muslim threat” consistent with Washington’s wars against
Saddam Hussein, Gaddafi, and Assad, leaders who suppressed jihadism?
What explains the sudden appearance of “the Russian threat” which has
been hyped into dangerous Russophobia without any basis in fact?
The
Muslim threat, the Russian threat, and the lies used to destroy Iraq,
Libya, and parts of Syria are all orchestrations to serve Israeli and
neoconservative aspirations.
Saddam
Hussein was a secular leader whose job was to sit on the animosities of
the Sunni and Shia and maintain a non-violent political stability in
Iraq. He, Assad, and Gaddafi suppressed the extremism that leads to
jihadism. Saddam had nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11, and under his
rule Iraq constituted a ZERO threat to the US. He had been a faithful
vassal and attacked Iran for Washington, which had hopes of using Iraq
to overthrow the Iranian government.
Removing
secular leaders is what unleashes jihadism. Washington unleashed Muslim
terrorism by regime change that murdered secular leaders and left
countries in chaos.
Fomenting
chaos in Iraq was the beginning for spreading chaos into Syria and then
Iran. Syria and Iran support Hezbollah, the militia in southern Lebanon
that has twice driven out the Israeli Army sent in to occupy southern
Lebanon so that Israel could appropriate the water resources.
The
neoconservatives’ wars against the Middle East serve to remove the
governments that provide military and financial support to Hezbollah. By
spreading jihadism closer to the Russian Federation, these wars
coincide perfectly with the US neoconservative policy of US World
Hegemony. As expressed by Paul Wolfowitz, US Undersecretary of Defense
for Policy:
“Our
first objective is to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival, either
on the territory of the former Soviet Union or elsewhere, that poses a
threat on the order of that posed formerly by the Soviet Union. This is a
dominant consideration underlying the new regional defense strategy and
requires that we endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a
region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient
to generate global power.”
Israel
wants Syria and Iran to join Iraq and Libya in American-induced chaos
so that Israel can steal the water in southern Lebanon. If Syria and
Iran are in chaos like Iraq and Libya, Hezbollah will not have the
military and financial support to withstand the Israeli military.
The
neoconservatives have broader aims than Israel’s. The neoconservatives
want Syria and Iran in jihadist turmoil so that the neoconservatives can
send jihadism into the Russian Federation and into China. China has a
Muslim province that borders Kazakhstan. By causing internal problems
for Russia and China, the neoconservatives can reduce Russia and China’s
abilities to hinder US unilateralism.
That is what Syria is about. It is not about anything else.
The
“Muslim threat” appeared suddenly with the 9/11 attack on the WTC and
Pentagon. The attack was instantly blamed on Muslims. Although the US
government maintained that it had no idea that such an attack was in the
works, the US government knew instantly who did it. Quite clearly, it
is impossible to know instantly who did an attack about which the
government had no idea. In what has become the hallmark of every
“terrorist attack,” IDs left at the scene conveniently identified the
“terrorists.”
There
are now 3,000 architects and engineers who put their reputation on the
line by challenging the official story of the collapse of the WTC
buildings. According to all known science, the official explanation of
the destruction of the 3 highrise WTC buildings is strictly impossible.
There is endless evidence online provided not by ignorant presstitutes,
conspiracy theorists, and lying politicians, but by real experts. Just
go to the Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth website, to the
Firefighters and First responders for 9/11 Truth website, to the Pilots
for 9/11 Truth website. Research what some foreign government officials
have to say about the absurd story told by the US government. That any
percentage of the US population believes the obvious false official 9/11
story is proof of the total failure of education in America. Much of
the population is incapable of thought. People simply accept whatever
the government tells them regardless of the absurdity of the
explanation.
Where
did the alleged “Muslim threat” come from? What produced it? 9/11
happened before Washington destroyed in whole or part seven Muslim
countries, killing, maiming, orphaning, and displacing millions of
Muslims who are now overrunning Washington’s vassal states in Europe.
Such wars on innocents could produce terrorists, but 9/11 was prior to
Washington’s wars against Muslims.
Osama
bin Laden and Al-Qaeda were Washington’s allies against the Soviets in
Afghanistan. Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda most certainly did not have the
inside information and inside connections to outwit all 17 US
intelligence agencies, the National Security Council, all intelligence
agencies of Washington’s NATO vassals and Mossad, and airport security
four times in the same hour on the same morning.
Moreover,
in the last video attributed to bin Laden by independent experts, bin
Laden said he had no motive for any such attack and had nothing to do
with it. Generally speaking, real terrorists claim responsibility
whether they did it or not in order to build the movement by showing its
capability. It makes no sense that “the mastermind” allegedly
determined to overthrow the West would disavow the greatest humiliation
ever inflicted on a major power. The United States was completely
humiliated by its impotence against a handful of Muslims with nothing
but box cutters. This humiliation is a world record that will stand
forever. It is impossible that the alleged terrorist, bin Laden, would
repudiate such an accomplishment.
This fact alone proves that Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda had nothing whatsoever to do with 9/11.
Anyone
who believes the official 9/11 story, like anyone who believes Oswald
killed JFK, like anyone who still believes that Saddam Hussein had
weapons of mass destruction and Al-Qaeda connections, that Assad used
chemical weapons, who believes the Gulf of Tonkin lie, who believes that
Sirhan Sirhan killed RFK, that Russia invaded Ukraine, etc., is too far
gone to ever be rescued from The Matrix in which they live.
I
do not know if the insouciance and gullibility of peoples in the West
extends into Latin American, Africa, and Asia. Some of the people in
Venezuela, Ecuador, and Bolivia, whose governments are slated for regime
change by Washington, must be aware that they are not in control of
their own fate. But how widely spread is awareness of Washington’s lust
for world hegemony? The only signs of awareness are the initial and
limited agreements between Russia and China.
To
this day, not a single European government has made the connection
between Washington’s wars, supported by Europe, and the millions of
refugees from Washington’s wars that are overrunning Europe, intent on
collecting welfare from European peoples while raping European women. We
hear all sorts of complaints about the refugees, but never is a
connection made between the refugees and Washington’s European supported
wars.
Washington
so successfully portrayed itself during the Cold War as peace, justice,
and truth astriding the white horse that the world cannot see Satan
sitting in the saddle.
Now
that Washington’s 16 years of inhumane war against Muslim populations
have destroyed the lives of millions of peoples, why aren’t there 9/11s
every day? Instead are there only a few alleged terror attacks carried
out by individuals, which appear to many to be orchestrated false flag
events, such as individuals running over people with trucks in France
and England, shooting up a French deli and magazine office. But nothing
in the US, “the Great Satan.” Very suspicious.
The
orchestrated event of 9/11 was the neoconservative’s “New Pearl Harbor”
that provided the excuse for wars that advanced their purpose and
Israel’s. It was the neoconservatives themselves who said that they
needed a “new Pearl Harbor” in order to begin their wars in the Middle
East.
Why
don’t Americans and Europeans know this? The answer is because the US
and Europe do not have independent medias. They have presstitutes.
Washington
created “the Russian threat” when the Obama regime’s frameup of Assad
on his alleged use of chemical weapons failed. The UK PM David Cameron
pledged Great Britain’s cover for Washington’s invasion of Syria, but
the UK Parliament voted no. No more UK coverups for Washington’s war
crimes, said the Parliament. Russia stepped in and said, no need for
more war. We have an agreement with Syria. We are going to collect all
chemical weapons and turn them over to the US for destruction. The US is
probably using these chemical weapons turned over by naive Russians for
the false flag chemical attacks in Syria.
Stymied
in their war aims against Syria, the neoconservatives turned with fury
against Russia. How dare the insignificent Russians get in the way of
the exceptional, indispensable people! We will teach Russians a lesson!
Washington unleashed on the democratically elected government of Ukraine
the US-financed NGOs in the amount of $5 billion according to Assistant
Secretary of State neoconservative Victoria Nuland. https://www.youtube.co m/watch?v=U2fYcHLouXY
Not
realizing its vulnerability, Russia was focused on the Sochi Olympics
and suddenly found that Ukraine had undergone a US coup and was
committing violence against the Russian populations in Ukraine.
Previously in history Soviet leaders had assigned Russia provinces to
the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic of the USSR. These Russians
faced with violence by the neo-Nazi government installed in Kiev by
Washington demanded to be reunited with Russia from whence they had
come.
Russia
agreed to take back Crimea because of the Russian Black Sea Naval Base,
but refused the other Russian areas, Donetsk and Luhansk. Hoping
against all rationality to convince Europe that Russia was
non-aggresive, Russia refused the Russian breakaway republics and left
them to the mercy of the Kiev neo-Nazis that continue to attack them in
violation of the agreements.
The
Russian government’s tolerance for provocations and insults makes the
Russian government look like a weakling to the American
neoconservatives, who continue to demonize Russia and its president and
to press for more sanctions and more bases on Russia’s borders. Prior to
his meeting with Putin, Trump, according to the BBC, called “on Russia
to stop ‘destabilising’ Ukraine and other countries, and ‘join the
community of responsible nations.’” How is that for standing truth on
its head?
The
Russian desire for Western acceptance could end up compromising
Russia’s sovereignty. Washington is figuring out how much sovereignty
Russia will give up in exchange for being granted acceptance by the
West.
The
Russians are also endangered by their belief that Muslim terrorism is a
world threat. It is a delusion for the Russian government to think they
can reach an agreement with Washington to fight terrorism jointly. The
Russians simply cannot accept that terrorism is Washington’s weapon
directed against them.
The
only reason Muslim terrorism exists is that Washington created it.
Washington first used jihadism against the Soviet army in Afghanistan.
Then against Gaddafi in Libya. Then when Obama’s plan to invade Syria on
the trumped-up chemical weapons charge was blocked by the UK Parliament
and Russia, Obama sent ISIS to overthrow Assad. General Flynn, who was
the director of the US Defense Intelligence Agency stated this
matter-of-factly on Al Jazeera. Flynn said it was a “willful decision”
of the Obama administration to send ISIS to overthrow Assad. This is why
Russia’s hopes of a common front against ISIS never made any sense.
Jihadism is Washington’s best weapon with which to destabilize Russia. Why would Washington help Russia to defeat this weapon?
There
is so much fake news and disinformation spread in the Western media
that it even affects the Russians, perhaps even the Chinese.
Even Western analysts who reject the official Syria story still buy into the lie that Assad is a dictator.
When
Putin meets with Trump, Putin will have to assess whether Trump is a
real president or just another front man for the powerful interest
groups that run Washington’s empire.
If Putin concludes that Trump is merely a front man, then Putin has no alternative but to prepare for war.
No comments:
Post a Comment