The Coup, Then and Now – The Enemies of Humanity Try to Give Trump the JFK Treatment
15544 Views
May 31, 2017
By Anton Chaitkin
The Anglo-American oligarchy began a coup against President Donald Trump after his surprise 2016 election. They were in a panic
to block his announced aims of partnership with Russia, the end of
permanent war, the overturn of predatory Free Trade, and the return of
Glass Steagall to break Wall Street’s power. The panic turned into a frenzy
on the Russian angle, as it emerged that Trump had been working with
strategic advisors who were prepared to return the United States to its
traditional support for national sovereignty, and drop the regime-change
insanity pursued by Presidents Bush and Obama.
We
have seen this kind of coup d’etat before, against the outstanding
nationalist U.S. President of the second half of the 20th century, John
F. Kennedy.We have lived in the shadow of that coup ever since.
Perhaps
throwing some new light on those events and, most importantly, what
Kennedy himself understood about them, can help us see our way now to
sanity and survival.
In
this report, we will focus on two leading mortal opponents of JFK,
Allen Dulles and Lyman Lemnitzer, the first in the spy world, and the
other in the military. Alhough they were Americans, we will situate them
as they saw themselves, internationally: they were men of the
London-centered power structure that ran the Cold War against President
Franklin Roosevelt’s design for peace at the end of World War II, that
warred on President Kennedy, and that now pushes for world war.
1. Dulles and Lemnitzer Betray President Roosevelt
In
November, 1942, Allen Dulles set up shop in the Swiss capital, Bern, in
collaboration with the British secret intelligence service station
chief in that city, Frederick Vanden Heuvel.
Allen
Dulles was the most prominent American attorney for the Morgan,
Rockefeller and Harriman financial and political interests, interests
closely allied to the British Crown and the City of London. He was
nominally a high officer of President Roosevelt’s Office of Strategic
Services (OSS) intelligence organization. But Dulles and the President
were the deepest of enemies.
A month before Dulles arrived in Bern, the Roosevelt administration had used the Trading with the Enemy Act
to confiscate shares in a Nazi-front banking apparatus (“Union Banking
Corporation”) run from the New York offices of a core client of Allen
and his brother John Foster Dulles, Brown Brothers Harriman.[1]The
Harriman parent enterprise was the world’s largest private investment
bank, closely connected to the Bank of England. Its attorneys, the
Dulles brothers, had long acted as that bank’s intermediaries with the
Hitler regime.
In
Bern, Dulles and Vanden Heuvel began conferring with their Nazi
contacts on how German forces would be redeployed against the Soviet
Union, America’s ally against Hitler, after Britain and the United
States would conclude what they hoped would be a separate peace deal
with the Nazis.
The
British intelligence strategist Van den Heuvel and Dulles met in
February 1943 with a representative of the Nazi SS (“storm
troopers”)…The SS spokesman was a German prince from Czechoslovakia, Max
Egon Hohenlohe,[2] Dulles’s friend of 20 years.
In
reporting on those 1943 discussions in Bern, Hohenlohe said that Dulles
told him the post-war arrangements must permit “the existence of a
‘Greater Germany’ which would include Austria and a section of
Czechoslovakia. This … would be a part of ‘a cordon sanitaire against
Bolshevism and pan-Slavism’ which … would be ‘the best guarantee of
order and progress in Central and Eastern Europe.’” [3]
Meanwhile,
President Franklin D. Roosevelt conferred with British Prime Minister
Winston Churchill at Casablanca, Morocco in January 1943. Roosevelt
declared that “unconditional surrender” of the Nazis must be the firm
policy of the Allies. FDR, using the terminology of American Civil War
General Ulysses S. Grant, emphasized that German war-power must be ended
completely, as opposed to London’s idea of shifting Germany into action
against Russia. Churchill was shocked by Roosevelt’s stance; although
he made no rebuttal, he never accepted this standpoint.
Russia
had long been a target in British geopolitical wars. The British Empire
abhorred the potential rise in Eurasia of national industrial powers
that could challenge its global hegemony, which was based on free trade,
control of financial flows, and supremacy on the seas. Most greatly
feared was any alliance between Russia and the United States, two
transcontinental nations whose best thinkers came to see themselves as
natural allies—a relationship that took shape through the close Russian
study of Alexander Hamilton’s nation-building economics in the early
19th century; American participation in building Russia’s first
railroads in the 1830s; great popular support for Russia by Americans
when Russia was under attack by Britain in the 1850s Crimean War;
Russian Tsar Alexander II’s military backing of President Abraham
Lincoln and the Union against the London-sponsored Confederacy; and the
late-19th century surge of Russian industry under the guidance of
Finance Minister Count Sergei Witte, a practitioner of Hamiltonian
“American System” economics.
In
the course of its long drive in the late 19th century to disrupt the
spread of the American System in Europe, especially through pitting
Germany and Russia against each other, Britain sponsored the 1905 war by
its ally Japan, which destabilized Russia and led, in 1917, to
upheavals that London tried to control. But the British did not succeed
in controlling the Bolshevik Revolution or the subsequent policies of
Lenin and Stalin in the Soviet Union; and when Russia could not be
controlled through agents and allies within, the traditional British
practice was to seek to weaken it by war.
British
interests and their Wall Street partners had backed the rise of Hitler,
largely on the logic that Hitler would make war on Russia. Britain only
began really opposing Hitler when he turned his forces west, toward
them, in 1940.
Once
the United States joined the war against Germany, fascist Italy, and
Japan at the end of 1941, Churchill worked to prolong the conflict,
while Russians were dying by the millions fighting the Nazis, who had
invaded in June of that year. Churchill prevented, until 1944, a direct
western invasion through France to hit Germany. Churchill’s chief
factional allies in this stalling tactic were General Bernard
Montgomery, commander of the British Eighth Army, and Montgomery’s
superior officer, General Harold Alexander, Britain’s Mediterranean
commander, a high English aristocrat close to the Royal Family.
President
Roosevelt was well aware of the British and Wall Street perfidy. When
he returned home from Casablanca, Roosevelt explained the unconditional
surrender doctrine to the American people:
[U]nless
the peace that follows [this war] recognizes that the whole world is
one neighborhood and does justice to the whole human race, the germs of
another world war will remain as a constant threat to mankind….
In
an attempt to ward off the inevitable disaster that lies ahead of them,
the Axis propagandists are trying all their old tricks, in order to
divide the United Nations. They seek to create the idea that if we win
this war, Russia, and England, and China, and the United States are
going to get into a cat-and-dog fight.
This
is their final effort to turn one Nation against another, in the vain
hope that they may settle with one or two at a time—that any of us may
be so gullible and so forgetful as to be duped into making ‘deals’ at
the expense of our allies.
To
these panicky attempts—and that is the best word to use: “panicky”—to
escape the consequences of their crimes, we say—all the United Nations
say—that the only terms on which we shall deal with any Axis Government,
or any Axis factions, are the terms proclaimed at Casablanca:
“unconditional surrender.” We know, and the plain people of our enemies
will eventually know, that in our uncompromising policy we mean no harm
to the common people of the Axis Nations. But we do mean to impose
punishment and retribution in full upon their guilty, barbaric leaders.
The
Nazis must be frantic—not just panicky, but frantic if they believe
that they can devise any propaganda that would turn the British and the
American and the Chinese Governments and peoples against Russia—or
Russia against the rest of us.
The
overwhelming courage and endurance of the Russian people in
withstanding and hurling back the invaders- the genius with which their
great armies have been directed and led by Mr. Stalin and their military
commanders—all speak for themselves.[4]
London’s
stalling tactics succeeded in diverting Anglo-American military force
into North Africa and across into Italy, beginning with the invasion of
Sicily. Decades of geopolitical mischief would be set afoot from the
British position in Italy.
Relations
between the American and British allies were deeply mistrustful in July
1943, as they began moving into Sicily. On the premise that American
troops were inferior in fighting quality to the British, General
Alexander initially ordered U.S. General George Patton to keep his
forces lagging behind those of General Montgomery, for a long slog
through the island. The American liaison officer on Alexander’s staff,
Gen. Clarence Huebner, angered Gen. Alexander by maneuvering to help
Patton break out of the British grip and race past Montgomery towards
victory in Sicily.
The too-Yankee Huebner was kicked out of Alexander’s entourage.
Enter Lyman Lemnitzer
General
Lyman Lemnitzer replaced Huebner (July 25, 1943) as the U.S. liaison
with the British Mediterranean commander. Lemnitzer, an American of
ordinary birth and great ambition, looked up to the British aristocracy,
and to High Society folks, as lords of the world’s great and important
affairs. Lemnitzer had a “passion for keeping out of the limelight,”
“rarely read a book,” and “could speak no foreign languages.”[5]
But Harold Alexander became his revered mentor[6]
and under that British general’s sponsorship throughout his subsequent
career, Lemnitzer rose to the highest American military rank.
Lemnitzer
had a pathetically worshipful attitude towards the oligarchs, and what
he assumed to be the magic of their secrets. His authorized biographer
hints that this state of mind was reflected in the General’s pride in
having risen to the highest levels of Freemasonry.[7]
General
Harold Alexander was the son of the Earl of Caledon, and an
aide-de-camp to King George VI. The general had been a high officer of
the Masonic Grand Lodge of England, the governing body of British empire
freemasonry, in which princes of the Royal Family have traditionally
been Grand Masters.
Lord
Alexander was a master of the Athlumney Masonic Lodge, whose initiates
were usually also members of White’s—the legendary London gentlemen’s
club at whose elegant bar MI6 director Stewart Menzies conducted “much
of the informal business” of the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6)
during and after World War II.[8]
For
the war’s last two years, 1943-1945, Gen. Lemnitzer organized meetings
for Gen. Alexander with King George VI, Winston Churchill, Harold
MacMillan, and other British leaders, travelling back and forth from
Gen. Alexander’s headquarters in a vast palace at Caserta, Italy, to the
royal precincts of London.
Operation Sunrise
On
March 1, 1945, as Allied armies were finally rushing through Germany to
terminate the war against Hitler, President Roosevelt reported to
Congress on his just completed meeting with Soviet Premier Josef Stalin
and Churchill at Yalta on the Crimean Peninsula in the Soviet Union.
Roosevelt
reiterated that Nazi unconditional surrender meant American-Soviet
post-war cooperation in running the affairs of both eastern and western
Europe; that “the political and economic problems of any area liberated
from Nazi conquest … are a joint responsibility of all three
Governments”—the USA, Britain, and the USSR. He insisted that the coming
peace should be the end of the failed system of “exclusive alliances,
the spheres of influence, the balances of power”—i.e., the old British
system of divide-and-rule.
But at that moment Dulles had already begun secret negotiations in Bern with German Gen. Karl Wolff,[9]head
of the SS forces in Italy, for Britain and the USA to reach a separate
peace with Germany, allowing the redeployment of German assets against
Russia. On March 13, British commander Harold Alexander sent the
American General Lemnitzer (accompanied by British General Terence
Airey, an intelligence officer on Alexander’s staff) to Switzerland, to
continue these talks. Dulles, Lemnitzer, Airey and Wolff now met
repeatedly in Lugano, Switzerland.
These talks came to be known as Operation Sunrise. Dulles and Lemnitzer would gain great notoriety, and applause in London, for this betrayal of their Commander-in-Chief.
Roosevelt
was told only what Dulles and the British wanted him to think—that the
talks with Gen. Wolff were merely preliminary, to arrange a meeting with
Gen. Alexander at his Caserta headquarters to negotiate a surrender.
Soviet
Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov sent a letter to the American
ambassador in Moscow, Averell Harriman, on March 22, protesting that the
Dulles/British meetings had been occurring for two weeks behind the
back of the Soviets. From Roosevelt’s reply,[10]
it appears the President was not aware that actual negotiations were
already under way, on the British premise that World War was to continue
indefinitely—now against Russia.
The Post-Colonial World
The
U.S. President had then recently stated very publicly his anti-colonial
outlook for the post-war world, in contradiction to the plans of his
London opponents. Roosevelt said in his press conference February 23,
1945, aboard the U.S.S. Quincy, en route home from Yalta:
I
have been terribly worried about Indo-China [Vietnam and neighboring
countries]. I talked to [China’s Generalissimo] Chiang Kai-shek in
Cairo, Stalin in Teheran. They both agree with me. The French have been
in there some hundred years….
[Chiang]
said that [Indo-China] should not go back to the French, that they have
been there for over 100 years and had done nothing about educating
them, that for every dollar they have put in, they have taken out ten….
With
the Indo-Chinese, there is a feeling that they ought to be independent
but they are not ready for it. I suggested at the time, that Indo-China
be set up under trusteeship—have a Frenchman, one or two Indo-Chinese, a
Chinese, and a Russian because they are on the coast, and maybe a
Filipino and an American—to educate them for self-government….
Stalin
liked the idea. Chiang liked the idea. The British don’t like it. It
might bust up their empire, because if the Indo-Chinese were to work
together and eventually get their independence, the Burmese might do the
same thing to England….
[Reporter’s question:] Is that Churchill’s idea on all territory out there, that he wants it back just the way they were?
The President: Yes, he is mid-Victorian on all things like that….
[Reporter’s
question:] Do you remember that speech the Prime Minister made about
the fact that he was not made Prime Minister of Great Britain to see the
empire fall apart?
The President: Dear old Winston will never learn on that point. He has made his specialty on that point….[11]
President
Roosevelt died April 12. A surrender of Nazi military forces in Italy
was finally signed at Alexander’s Caserta headquarters on April 29, only
eight days before the total German surrender in Europe. But a great
deal of evil had been set in motion in the Swiss talks.
Roosevelt’s
death before he had secured the peace was a catastrophe for America and
the world. Those FDR had called the “Tories” rushed in to assert
control over U.S. strategy. By tradition of family and institutions,
these London/Wall Street royalists had never accepted the principles of
the American Revolution. They had gained power over U.S. affairs at the
dawn of the 20th century, after the assassination of President William
McKinley in 1901 and the rise of such figures as President Theodore
Roosevelt and President Woodrow Wilson. But the 1930s crash of their
misrule had allowed FDR, with his New Deal and infrastructure
development, to bring back that American devotion to progress that has
inspired the world’s nationalists and modernizers. With FDR out of the
way, the leading Anglo-American faction now emphasized
financial-imperial aims, under the theme of “freedom” versus
“communism.”
The
British shut the Soviets out of the Wolff negotiations on the grounds
that the Soviets must not participate in post-war arrangements in Italy
or other West Europe countries, while the British did not desire the
Allies to participate in arrangements in East European countries that
would be occupied by Soviet forces. This was the beginning of the
division of the world which became known as the Cold War. [12]
Allen
Dulles and British MI6 aided many other top Nazi war criminals along
with Karl Wolff to evade prosecution at the Nuremberg war crimes trials.
They went out via the “ratlines” in Europe, the Mideast, and Latin
America to prop up dictators and run covert armies. Among them were
Klaus Barbie (the SS mass murderer in France); Reinhard Gehlen (Nazi
intelligence officer who became post-war Germany’s intelligence service
chief under the direct supervision of the CIA and MI6); Otto Skorzeny
(head of the SS commando units, master of stay-behind covert armies and
death squads in Europe, Africa and South America); and Hjalmar Schacht
(Skorzeny’s father-in-law, banker, protégé of Bank of England Governor
Montagu Norman and of John Foster Dulles). Schacht had coordinated the
fundraising to install Hitler as Germany’s dictator, and had supervised
the building of the Nazi war machine.[13]
The
14th Waffen SS Grenadier Division (1st Galician), a unit of eight
thousand Ukrainian troops under Nazi command, including concentration
camp guards, surrendered to General Alexander. Instead of being sent
back to the USSR to be broken down, they were dispersed to Britain, to
Canada, and throughout Europe for use in new underground secret armies
under NATO. The direct heirs of these and other wings of the Ukrainian
fascist Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) still celebrate
Hitler’s war with Russia. They have considerable influence today in NATO
and Washington corridors of power, which they brought to bear in
rallying U.S. support for the Anglo-American coup of February 2014 that
installed the present regime in Ukraine.[14]
2. Kennedy Views the Postwar Tragedy
In April 1945, as the world war drew to its heartbreaking and uncertain end, John F. Kennedy[15]
became a special correspondent for Hearst Newspapers. Kennedy covered
the tense conference (July 17 to August 2, 1945) at Potsdam, near
Berlin, between Churchill, Stalin, and Harry Truman, Roosevelt’s
successor.
Behind the scenes in Berlin, the British were pursuing the logic of Operation Sunrise. With Roosevelt dead, Churchill had commissioned a top secret military plan, Operation Unthinkable,[16]
in which German armies, rather than being demobilized, were to be put
back into action alongside British and American divisions for all-out
war against the Soviet Union. The final Unthinkable report came back to Churchill July 11.
On
July 16, the day before the Potsdam conference opened, the United
States successfully tested the first atomic bomb (in New Mexico).
Churchill was in on the secret, which gave even graver implications to Unthinkable. Churchill commented that the now nuclear-armed Truman was elated at Potsdam, and was “bossing” Stalin around.
Mid-conference,
on July 26, Labour Party leader Clement Attlee was declared winner of
the British election and replaced Churchill as Prime Minister. Unthinkable went onto the shelf—but the Soviets did not forget the intent of the British Establishment.
As Truman sailed back home from Europe, on August 6, Hiroshima, Japan was destroyed by an atomic bomb.[17]
A
shadow of fear soon covered the Earth; by 1953, the United States and
the Soviets would both develop hydrogen bombs capable of ending all
human life.
Years
later, John Kennedy indicated that by 1946, when he first ran for a
seat in Congress, he was already surveying with bitterness the dark
world his generation had inherited. He labored to understand what had
gone wrong. How had Roosevelt’s peace policy been destroyed? He believed
that Soviet Communism distorted history and violated human nature; but
that America’s own mission of uplifting mankind was being buried in the
fast-widening world division. JFK won a seat in Congress in 1946. Within
his family, he was taking on the leading political role his brother
Joseph had been expected to play before he had died in the war, and the
assumption grew in Kennedy’s mind that he himself would have to lead the
way out of the national policy disaster.
The
problem that Kennedy would have to confront, was that the
London-centered imperial system which FDR had sought to abolish,
persisted after his death in the form of a global financial-looting
apparatus, which controlled continents even without formal colonial
governments. The preservation and expansion of this system underlay the
activities of the Anglo-American secret intelligence agencies and the
Atlantic military alliance structure after World War II.
The Special Operations Executive
We
may observe the realities of this cryptic governance by looking into
the origin of the “stay-behind” covert military-political armies that
the British, with help from Dulles, Lemnitzer and some old Nazis, put in
place around Europe.
The
Special Operations Executive (SOE) had been formed in 1940 as Britain’s
wartime agency for spying, sabotage, and assassinations within
Nazi-occupied areas. SOE was run principally by two men, SOE commander
Roundell Palmer, and SOE director Charles Hambro. They were exalted
figures in the City of London financial center and the associated
imperial apparatus.
Roundell
Cecil Palmer, the 3rd Earl of Selborne, was born into imperial power as
the son of the High Commissioner for South Africa,[18]
the nephew and protégé of Lord Robert Cecil, and the grandson of Lord
Salisbury (Robert Arthur Talbot Gascoyne-Cecil), who had been UK Prime
Minister thrice during 1885-1902. The Palmers were one of the families
comprising the “Cecil Bloc,” the “great nexus of power, influence and
privilege controlled by the Cecil family” which “has been all-pervasive
in British life since 1886.”[19]
Roundell
Palmer and his Palmer ancestors were also the hierarchical leading
family in the Most Worshipful Company of Mercers—the very highest
ranking of the secret society “livery” companies running the City of
London Corporation. These livery groups are the core of the
centuries-old apparatus for funds management, connecting the Royal
Family, the London banks, and their colonial enterprises. Roundell
Palmer was a director of the Union Minière du Haut Katanga corporation
in the Congo, in association with the Royal Family’s own central-Africa
holdings.
As Minister of Economic Warfare, Palmer selected Hambro, his City colleague, to direct SOE operations.
Sir
Charles Hambro, of an old British/Scandinavian banking family, had been
a powerful director of the Bank of England working with Montagu Norman
to install and nurture the Hitler regime in Germany, and to found the
Swiss-based Bank for International Settlements (with several Nazis on
its board), through which Nazi loot and SS funds would be used for
post-war objectives.
The
Special Operations Executive was officially disestablished after the
Nazi surrender. But Roundell Palmer insisted that its personnel,
assassination capabilities, assets, and intelligence arrangements be
continued underground in Western Europe, in a quasi-war against the
Soviet Union.
The
new “intelligence community” was managed from the Privy Council, from
the permanent government apparatus that ran the Cabinet and Foreign
Office, from White’s Club, and from the Mercers’ haunts and the City
board rooms, regardless of elections or political parties. The very
existence of MI6, the British Secret Intelligence Service, was not
officially acknowledged until 1994.
The
U.S. marriage to imperial Britain for the Cold War led to the 1947
National Security Act, creating the Central Intelligence Agency and the
Defense Department. Reacting to Britain’s threat to pull its forces out
of Greece, the United States declared the “Truman Doctrine” in March
1947, which committed the United States to building up an anti-Soviet
presence in Europe. Marshall Plan funding for European war-recovery was
also partially channeled into Cold War geopolitical intrigue, while the
war-devastated Soviet Union was excluded from such assistance.
The Western European Union, NATO, and the Rise of the Dulleses
Gen.
Lyman Lemnitzer’s deep British connection made him the natural choice
for Defense Secretary James Forrestal to send to London in 1948 as the
U.S. observer in secret talks establishing the Western European Union
(WEU), a military alliance of Britain, France, Belgium, Luxembourg, and
the Netherlands. Planning sessions were held at British General
Montgomery’s headquarters in Fontainebleau, France.
Over
the next year, a Clandestine Committee of this WEU’s military arm, the
Western Union Defense Organization (WUDO), went into operation under the
guidance of MI6 director Stewart Menzies.[20]
The
WUDO itself was transformed into the North Atlantic Treaty Organization
(NATO), as a result of British strategy operating on the United States
as follows:
Beginning
in 1948, President Harry Truman was counseled by Sir Oliver Franks, the
British Ambassador. Franks had helped ram acceptance of the new
Atlantic Alliance through the British government, past the
national-sovereignty objections of Labour politicians. Franks had been
sent to Washington to overcome the same misgivings in America.
Anglophile Secretary of State Dean Acheson boasted in his memoirs that
he met regularly in secret with Franks and made him a virtual member of
the President’s Cabinet.
Truman
soon brought in John Foster Dulles as advisor to the State Department,
and Allen Dulles as the CIA’s director of covert operations.
Under-Secretary of State Robert A. Lovett (Averell Harriman’s partner
and client to the Dulles brothers in the Hitler-buildup) ran the U.S.
negotiations for the Atlantic Alliance. Under heavy British pressure,
Congress voted for the United States to join NATO in 1949. Kim Philby, a
Soviet agent still working for the British, then came to Washington as
Ambassador Franks’s first secretary and as the MI6 liaison with the CIA.
Philby fed Soviet paranoia with accounts of evil American deeds, thus
cementing the Cold War Anglo-American alliance. Sir Oliver Franks went
back to London to become chairman of Lloyds Bank.
The
Western Union Defense Organization clandestine structure set up under
Sir Stewart Menzies persisted under NATO auspices. It managed the
MI6/CIA-run secret armies with their old-Nazi and Italian fascist
components, which were to infest Europe over the following decades. Gen.
Lemnitzer, running back and forth between Washington and Europe in the
late 1940s, was given control of the logistics for American military
supplies to the Western Union/NATO apparatus.[21]
3. JFK Opens the Attack
Congressman
John F. Kennedy toured the Middle East and Asia in 1951, accompanied by
his younger brother Robert. Kennedy was angered to see that the United
States was giving up its own Revolutionary heritage, in support of
British and other imperial aims.
Among
the places he visited was Iran, where Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh
had just nationalized the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company to end Britain’s
domination and impoverishment of the country. President Roosevelt had
been in Teheran eight years earlier. FDR had commissioned the Hurley
Report, supporting Iran’s use of its own resources free of imperialism,
as a model for the national sovereignty to be gained by all former
colonies.[22]
But now Dean Acheson was coordinating with Sir Oliver Franks and a
joint CIA-MI6 team, planning a coup d’etat against Mossadegh,—whose
courage was then inspiring nationalist revolts by Egypt’s Gamal Abdel
Nasser and others across the rest of North Africa.
Kennedy went to Israel and Arab countries, which were embroiled in the bitter conflict brewed under British rule in the area.
After
Yalta, Roosevelt had called for economic development of the desperately
poor Muslim countries, based on the sovereign use of their oil
resources, as the only road to regional peace.[23]
But now, masses of hopeless Palestinian exiles sat in camps, and the
Anglo-American Cold War alliance had buried FDR’s plans for progress.
In
Vietnam, Congressman Kennedy sought out his own U.S., French and
Vietnamese sources to get behind official explanations for the policies
that would soon lead the United States to disaster. FDR and his
Vietnamese ally Ho Chi Minh had called for that country’s independence.
But in 1945, the British army had taken over Vietnam from Japan, and had
given control back to the French empire. When Truman sided with the
empires, Ho had turned to the Communists for support, and war again
consumed the region.
Returning
home, Kennedy aired a blistering radio report on the sickness of
America’s alliance with its imperial opponents. Six years after the
death of his Commander-in-Chief, Kennedy precisely echoed FDR’s warnings
against imperialist aims.
[The
post-war colonial world] is an area in which poverty and sickness and
disease are rampant, in which injustice and inequality are old and
ingrained, and in which the fires of nationalism so long dormant have
been kindled and are now ablaze. It is an area of our world that for 100
years and more has been the source of empire for Western Europe—for
England and France and Holland….
A
Middle East Command operating without the cooperation and support of
the Middle East countries … not only would intensify every anti-western
force now active in that area, but from a military standpoint would be
doomed to failure. The very sands of the desert would rise to oppose the
imposition of outside control on the destinies of these proud peoples….
The
true enemy of the Arab world is poverty and want…. Our intervention in
behalf of England’s oil investments in Iran, directed more at the
preservation of interests outside Iran than at Iran’s own development,
our avowed willingness to assume an almost imperial military
responsibility for the safety of the Suez, our failure to deal
effectively after three years with the terrible human tragedy of the
more than 700,000 Arab refugees, these are things that have failed to
sit well with Arab desires and make empty the promises of the Voice of
America….
In
Indo-China [Vietnam] we have allied ourselves to the desperate effort
of a French regime to hang onto the remnants of empire…. To check the
southern drive of Communism makes sense, but not only through reliance
on force of arms….
[O]ne
finds too many of our representatives toadying to the shorter aims of
other Western nations, with no eagerness to understand the real hopes
and desires of the peoples to which they are accredited, too often
aligning themselves too definitely with the “haves” and regarding the
actions of the “have-nots” as not merely an effort to cure injustice,
but as something sinister and subversive.
The
East of today is no longer the East of Palmerston and Disraeli and
Cromer…. We want, we may need, allies in ideas, in resources, even in
arms, but if we would have allies, we must first of all gather to
ourselves friends.[24]
Kennedy
became a Senator in 1953. Meanwhile, President Eisenhower brought in
John Foster Dulles as Secretary of State and Allen Dulles as Director of
Central Intelligence, and began elevating Gen. Lemnitzer, the
Dulles-British cohort in Operation Sunrise, to successively higher commands.
Thus,
despite the better intentions President Eisenhower revealed in policies
such as the Atoms for Peace initiative he made at the United Nations in
December 1953, there was a dreadful continuity of British imperial
control over crucial U.S. government functions, reaching from the Truman
era forward into Eisenhower’s Presidency. It was personified by the
Dulles brothers. The effects came quickly, around the world.
Iran’s
government was overthrown in 1953 by British Intelligence and the
Dulles CIA. A ghoulish dictatorship put Prime Minister Mossadegh into
solitary confinement, and he later died under house arrest. The rescued
British oil giant changed its name to British Petroleum. Anti-Western
fury ultimately would lead to Iran’s Islamic Revolution of 1979.
In
1954, the CIA overthrew Guatemala’s President Jacobo Arbenz to reverse
his nationalization of the United Fruit Company, whose plantations had
kept the population in feudal backwardness. Among the charges hurled at
the government was that it proposed to divert a river used by a
plantation, to build a hydroelectric station. The Dulles law firm
represented United Fruit, and Allen Dulles had been on the company’s
board of directors. The coup helped lock Central America into poverty
that bred drug-smuggling, violent insurrections, and migrations of
hopeless masses north to the United States.
The
French were driven out of Vietnam in 1954, despite U.S. backing. During
the climactic battle at Dien Bien Phu, Secretary of State John Foster
Dulles offered to nuclear-bomb the battlefield, but President Eisenhower
decided against the plan. A new U.S.-backed regime was then installed
in the southern half of Vietnam; warfare dragged on for years.
In
1955 (two years after the end of the Korean War), Lyman Lemnitzer
became Commander of the U.S. Army forces in the Far East. He pushed for
bringing tactical nuclear weapons into Korea.[25]
Battlefield nuclear missiles came over in 1957; these weapons were
withdrawn from Korea only in the 1990s. The North Korean Communist
regime, increasingly paranoid, began developing its own nuclear weapons.
In
1956, President Eisenhower acted to curb America’s involvement in
overseas colonial operations, by demanding an end to Britain’s imperial
invasion of Egypt. He acted diplomatically with the Soviet Union and
through economic pressure, to force Britain, France, and Israel to
withdraw the troops that had invaded Egypt to seize the Suez Canal and
attempt to overthrow President Nasser. Eisenhower would never move
directly to break the power of the British and their American partners,
but in JFK, that enemy faction now saw a new, more threatening
challenger arise on the American scene.
4. Going Head to Head
Who now remembers how John Kennedy first shook up politics and became world famous?
He spoke to the U.S. Senate on July 2, 1957, on “Imperialism—the Enemy of Freedom.”[26]
As Americans prepared to celebrate the July 4th anniversary of their
Revolutionary War for Independence, Kennedy blasted the U.S. alliance
with European imperialism to violently suppress African and Asian
freedom—for U.S. actions vis-a-vis the raging war in Algeria had
differed sharply from the American position on Suez.
That
speech, and the reaction to it, put Kennedy in the kind of public
spotlight Abraham Lincoln had stepped into when he debated Stephen
Douglas over slavery, a century before. As Lincoln’s emergence had
alarmed the dominant pro-slavery leaders, so now the alarm rang at
White’s Club in London, at NATO command centers, and among those who
considered themselves the permanent U.S. government. From that moment
until his 1963 assassination, JFK was head to head with his and
mankind’s enemies.
French
troops, NATO-sponsored and U.S.-helicopter-equipped, bombed, burned,
tortured and assassinated Arabs fighting for Algerian national
independence. But Kennedy said imperial troops could never prevail over
rebels representing the hopes of the native population. Imperial failure
was as certain as it had been in Vietnam, into which we had “poured
money and materiel … in a hopeless attempt to save for the French a land
that did not want to be saved, in a war in which the enemy was both
everywhere and nowhere at the same time.”
Kennedy
reported that he had undertaken “an intensive study of the problem” for
more than a year. He chaired the Senate Subcommittee on United Nations
Affairs—and he had worked out the July 2 speech in personal cooperation
with the Algerian rebel leadership. He stressed that he had long
criticized U.S. policy, hitting the betrayal of our interests by both
the Truman Democrats and the Dulles Republicans.
He
attacked the reigning axiom that every other interest must be
sacrificed to the anti-Communist Cold War. Why hadn’t this conflict
ended long ago?
[We]
have been told that the war was being kept alive only because of
interference and meddling by Colonel Nasser … or … because of Russian
and Communist meddling in Algeria. None of these explanations which seek
to make outsiders the real agents of the Algerian rebellion carries
much conviction any longer, … as shown [by] attempts to suppress …
critical newspaper and public comment….
If
we are to secure the friendship of the Arab, the African, and the
Asian—and we must, despite what Mr. [Secretary of State John Foster]
Dulles says about our not being in a popularity contest—we cannot hope
to accomplish it … by selling them free enterprise, by describing the
perils of communism or the prosperity of the United States, or limiting
our dealings to military pacts. No, the strength of our appeal … lies in
our traditional and deeply felt philosophy of freedom and independence
for all peoples everywhere.
Kennedy
inserted into this speech a remarkable historical clue. It helps us see
how his “intensive study of the problem” had inspired him to revive,
from the late Franklin Roosevelt, the American tradition of
anti-imperial leadership. JFK spoke of “Sultan Ben Youssef, with whom
President Roosevelt had conferred at the time of the Casablanca
Conference.”
Back
in 1943, FDR had sought out this Sultan of Morocco to assure him of
U.S. support for his country’s economic development and independence
from France. The meeting had deeply moved the Sultan, an FDR favorite
who had stood up against the Vichy French government’s attempts to exile
Morocco’s huge Jewish population to Nazi death camps. The Sultan
afterwards credited FDR with having ignited his and other nationalist
movements for self-rule. By 1956 he had successfully negotiated with
France and Spain for Moroccan independence; one month after Kennedy’s
groundbreaking speech, the Sultan took the title of King Mohammad V.
Kennedy
concluded by offering a Senate resolution, calling on President
Eisenhower and Secretary of State Dulles to place U.S. influence behind
efforts, either through NATO “or through the good offices of the Prime
Minister of Tunisia and the Sultan of Morocco,” to move toward Algerian
independence and the end of the bitter war.
The
Kennedy speech electrified African nationalists. A stream of African,
Arab, and Asian leaders came to confer with the young Senator, whom they
wanted to see elected as the next U.S President.[27]
John Foster Dulles counterattacked Kennedy on Cold War grounds, as did the New York Times, and Dean Acheson and other anti-FDR Democrats.
French
imperial leaders and their scheming “stay-behind” NATO sponsors were
particularly furious: JFK had pointedly made common cause with French
people of good will who agreed with his standpoint, but who had been
afraid to speak out against the proto-fascist hardliners running
France’s government.
The
most extreme hardline elements of the French army and secret services
had been operational partners of British MI6 and Dulles’s faction since
1946, fighting in Indochina, and then in Algeria. By 1958 the Algerian
Arab rebels provoked the most savage, Hitler-style repression, torture,
and assassination by these French forces, throwing both Algeria and
France into chaos.
The
hardliners staged a coup in Algeria against the “weak” Paris
government. Charles de Gaulle came out of retirement to solve the great
national crisis. He created a new, Fifth Republic, became President, and
led the country out of the disaster of futile British-aligned
imperialism and permanent war. The hardliners and their British and
American partners, having expected de Gaulle to hold onto the Algerian
colony, cried “treason” against de Gaulle and vowed revenge. The seat of
this hot fury was NATO headquarters in Paris, France.
Throughout
this period, the Cold War had grown increasingly dangerous. Soviet
forces crushed the Anglo-American-encouraged 1956 revolt in Hungary. The
nuclear arms race intensified after the Soviets rocketed the first
satellite, Sputnik, into Earth orbit in 1957. The insane strategy of
“limited nuclear war” gained credence in NATO.
5. In an Age of Dread, the New Frontier
Senator
Kennedy announced his Presidential candidacy on January 2, 1960. As
Kennedy campaigned, President Eisenhower prepared to meet Soviet Premier
Nikita Khrushchov at a crucial May 16 East-West-South summit conference
in Paris. President de Gaulle and India’s President Jawaharlal Nehru
had planned the meeting to promote nuclear disarmament, and East-West
cooperation for aid to underdeveloped countries.[28]
But
two weeks before the summit, Dulles’s CIA sent a U2 spy plane on a
photo mission over the USSR. It was shot down; its pilot was captured
and confessed his mission on May 1, deeply embarrassing Eisenhower and
collapsing the Eisenhower-Khrushchov summit meeting. Khrushchov lashed
out at the United States and disinvited Eisenhower from his planned June
visit to Moscow.
Kennedy
meanwhile won Democratic primary elections, famously taking West
Virginia May 10, on his way towards a November final-election victory.
The NATO partners hastened to pre-empt any serious alteration in global
arrangements.
Central Africa was their first target.
In
January, 1960, Congo nationalist leader Patrice Lumumba had declared
the independence of Congo from the rule of Belgium. The British were the
predominant power in the Congo, exercising control through the Union
Minière du Haut Katanga corporation, owner of most of Congo’s valuable
minerals, including uranium.
Calling
for the use of his county’s resources to bring his people out of
backwardness—in other words, precisely Senator Kennedy’s program—Patrice
Lumumba became Congo’s first elected Prime Minister in June 1960. In
July, the British detonated war against the Congo: the
British-controlled Katanga province, containing most of Congo’s mineral
wealth, declared its secession from the newly independent nation.
Days later, the Democratic Party nominated Kennedy for President.
On
September 14, the elected Congolese government was forcibly overthrown
by Belgian military and anti-nationalist paramilitary forces sponsored
by the British power center in Katanga and their CIA partners. Prime
Minister Lumumba was kidnapped, escaped, and was repeatedly hemmed in by
his would-be assassins.
Lemnitzer’s Special Ops
In
October 1960, Gen. Lyman Lemnitzer was appointed chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff. Now the two men who had betrayed President Roosevelt in
Operation Sunrise sat at the top of the U.S. strategic services apparatus, Dulles at CIA and Lemnitzer at the Pentagon.
Lemnitzer
had displayed what his faction viewed as his qualifications for this
role back in August, when, as Army chief of staff, he announced that the
Army was all ready to “restore order” in the United States after a
nuclear war with the Soviet Union—to bring back normalcy just as the
military does after a flood or a riot.[29]
To
move a bit closer to that “orderly” nuclear war, Chairman Lemnitzer now
went ahead with plans to install U.S. nuclear ballistic missiles in
Turkey,[30] on the border of the Soviet Union.
Lemnitzer
and Dulles meanwhile proceeded with secret arrangements for an invasion
of Cuba and the overthrow of Fidel Castro. His rebel movement had taken
power in Cuba in 1959, and Castro had confiscated foreign-owned
properties, including the plantations of the Dulles company, United
Fruit. The Russians had then given Castro military aid against an
expected U.S. counterrevolution. Russian military personnel were on the
island. An invasion might lead to shooting between the two great powers,
both now armed with nuclear weapons a thousand times as deadly as the
Hiroshima bomb, and both exploding them in open-air tests.
The American public was then widely debating the doomsday threat.
In June 1960, two veteran Washington journalists had issued a startling book about the 1945 U.S. nuclear bombings of Japan.[31]
Fletcher Knebel and Charles Bailey had used newly available archival
sources and had interviewed participants in the nuclear decision-making
process. They showed that many relevant military and government leaders
had not been allowed to know of the bomb’s development or the attack
plans; and that warnings by critical scientists were brushed aside when
Truman, encouraged by Churchill, had made the call. Knebel and Bailey
made clear that the atomic bomb had forever changed the logic of
full-scale war, because a new World War would be civilization’s suicide.
John
Kennedy was elected President on November 8, 1960. He sent
representatives to Africa to announce America’s renewed commitment to
national sovereignty. They reported that African crowds everywhere were
chanting “Kennedy! Kennedy! Kennedy!”
He
would have ten weeks to plan a government, before his January 20, 1961
inauguration. In Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America,
hopes rose for a new U.S. role that might dispel the fearful tension.
Seeking
to take office and get some kind of start without provoking open
insurrection from the Anglo-American establishment, Kennedy announced
that Allen Dulles would stay on at the helm of the CIA, and J. Edgar
Hoover would remain at the FBI. To placate Wall Street, he made
investment banker Douglas Dillon the Treasury secretary. [32] Lyman Lemnitzer’s term as Joint Chiefs chairman was to run until 1962, and by tradition it would then be extended.
But
JFK also brought in people intensely loyal to his promises of a new
direction. His brother Robert, who had been by his side since the 1951
anti-imperial tour, would ride shotgun as attorney general.
On
January 17, three days before Kennedy’s inauguration, the British MI6
station chief in Congo, Ms. Daphne Park, reportedly gave the signal for
the forces that the Anglo-Americans had assembled, and Congo head of
state Patrice Lumumba was assassinated in a remote location to which he
had been kidnapped. [33]
The incoming U.S. President was not notified of the plan, nor was he
even informed, until two months later (February 13), that the murder had
even occurred.
On
January 17, 1960, the day the Anglo-Americans murdered Lumumba,
President Eisenhower delivered his Farewell Address. He warned:
In
the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of
unwarranted influence … by the military-industrial complex. The
potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will
persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our
liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted.
Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing
of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our
peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper
together.[34]
President John F. Kennedy’s January 20 Inaugural Address[35]
called for a reversal of the slide toward nuclear war with Russia, and
announced clearly the return of the American founding mission:
[M]an
holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human
poverty and all forms of human life. And yet the same revolutionary
beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the
globe….
He
awakened in young people, especially, a passion to improve the world.
Colonial-sector leaders already knew him better than most Americans, and
were thrilled at the suddenly enhanced prospects for progress.
Kwame
Nkrumah arrived in Washington March 8, 1961, becoming the first foreign
head of state to visit President Kennedy. They began working together
on overcoming political and financial roadblocks to Nkrumah’s great
project: a dam on the Volta River through Ghana, to generate cheap
electricity that could help industrialize West Africa.[36]
6. Regime Change
Allen
Dulles now pressed upon the President the plan he and General Lemnitzer
had concocted to overthrow Fidel Castro. Kennedy was told that Cuban
exiles would invade and do the fighting, not U.S. troops. Dulles warned
that if the plan were not approved, armed and dangerous exiles could be
smoldering in Florida, directing their anger at the President. Seeing
Castro as a brutal dictator close to American shores, and being as yet
unsure of his own Presidential leadership, Kennedy approved the plan on
April 4, 1961. He specified that U.S. warships and combat aircraft would
not be allowed to support the enterprise. But Dulles and Lemnitzer
planned to compel Kennedy to throw in U.S. forces when the 1,500-man
invasion would inevitably falter.
Just
five days before the Cuban invasion went ahead, a Dulles representative
in Spain assured French generals that the United States would recognize
their new regime if they would overthrow President de Gaulle and
install a military dictatorship to stop Algerian independence.[37]
The
invasion at Cuba’s Bay of Pigs April 17-19, collapsed quickly, a
terrible embarrassment to the new President. Confronting Kennedy,
Dulles, and Lemnitzer demanded that he bring in naval and air cover to
save the operation, but he kept his resolve not to allow it. He took
upon himself full responsibility for the plan’s failure. The word went
out at the CIA and the Pentagon that Kennedy was weak-unfit-dangerous.
Just in case curious Congressmen might meddle into the affair, Gen.
Lemnitzer destroyed his aide’s notes of the Joint Chiefs’ discussions
leading into the Bay of Pigs.[38]
On
April 21, 1961, two days after Castro defeated the Cuban invasion,
French generals led by former NATO Central Europe Commander Gen. Maurice
Challe staged an attempted coup d’etat in France. Thousands of
paratroopers were stationed not far from Paris, preparing to move on the
Presidential palace. De Gaulle appealed to the French people to support
him and save their country. Millions of French citizens blocked the
coup plotters with strikes and other pro-government actions. Directly
countering Dulles, President Kennedy contacted his French counterpart
and pledged full support, including military assistance if de Gaulle
wanted it.
New York Times
reporter James Reston wrote that the CIA had masterminded “the rebel
attack on Cuba last week, the U-2 spy plane incident a year ago, and
[now] was involved in an embarrassing liaison with the anti-Gaullist
officers who staged last week’s insurrection in Algiers.”
[In]
the last few days, the President has looked into angry reports from
Paris that the C.I.A. was in touch with the insurrectionists who tried
to overthrow the de Gaulle government of France…. C.I.A. officials gave a
luncheon here in Washington for Jacques Soustelle, a leader of the
anti- de Gaulle movement, when M. Soustelle was … in Washington [last
December.]
All
this has increased the feeling in the White House that the CIA has gone
beyond the bounds of an objective intelligence-gathering agency and has
becomethe advocate of men and policies that have embarrassed the
administration.
Reston reported that Kennedy wanted to bring in his brother Robert to replace Dulles at the CIA and clean the Agency up.[39] Claude Krief, reporting for the liberal weekly magazine L’Express,
gave details on a clandestine meeting held April 12, 1961 in Madrid, of
“various foreign agents, including members of the CIA and the Algiers
conspirators, who disclose their plans to the CIA men.” The CIA men were
said to have complained that de Gaulle’s policy was “paralyzing NATO
and rendering the defense of Europe impossible,” and assured the French
that if they succeeded, Washington would recognize the new government
within two days.[40]
By
the end of April, Kennedy made it known that he considered the CIA
disloyal, that—as the Paris newspapers put it—it constituted “a
reactionary state-within a state.”[41]
Kennedy forced the resignation of Allen Dulles, his deputy Richard
Bissell (involved in both the Cuban and Paris disasters), and Charles
Cabell, the CIA’s liaison with Gen. Lemnitzer. Dulles left the CIA in
November 1961, but within a month or two he was back at the center of
the ruling group at the Agency, giving and receiving briefings several
times a week. Those who frequented Dulles’s house in Georgetown viewed
the President as a usurper-weak-dangerous.[42]
American
opinion rallied behind Kennedy after he took public responsibility for
the Bay of Pigs disaster. Resolving to put his own stamp on the
Presidency, Kennedy announced to Congress on May 25, 1961 the dramatic
goal of sending an American safely to the Moon before the end of the
decade.
But
with the news from Cuba, the Congo, and Paris, murder was in the air in
Washington. Journalists Fletcher Knebel and Charles Bailey were working
on an urgent follow-up to their 1960 book on nuclear war. Knebel
interviewed Air Force Chief of Staff Curtis LeMay, who had led the
firebombing of Japan, and had transmitted the orders for Hiroshima.
Knebel picked up the scent of madness that permeated the Pentagon.
Knebel and Bailey now crafted an account of a future military coup d’etat against the United States President, to be called Seven Days in May.
The beliefs and actions of the chief perpetrator, a fictionalized
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff named “James Matoon Scott”
mirrored the real-life role of Lyman Lemnitzer. To make certain that
this identification was not missed, the authors gave the fictional
President the last name “Lyman.” The plotters target him as
weak-unfit-dangerous, denouncing his attempt to get a nuclear
disarmament treaty with the Soviet Union.
7. Shall Mankind Die?
The
real chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Lyman Lemnitzer, met with President
Kennedy and his National Security Council on July 20, 1961, just as the
East-West crisis over Berlin threatened to explode into immediate hot
war in Europe. Lemnitzer presented his plan for a surprise, preemptive
nuclear attack on the Soviet Union, to take place in 1963. This was
Churchill’s Operation Unthinkable, updated for thermonuclear use.
Lemnitzer
cautioned that if all-out nuclear war were begun a year earlier, it
would not be as effective in utterly annihilating Russia; he said that
only by 1963 would the United States have absolute superiority in
delivery systems, at which point the Soviets would possess no real
ability to retaliate. The President asked Lemnitzer how long Americans
would have to remain in fallout shelters after the rival country was
exterminated. A Lemnitzer aide replied that about two weeks should be
sufficient. Kennedy concluded the meeting by directing that “no member
in attendance at the meeting disclose even the subject of the meeting.”
A
memorandum with notes of this meeting was declassified only in June of
1993. Professor James Galbraith, son of JFK’s trusted strategic advisor
John Kenneth Galbraith, discovered this declassified memo and
immediately brought it to the attention of the public.[43] His article received virtually no attention in the corporate media.
McGeorge
Bundy recalled that “In the summer of 1961 [Kennedy] went through a
formal briefing on the net assessment of a general nuclear war between
the two superpowers, and he expressed his own reaction to [Secretary of
State] Dean Rusk as they walked from the cabinet room to the Oval Office
for a private meeting on other subjects: ‘And we call ourselves the
human race.’”[44]
On March 13, 1962, Joint Chiefs Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer gave Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara a plan for the United States to carry out terror attacks against its own armed forces and civilians,
to be blamed on the Castro regime as “pretexts which would provide
justification for US military intervention in Cuba.” Known as Operation Northwoods, the plan would remain secret until declassified in the 1990s. It is now available online.[45]
The state of mind discernable behind Northwoods
comes straight out of the history of the British Empire. “False flag”
terror had been the British specialty in Africa, India, and Ireland, and
through synthetic Muslim movements in the Mideast. During and after the
Cold War, it has been the trademark of the MI6 and Special Air Services
that have instructed and guided NATO strategy.
Among Lemnitzer’s proposals were these:
Bomb
the U.S. base at Guantanamo, Cuba, and destroy U.S. ships—“Lob mortar
shells from outside of base into base…. Blow up ammunition inside the
base; start fires. Burn aircraft on air base (sabotage). Sabotage ship
in harbor; large fires—naphthalene. Sink ship near harbor entrance.
Conduct funerals for mock-victims…. We could blow up a drone (unmanned)
vessel anywhere in the Cuban waters…. The presence of Cuban planes or
ships merely investigating the intent of the vessel could be fairly
compelling evidence that the ship was taken under attack.”
Lie
to news media—“[After] an air/sea rescue operation … to ‘evacuate’
remaining members of the non-existent crew … [c]asualty lists in US
newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.”
Conduct
terror atrocities inside the United States—“We could develop a
Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida
cities and even in Washington. The terror campaign could be pointed at
Cuban refugees seeking haven in the United States. We could sink a
boatload of Cubans en route to Florida (real or simulated). We could
foster attempts on lives of Cuban refugees in the United States even to
the extent of wounding in instances to be widely publicized. Exploding a
few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots ….”
A military attack to “be simulated against a neighboring Caribbean nation….”
An
“incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has
attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner en route from the
United States…. [The] aircraft [used in the fake attack] … could be
painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered
aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami
area….”
“Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft….”
Make it “appear that Communist Cuban MIGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft over international waters in an unprovoked attack.”
Kennedy
dismissed the Northwoods proposal. About a month later, Lemnitzer
simply demanded that the United States stage a full-scale military
invasion of Cuba, without provocation, on the presumption that the
Soviets would not react.[46]
The
President now ordered that Lemnitzer be ousted as chairman of the Joint
Chiefs when his term expired in October 1962, six months hence. Kennedy
designated General Maxwell Taylor to replace Lemnitzer as chairman at
that time, and to supervise Lemnitzer as long as he remained the chief.
Lemnitzer’s British sponsors intervened at this crucial stage to keep
him in a position of power, as he later explained to his authorized
biographer:
[In]
the Spring of 1962 … [he] had been invited by his old World War II
commander, retired Field Marshal Earl Alexander, to come out to his home
near Windsor castle for Easter dinner. The earl was no longer the
British minister of defense [as he had been in the Churchill cabinet,
1952-54], but he was still influential in government affairs, and he was
a lifelong friend of Harold Macmillan, the prime minister. While the
two were walking in his garden, Alexander ask the general about his
retirement plans. When Lemnitzer said he was considering several offers
in the private sector, Alexander asked him if he had ever thought of
succeeding general [Lauris] Norstad as NATO’s supreme Allied Commander.
Lemnitzer said he was surprised and replied ‘Hell no. I’ve never even
thought about it. As far as I know, Larry is doing well there and I’ve
never given it any consideration. Why do you ask?’ Alexander answered
that Macmillan, with whom Lemnitzer had been acquainted when he served
with Alexander in Italy, had asked him to bring up the subject and
inquire if the general was interested. The two went on to talk about
other things, and he put the conversation in the back of his mind until
he returned to Washington…. The next move came from Kennedy, who talked
to Lemnitzer … in June, and told him he wanted to nominate him to
succeed Norstad.[47]
Kennedy
saw the British proposal for Lemnitzer to command NATO military forces
in Europe as a way to kick him out of the Pentagon without provoking an
open revolt by his high-ranking military followers.
8. Against Pure Evil, JFK Did Not Flinch
The novel about a coup d’etat against the U.S. President, Seven Days in May,[48] came out in September 1962. Chilling real-life events made the book a best seller.
On
August 22, a few days before the book’s release, a squad of assassins
on motorcycles had attacked French President de Gaulle’s car with
automatic weapons fire. Bullets passed very near his head, but he
escaped unhurt.
General
Lemnitzer stepped down as chairman of the Joint Chiefs on October 1,
1962, but his departure for Paris NATO headquarters was temporarily
delayed while the hunt was on for the Algerian Secret Army would-be
assassins. Lemnitzer remained at the Pentagon, in the same unofficial
top-boss status among his colleagues as Allen Dulles retained within the
CIA.
Thus
it was amidst a struggle for the survival of lawful government that the
Cuban Missile Crisis began on October 16, 1962. During those terrifying
hours, Seven Days in May was the number one best seller in Washington DC, because no one viewed it as fiction.
A
U.S. spy plane over Cuba took photographs showing that the Soviets had
brought in ballistic missiles capable of striking the United States with
nuclear weapons. The President kept the situation secret until he could
reach a firm decision on what to do, to get the missiles out of Cuba
without starting World War III. The sacked Joint Chiefs chairman,
Lemnitzer, attended the meetings of the special “Executive Committee”
(Excomm) which Kennedy had created to deliberate on the correct path to
take. [49]
A
battle of wills went on day after day. The President and his loyal
staff wanted to give the Russians a way to back down without being
crushed or humiliated. The Dulles-Lemnitzer faction wanted to bomb the
missile sites, and follow that action with an all-out U.S. invasion of
Cuba. They claimed that even if Russian soldiers were killed, the
Russians would do nothing; and that even if the Russians struck back in
Berlin (then divided East-West), the United States could easily defeat
them in a nuclear conflict.
Kennedy
raised the possibility that the USA might remove its missiles from
Turkey in exchange for the Soviets taking theirs out of Cuba. Lemnitzer
reacted angrily that the missiles in Turkey were not ours to
withdraw—they belonged to NATO!
A partly fictionalized film about the Cuban Missile Crisis—13 Days,
starring Kevin Costner—omits Lemnitzer from its depiction of those
secret strategy meetings. Nonetheless, the film provides a sense of the
Lemnitzer faction’s attempt to bully the President into a catastrophic
war.
Kennedy
decided to impose a naval blockade around Cuba, which could interdict
any ships transporting offensive weapons. As both the United States and
the Soviets continued testing nuclear weapons throughout the crisis, the
entire world awaited the outcome, and the likely death of humanity.
Kennedy
said that if the Soviets removed the missiles, he would pledge never to
invade Cuba. He kept in touch with Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchov
through private channels, and sent his brother Robert to meet in strict
secrecy with Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin. The crisis ended with
the successful offer to take the missiles out of Turkey, the removal to
occur quietly six months later on.
The Manchurian Candidate,
a film about a plot to take over the White House by assassination, was
released to American movie theaters at the height of the 13-day missile
crisis. Its director, John Frankenheimer, became very close to Robert
Kennedy.[50] Frankenheimer bought the rights to Seven Days in May,
the novel about a future coup d’etat in the USA, and proceeded to make
it into a movie. President Kennedy and his staff gave Frankenheimer
their active, eager cooperation in the film-making project. The movie is
a startling reflection of the psychology of the two sides, the mortal
enemies who had confronted each other within the Excomm during the
missile crisis.
Lyman
Lemnitzer, defeated in the Cuban Missile Crisis and sacked as Joint
Chiefs’ chairman—but not incarcerated—went over to Paris as head of NATO
military forces. Lemnitzer inherited a continent-wide covert apparatus
of Mafia killers, Hitler Nazis and Mussolini fascists, French colonial
diehards, and white mercenaries fuming about the loss of Africa. This
was the “stay-behind” network he had seen constructed after World War II
by the British Secret Service, with help from Dulles and logistical
support by himself. It was not until October 1990 that Italian Prime
Minister Giulio Andreotti rocked the political world by revealing the
existence of this covert network, which came to be called after the name
for its Italian section, “Gladio.”
This
was the apparatus that had repeatedly attempted to murder President de
Gaulle, who finally kicked NATO and Lemnitzer out of France in 1967.
Intimidation
by “Gladio” had worked a 1964 coup d’etat in Italy, forcing the
government to purge ministers and parties favoring East-West
cooperation. The apparatus had killed several German leaders who were
seeking peaceful relations between East and West.
Its
most notorious crime was the so-called Strategy of Tension, exploding
bombs and murdering civilians in the name of non-existent radical
groups, to foster servile obedience in the population.[51]
The apparatus had carried out the 1978 “Red Brigades” kidnapping and
murder of Italian Prime Minister Aldo Moro. This was the same “false
flag” terror campaign that Lemnitzer had unsuccessfully proposed to
President Kennedy for the USA. The tactic has persisted into the present
age of terror and counter-terror.
In
1967, New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison would prosecute
CIA/MI6 asset Clay Shaw as a perpetrator of the JFK assassination,
showing that Shaw was a central figure in the Italian Gladio murder
apparatus.
9. What the World Lost in the American Coup
The
peaceful outcome of the Cuban Missile Crisis, serving the mutual
interests of the United States and the Russians, was a decisive victory
of Kennedy over his Anglo-American opponents. With the grateful opinion
of a reprieved world at his back, he immediately pressed the advantage,
acting to secure a future in which American interests were once again
identified with the world’s progress and safety.
His
murder one year later (November 22, 1963) ought to be recognized as the
decisive act in a coup d’etat against the United States. The resultant
absence of America’s unique optimism and creativity from world affairs
was everywhere deeply demoralizing.
We
may now be witnessing a global popular revolt against the failed system
which Kennedy’s enemies imposed after his death: uncontrolled financial
speculation, deindustrialization, and the devastation of permanent
wars. It may now be possible, culturally and politically, for citizens
to once again understand Kennedy’s traditional American viewpoint, which
has otherwise been incomprehensible to generations subjected to
humiliation and social degradation. We will briefly here examine how
Kennedy, as the representative and leading American, acted on the world
immediately after he had faced down and defeated his internal enemies in
the Missile Crisis.
Kennedy’s
first target was the Congo, engulfed by war and chaos since the
imperial murder of Prime Minister Lumumba just before Kennedy’s
Presidency had begun.
The
old, hideously cruel colonial system in Africa had little support at
that time outside the City of London, Wall Street, and a hard-right
circle supporting the financiers. But the British royals and their
continental cousins, together with their secret services and military
apparatus, defined their very existence around their colonial-sector
investments. The original Belgian crown colony in the Congo had long ago
come under control of interlocked banking and mining interests linking
British Rhodesia and Congo’s Katanga province, joined by Morgan,
Rockefeller and other clients of the Dulles Brothers.[52]
The
London “Katanga Lobby” steered the Congo mayhem from their castles,
from White’s, and from the Worshipful Companies of the City of London.
Its leaders were the Marquess of Salisbury, his cousin Lord Selborne
(Roundell Palmer), Lord Clitheroe, Ulick Alexander, and Captain Charles
Waterhouse, who together managed the British Royal Household,
represented royal investments, ran Tanganyika Concessions and Union
Minière du Haut Katanga, owned the relevant central African railroads,
deployed regional mercenary gangs, and controlled the funding mechanisms
for the Conservative Party.
Acting
only a month after the Soviet stand-down in Cuba, President Kennedy got
the rather reluctant Belgian Foreign Minister Paul Henri Spaak to issue
a joint statement with him, threatening “severe economic measures”
against Katanga unless secession were quickly ended. Kennedy
simultaneously applied painful political pressure on the British regime
that was backing the Congo’s dissolution: he decided to prevent the U.K.
from acquiring an independent nuclear weapons delivery system, the
Skybolt air-to-ground missile, which they had counted on acquiring from
the USA The British press blasted Kennedy; Anglophile right-wingers in
the Deep South attacked him for betraying the White Race. Kennedy met
with Prime Minister MacMillan and forced him to accept an American
nuclear-umbrella defense of Britain in place of Skybolt.
With
the British reeling, Kennedy moved the United Nations to support the
Congo’s national sovereignty with U.N. military forces and U.S.
logistics. Within weeks, peace was restored, the Katanga secession was
crushed, Katanga leader Moise Tshombe was arrested, and the Congo
government asked British diplomats to leave.
A letter to the London Daily Telegraph,
January 9, 1963, expressed imperial rage: “We … have witnessed three …
attempts at world domination, first by Hitler, then by Stalin … and now
by President Kennedy.” But this hatred was perhaps not widely shared
among Britons, who were alive because the American President had
followed his own judgment and had not been intimidated by anti-Russian
madmen.
The
Akosombo Hydroelectric Dam, the joint Ghana-U.S. great project, was
then midway to completion. More broadly, Kennedy sought to employ
nuclear energy as a peace-building development tool. The International
Atomic Energy Agency started a panel dedicated to nuclear
desalination/irrigation works as joint projects of the United States and
Russia, Israel and the north African Arabs, India and Pakistan, North
and South America.
Kennedy’s “Peace Speech”
After
securing the Congo, Kennedy moved diplomatically for a U.S.-Soviet
agreement to end nuclear weapons testing, and pushed strongly towards a
broad agreement to scale back the suicidal arms race. A Test Ban Treaty
among the U.S., U.S.S.R., UK and France had been another item on the
Spring 1960 Paris summit agenda, which was wrecked by the U-2 spy plane
incident.
JFK’s famous “Peace Speech” came on June 10, 1963 as the commencement address at American University in Washington, DC.[53]
He announced that the United States would unilaterally stop testing
nuclear weapons, to encourage a U.S.-Soviet accord. He said that Russia
had suffered more than any other country to defeat Hitler.
He asked Americans to re-examine their own attitudes toward Russia:
…
not to see only a distorted and desperate view of the other side, not
to see conflict as inevitable, accommodation as impossible, and
communication as nothing more than an exchange of threats. No government
or social system is so evil that its people must be considered as
lacking in virtue. As Americans, we find communism profoundly repugnant
as a negation of personal freedom and dignity. But we can still hail the
Russian people for their many achievements—in science and space, in
economic and industrial growth, in culture and in acts of courage…. What
kind of peace do we seek? Not a Pax Americana enforced on the world by
American weapons of war. Not the peace of the grave or the security of
the slave…. Our problems are man-made—therefore, they can be solved by
man.
The
USA and the Soviets soon entered into a treaty partially banning
nuclear bomb testing, opening the way toward greater accords.
The next day after the peace speech, Kennedy reported to the American people on the fight for civil rights.[54] Again, he challenged American attitudes:
One
hundred years of delay have passed since President Lincoln freed the
slaves, yet their heirs, their grandsons, are not fully free. They are
not yet freed from the bonds of injustice. They are not yet freed from
social and economic oppression. And this Nation, for all its hopes and
all its boasts, will not be fully free until all its citizens are free.
We
preach freedom around the world, and we mean it, and we cherish our
freedom here at home, but are we to say to the world, and much more
importantly, to each other that this is the land of the free except for
the Negroes; that we have no second-class citizens except Negroes; that
we have no class or caste system, no ghettoes, no master race except
with respect to Negroes?
Now the time has come for this Nation to fulfill its promise.
With
the additional impetus of the Civil Rights Movement’s August 28, 1963
March on Washington, the occasion of the Rev. Martin Luther King’s “I
have a dream” speech, the Kennedy Administration began crafting the
epochal civil rights legislation that would be passed after his
assassination.
In
the last weeks of his life, he pressed for a joint space program with
the Soviet Union; at the U.N. on September 20, he called for a joint
U.S.-Soviet expedition to the Moon.[55]
On
October 5, President Kennedy decided to withdraw U.S. military advisers
from Vietnam to prevent an American war there. This decision was given
force by his National Security Action Memorandum 263, issued October 11,
1963.[56]
Kennedy was quietly putting out peace feelers to Fidel Castro, when he was shot to death.
***
This,
then, is what Senator Chuck Schumer (Dem., NY) meant January 3, 2017
when he tried to intimidate Donald Trump by calling him “really dumb”
for attacking the covert agencies: “Let me tell you, you take on the
intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back
at you.”
Schumer’s brutal threat was that Trump would get the Kennedy treatment.
Since
the murder of the last President to stand up decisively to the
oligarchs, the United States and Britain have been led to abandon
industrial progress in their own countries, and to attack the right of
poor countries to industrialize as “environmentally dangerous,” and as a
potential military risk if such countries were to know too much
science. Governments, bribed and coerced, have surrendered economic
control to financiers who are universal plunderers.
They
have launched dozens of new Bay of Pigs wars–in Iraq, Libya, Syria, all
over Africa and all around Russia–killing millions, producing only
refugees and terrorists, even as they “preach freedom around the world.”
They paid billions of dollars to buy the forcible overthrow of the
elected president in Ukraine when he opted for closer relations with
neighboring Russia.
Citizens’
revulsion against the Establishment swept Europe and hit the United
States in the 2016 elections, in the votes cast both for Bernie Sanders
and for Donald Trump. When Wikileaks exposed Hillary Clinton’s betrayal
of her country—she had assured her Wall Street sponsors that they would
control national policy—the frantic lie came back that Russia was
somehow responsible for leaking Clinton’s secret speech, and thus Russia
had meddled in the U.S. elections.
NATO—the
NATO of Lord Harold Alexander and his idolizer Lyman Lemnitzer—is now
stationing American and British troops in the Baltic countries on
Russia’s borders, preparing for a Third World War.
It
takes little imagination to think how quickly and forcibly the United
States would have reacted during the Cold War, if the Soviet Union had
stationed Soviet combat-ready troops just across the U.S. border in
Mexico.
Kennedy
acted to remove Allen Dulles and Lyman Lemnitzer. Kennedy’s murder gave
their faction a victory, but not until he had left an indelible mark on
human history.
President
Donald Trump has fired FBI Director James Comey for his participation
in the blatant coup attempt against Trump on the anti-Russian theme.
Proceeding
further in the face of the coup, Trump decided to send a U.S.
delegation to Beijing for the Belt and Road summit meeting on global
infrastructure, to discuss the way out of strategic disaster.
China
has recently raised hundreds of millions of its people out of poverty.
And it has now been joined by Russia and many other like-minded nations
to build the greatest set of transport, electric power and industrial
projects ever seen.
John F. Kennedy’s 100th birthday is commemorated on May 29, 2017.
The
United States, which brought electricity to the world in the 19th
century, and brought the world to the Moon in the 20th, could best
celebrate JFK’s memory by joining in our era’s great infrastructure
projects—and thus rejoining the civilized world.
1 On
October 24, 1942, the U.S. Alien Property Custodian issued Vesting
Order 248, seizing the shares in “Union Banking Corporation” held by E.
Roland Harriman (brother of Averell Harriman), Prescott Bush (father of
President George H.W. Bush), three Nazi executives, and two other
Harriman partners. The UBC had been created in the 1920s for a single
client, Fritz Thyssen, Adolf Hitler’s chief political fundraiser. See
also Anton Chaitkin and Webster Tarpley, George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography (Washington: Executive Intelligence Review, 1992), pp. 26-44. ↑
2 Prince
Max Hohenlohe was loosely related to British royalty, and had holdings
in Spain and Mexico, besides his estates in Czechoslovakia’s
Sudetenland. He longed for a return to the feudal imperial world of the
Habsburgs. Back in 1938, Prince Max had helped bring the British and
Nazi-German governments to the ill-fated agreement at Munich, allowing
Hitler to take control of Czechoslovakia. London interests then joined
Berlin in looting the subdued Czechs. The whole swindle soon blew up in
World War II. ↑
3 Stephen Dorril, MI6: Inside the Covert World of Her Majesty’s Secret Intelligence Service (New York: The Free Press, 2000), p. 168. ↑
4 Franklin D. Roosevelt, Address to the White House Correspondents’ Association,
February 12, 1943. Roosevelt had in mind the immense Soviet death toll,
which would reach over 27 million civilians and soldiers, in fighting
Hitler. This Russian sacrifice on humanity’s behalf would be brought up
by President Kennedy in his famous 1963 peace speech at American
University. ↑
5 James L. Binder, Lemnitzer: A Soldier for His Time
(Washington and London: Brassey’s, 1997). This is the authorized
Lemnitzer biography, written with the cooperation of the general’s
family and his Anglo-American military faction. ↑
6 Binder, Lemnitzer, see chapter entitled “The Mentor,” pp. 106-125. ↑
7 Binder, Lemnitzer,
pp. 9-10. “When Lemnitzer sat for formal photographs or was otherwise
conscious of the camera, he almost always turned the back of his left
hand toward the lens so that the ring on his third finger would show. It
was his West Point class ring, but the reason he displayed it so
prominently was that it also carried the Masonic emblem. The general
took his masonic obligations very seriously; he joined the freemasons in
1922 when he was a young lieutenant at Fort Adams, Rhode Island,
eventually became a 32nd Degree Mason, and finally attained the honorary
rank of 33rd Degree. He was a member of the Masons’ Shrine, whose
charitable work for orphans probably helped influence his strong
interest in Korean orphanages when he was [later] Far East commander in
chief. A sure way of getting the general’s attention was to identify
yourself as a Mason; military members of all ranks wrote to him,
addressing him as ‘brother’ and being addressed the same way in
Lemnitzer’s reply.” ↑
9 Karl
Wolff had been chief of personal staff to SS boss Heinrich Himmler, and
later was Himmler’s intermediary with Hitler. Wolff had supervised the
deportation of Jews from the Warsaw Ghetto to be exterminated. He wrote
from Hitler’s headquarters to Nazi railway chief Albert Ganzenmüller on
August 13, 1942, referring to shipment of victims to the Treblinka death
camp: “I note with particular pleasure from your communication that a
train with 5,000 members of the chosen people has been running daily for
14 days and that we are accordingly in a position to continue with this
population movement at an accelerated pace…. I thank you once again for
the effort and at the same time wish to ask you to continue monitoring
these things. With best wishes and Heil Hitler, yours sincerely W.”
Kerstin von Lingen, Allen Dulles, the OSS, and Nazi War Criminals: The Dynamics of Selective Prosecution (Cambridge University Press, 2013), p. 216. ↑
10 Michigan State University, “Seventeen Moments in Soviet History,”
Roosevelt to Stalin, March 25, 1945:“[I have received the contents of] a
letter … from Mr. Molotov regarding an investigation being made by
Field Marshal Alexander into a reported possibility of obtaining the
surrender of part or all of the German army in Italy. In this letter Mr.
Molotov demands that, because of the non-participation therein of
Soviet officers, this investigation to be undertaken in Switzerland
should be stopped forthwith.“The facts of this matter I am sure have,
through a misunderstanding, not been correctly presented to you. The
following are the facts:“Unconfirmed information was received some days
ago in Switzerland that some German officers were considering the
possibility of arranging for the surrender of German troops that are
opposed to Field Marshal Alexander’s British-American Armies in
Italy.“Upon the receipt of this information in Washington, Field Marshal
Alexander was authorized to send to Switzerland an officer or officers
of his staff to ascertain the accuracy of the report and if it appeared
to be of sufficient promise to arrange with any competent German
officers for a conference to discuss details of the surrender with Field
Marshal Alexander at his headquarters in Italy. If such a meeting could
be arranged Soviet representatives would, of course, be welcome.
“Information concerning this investigation to be made in Switzerland was
immediately communicated to the Soviet Government. Your Government was
later informed that it will be agreeable for Soviet officers to be
present at Field Marshal Alexander’s meetings with German officers if
and when arrangements are finally made in Berne for such a meeting at
Caserta to discuss details of a surrender.
“Up to the present time the attempts by our representatives to arrange a
meeting with German officers have met with no success, but it still
appears that such a meeting is a possibility
“My Government, as you will of course understand, must give every
assistance to all officers in the field in command of Allied forces who
believe there is a possibility of forcing the surrender of enemy troops
in their area….
“There can be in such a surrender of enemy forces in the field no
violation of our agreed principle of unconditional surrender and no
political implications whatever….” ↑
12 Stuart Rosenblatt, “The British Empire’s Cold War vs. the U.S.-Russia Alliance,” Executive Intelligence Review, July 11, and August 1, 2014, provides an overview of British-guided postwar strategy. ↑
13 Allen
Dulles justified the ratlines by stressing, in each case, how the
individual Nazi in question had better manners than the typical brute,
wanted to be useful to the Western cause, and had at some point been in
factional conflict with Hitler—just as he himself claimed that, by the
late 1930s, he had criticized the pro-Nazi policy of his brother and
their law firm, Sullivan and Cromwell. ↑
15 Navy
Lieutenant John F. Kennedy had been honorably discharged on March 1,
1945, due to painful injuries sustained when a Japanese destroyer had
smashed through his tiny patrol boat. For a summary account of Kennedy’s
public life, see Anton Chaitkin, “John F. Kennedy vs. the Empire,” Executive Intelligence Review, August 30, 2013. ↑
16 Operation Unthinkable: “Russia: Threat to Western Civilization,”
British War Cabinet, Joint Planning Staff—Draft and Final Reports: 22
May, 8 June, and 11 July 1945, Public Record Office, CAB 120/691/109040
/001. ↑
17 The
decision to A-bomb Japan was reached without the approval of senior
U.S. military leaders. General Dwight Eisenhower wrote:“[I]n [July] 1945
… Secretary of War Stimson … informed me that our government was
preparing to drop an atomic bomb on Japan. I was one of those who felt
that there were a number of cogent reasons to question the wisdom of
such an act…. During his recitation of the relevant facts, I had been
conscious of a feeling of depression and so I voiced to him my grave
misgivings, first on the basis of my belief that Japan was already
defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary, and
secondly because I thought that our country should avoid shocking world
opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no
longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives. It was my belief
that Japan was, at that very moment, seeking some way to surrender with a
minimum loss of ‘face’…. ” [Dwight D. Eisenhower, Mandate for Change: The White House Years, 1953-1956 (New
York: Doubleday, 1963), pp. 312-313.]Norman Cousins, a consultant to
General Douglas MacArthur in the American occupation of Japan,
wrote:“MacArthur’s views about the decision to drop the atomic bomb on
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were starkly different from what the general
public supposed. When I asked General MacArthur about the decision to
drop the bomb, I was surprised to learn he had not even been consulted.
What, I asked, would his advice have been? He replied that he saw no
military justification for the dropping of the bomb. The war might have
ended weeks earlier, he said, if the United States had agreed, as it
later did anyway, to the retention of the institution of the emperor.”
[Norman Cousins, The Pathology of Power (New York: W.W. Norton,
1988), pp. 65, 70-71.] Admiral William D. Leahy, Chief of Staff to
Presidents Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman, wrote:”It is my opinion
that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of
no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were
already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea
blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons. The
lethal possibilities of atomic warfare in the future are frightening. My
own feeling was that in being the first to use it, we had adopted an
ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages. I was not
taught to make war in that fashion, and wars cannot be won by destroying
women and children.” [William Leahy, I Was There (New York:
McGraw-Hill, 1950), p. 441.]The outstanding U.S. nuclear chemist Glenn
T. Seaborg was one of a group of the scientists on the bomb’s
development who wrote (in their Franck Committee report):“We believe
that … the use of nuclear bombs for an early, unannounced attack against
Japan [is] inadvisable. If the United States would be the first to
release this new means of indiscriminate destruction upon mankind, she
would sacrifice public support throughout the world, precipitate the
race of armaments, and prejudice the possibility of reaching an
international agreement on the future control of such weapons.” (Political and Social Problems,
Manhattan Engineer District Records, Harrison-Bundy files, folder # 76,
National Archives.) As President, John F. Kennedy would make Glenn
Seaborg chairman of the Atomic Energy Commission, to push for global,
peaceful use of nuclear power, and against the nuclear arms race. The
above quotations from Eisenhower, MacArthur, Leahy and the Franck
committee are cited in Doug Long, “Hiroshima: Was it Necessary?” (http://www.doug-long.com/quotes.htm). ↑
18 William
W. Palmer, 2nd Earl of Selborne, succeeded Alfred Milner as High
Commissioner for South Africa and ran “Milner’s Kindergarten” of rising
imperial rulers; they would form the Round Table strategy circle,
associated with gold magnate Cecil Rhodes, the British Crown and the
Rothschild family. ↑
19 Carroll Quigley, The Anglo-American Establishment, from Rhodes to Cliveden (San Pedro: Books in Focus, 1981), p. 15. ↑
21 Binder, Lemnitzer, pp. 162-165. ↑
23 Roosevelt press conference Feb 23, 1945, op. cit. ↑
25 Lee
Jae-Bong, “US Deployment of Nuclear Weapons in 1950s South Korea &
North Korea’s Nuclear Development: Toward Denuclearization of the Korean
Peninsula,”Japan Focus: the Asia Pacific Journal, February 17,
2009). “Commander-in-Chief of the [United Nations Command] Lyman
Lemnitzer sent a telegram dated January 30, 1956 to the Department of
the Army in which he suggested that it was highly desirable for the
U.S.F[orces]K[orea] to possess weapons with atomic delivery capability
in order to alleviate the imbalance of strength between the opposing
forces in Korea…. U.S. diplomatic correspondence during the 1950s [shows
that] the U.S.F.K. started deploying nuclear weapons in January 1958 at
the latest. But according to a secret report written by the U.S.
Pacific Command, nuclear weapons were first deployed to South Korea in
1957 and withdrawn in 1991. The Washington Post also reported in October
2006 that ‘In 1957, the United States placed nuclear-tipped Matador
missiles in South Korea, to be followed in later years … by nuclear
artillery…’” ↑
27 Kennedy
would later meet with Guinea’s nationalist President Sékou Touré, and
became his confidant. Most importantly, Kennedy opened channels of
communication with Ghana’s President Kwame Nkrumah, who had lived for 10
years in FDR’s America, and returned to lead the struggle against
Britain. In March 1957, Nkrumah had declared Ghana’s independence as the
first black African nation to overthrow colonial rule. ↑
28 “De Gaulle and Nehru Hold ‘Useful’ Pre-Summit Talk,” New York Times, May 9, 1960. ↑
29 Binder, Lemnitzer, pp. 245-246, quotes from Mark S. Watson, Baltimore Sun,
August 8, 1960: “There was no question in the minds of the public that
many thousands, even millions, of civilians would die in a nuclear
attack; what was not clear was how order would be restored afterward….
The chief of staff stated: ‘As proved by the handling of lesser
peacetime disasters over and over again, the surest means of broad-scale
relief and recovery is the nation’s military organization—organized,
disciplined and of all establishments the best equipped for that urgent
responsibility.’” ↑
30 The
Turkey missiles were officially a NATO project, carried out with the
support of two key NATO officials who were factionally close to
Lemnitzer: Sir Evelyn Shuckburgh, a high official of the British
foreign-policy establishment who was then Assistant Secretary General of
NATO, stationed at NATO headquarters in Paris; and French Air Force
General Maurice Challe, Commander-in-Chief of Allied Forces in Central
Europe, who had led the brutal counter-insurgency against the Algerian
Arabs.Shuckburgh and Challe were old imperial dance partners. Years
earlier, Sir Evelyn had confided to his diary, “the Americans are not
backing us anywhere. In fact, having destroyed the Dutch empire, the
United States are now engaged in undermining the French and British
empires as hard as they can” (quoted in Dorril, MI6, page 497). Tony Shaw, Eden, Suez and the Mass Media(London:
I.B. Tauris & Co., 1966), p. 67 reports that in 1956, Gen. Challe
had visited with UK Prime Minister Anthony Eden (whom he served as
principal private secretary) to propose that Britain, France and Israel
should jointly invade Egypt to overthrow President Nasser, and pretend
it was just an Israeli defensive move. President Eisenhower forced their
withdrawal from Egypt in the Suez Crisis. ↑
31 Fletcher Knebel and Charles W. Bailey II, No High Ground (New York: Harper & Row, 1960). ↑
32 Kennedy
chose Douglas Dillon even though he had been the pro-imperial
Ambassador to France until 1957. In Kennedy’s famous 1957 speech on
Algerian independence, Kennedy had named Dillon as part of the problem
of the Dulles-dominated American policy. ↑
33 The following letter by Lord David Lea to the London Review of Books
(April 11, 2013) politely reviewed Britain’s culpability, a half
century after Lumumba’s assassination.“WE DID IT“[Quoting a previous
letter:] ‘The question remains whether British plots to assassinate
Lumumba … ever amounted to anything. At present, we do not know’….
Actually, in this particular case, I can report that we do. It so
happens that I was having a cup of tea with Daphne Park—we were
colleagues from opposite sides of the Lords—a few months before she died
in March 2010. She had been consul and first secretary in Leopoldville,
now Kinshasa, from 1959 to 1961, which in practice (this was
subsequently acknowledged) meant head of MI6 there. I mentioned the
uproar surrounding Lumumba’s abduction and murder, and recalled the
theory that MI6 might have had something to do with it. ‘We did,’ she
replied, ‘I organised it.’“We went on to discuss her contention that
Lumumba would have handed over the whole lot to the Russians: the
high-value Katangese uranium deposits as well as the diamonds and other
important minerals largely located in the secessionist eastern state of
Katanga. Against that, I put the point that I didn’t see how suspicion
of Western involvement and of our motivation for Balkanising their
country would be a happy augury for the new republic’s peaceful
development. David Lea London SW1.” Lord Lea’s letter sparked a political row, featuring an ambiguous response from the BBC. ↑
36 During
his ten years in the USA, Nkrumah had seen how FDR’s Tennessee Valley
Authority dams had helped end backwardness in the South; he saw this
could be done once Ghana was free to improve itself. ↑
37 Claude Krief, in L’Express, cited in William Blum, Killing Hope: U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II (London: Zed Books, 2003), pp. 150-151. ↑
38 Binder, Lemnitzer, p. 273. ↑
39 James Reston, New York Times, April 29, 1961 ↑
40 Krief, cited in Blum, op. cit. ↑
41 Thomas P. Brady, “Paris Rumors on C.I.A.,” New York Times, May 2, 1961. ↑
42 David Talbot, The Devil’s Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America’s Secret Government (New York: 2015, Harper). ↑
43 The memorandum was reproduced with an article by Galbraith and his aide Heather Purcell, “Did the U.S. Military Plan a Nuclear First Strike for 1963?” which appeared in the American Prospect,
number 19, Fall 1994, pp. 88-96. The text was as follows:TOP
SECRET—EYES ONLYNotes on National Security Council MeetingJuly 20,
1961General Hickey, Chairman of the Net Evaluation Subcommittee,
presented the annual report of his group. General Lemnitzer stated that
the assumption of this year’s study was a surprise attack in late 1963,
preceded by a period of heightened tensions.
After the presentation by General Hickey and by the various members of
the Subcommittee, the President asked if there had ever been made an
assessment of damage results to the U.S.S.R which would be incurred by a
preemptive attack. General Lemnitzer stated that such studies had been
made and that he would bring them over and discuss them personally with
the President. In recalling General Hickey’s opening statement that
these studies have been made since 1957, the President asked for an
appraisal of the trend in the effectiveness of the attack. General
Lemnitzer replied that he would also discuss this with the President.
Since the basic assumption of this year’s presentation was an attack in
late 1963, the President asked about probable effects in the winter of
1962. Mr. Dulles observed that the attack would be much less effective
since there would be considerably fewer missiles involved. General
Lemnitzer added a word of caution about accepting the precise findings
of the Committee since these findings were based upon certain
assumptions which themselves might not be valid.
The President posed the question as to the period of time necessary for
citizens to remain in shelters following an attack. A member of the
Subcommittee replied that no specific period of time could be cited due
to the variables involved, but generally speaking, a period of two weeks
should be expected.
The President directed that no member in attendance at the meeting
disclose even the subject of the meeting. Declassified: June, 1993. ↑
44 Quoted by Galbraith, op. cit. ↑
47 Binder, Lemnitzer, p. 306. ↑
48 Fletcher Knebel and Charles Bailey II, Seven Days in May (New York: Harper & Row, 1962). ↑
49 Binder, Lemnitzer, p. 309. ↑
50 John
Frankenheimer would go on to produce campaign ads for Bobby Kennedy’s
1968 run for the Presidency. Frankenheimer was in Los Angeles with Bobby
after the California primary victory made Bobby the likely next
President, and was devastated by Bobby’s assassination that same night. ↑
52 In
the April 1962 showdown over steel price increases, Kennedy had used
the government’s full force to defeat the Anglophile Morgan and
Rockefeller interests, who dominated the steel industry with an
anti-industrial, speculative financial bias. JFK said, “the American
people will find it hard, as I do, to accept a situation in which a tiny
handful of steel executives whose pursuit of private power and profit
exceeds their sense of public responsibility can show such utter
contempt for the interests of 185 million Americans” (https://www.jfklibrary.org/Research/Research-Aids/Ready-Reference/Press-Conferences/News-Conference-30.aspx). ↑
We Offer Loan At A Very Low Rate Of 3%. If Interested, Kindly contact Us Now.email us now reply to email (urgentloan22@gmail.com)
ReplyDelete