Should We Be Like Iceland? A Controversial and Alternative Approach to Economic Turmoil
By
Posted on
Powered by 
Translate
Translate
Credit: True Activist
In the midst of a viral meme claiming that the US (and other European nations) should “be like Iceland” and the recent claims that Wall Street owns the US government, this is a glimpse into what really occurred in Iceland during the 2008 financial collapse and how some speculate we could have learned from it.
Is everything in the meme regarding Iceland’s economic solutions and recovery true? Upon further research, it is surprising to report that yes, it is. Of course, these are only small statements meant to represent a portion of the big picture and it makes no mention of how the country reacted and how the rest of the world was impacted. As with the Denmark meme regarding their own economic policies, this meme leaves a lot to be desired and must be broken down to understand if the US can extract anything from Iceland’s economic solutions.
Credit: Wikimedia
Based on comments from when the meme was
originally posted, one of the biggest criticisms is that Iceland is
incredibly small compared to the US population and policies that they
implement could never work here. The criticism of the size comparison is
completely reasonable; Iceland has 0.1% of the population that the US does,
but it is hardly fair to say that nothing in their strategy is worth
learning about. Though they may have only had 3 banks fail in their
collapse, compared to our 465 between 2008-2012, their collapse in comparison to the US collapse, their collapse based on the size of their economy was the “largest experienced by any country in economic history.”
So although there is a size differentiation, their stakes were raised
even more by the size of their collapse relative to their population and
economy, yet they managed to do what no other country did under the
same circumstances: they let their banks collapse.
Credit: Web Wizardry
Their three biggest banks collapsed in 2008 and caused massive problems for the country,
its shareholders, and foreign investors overnight. Iceland nationalized
one of their banks, as the US did with a few of theirs, and broke the
other two big banks up into smaller, new banks in order to continue
running domestic operations. Instead of forming a bailout program like
George W. Bush did for the US with TARP, the Troubled Asset Relief
Program, Iceland took other steps
to control their currency and domestic impact. After letting their
banks fail, they then devalued their own currency, introduced capital
controls to control the money coming in and out of their capital
account, and got out of paying the minimum deposit guarantees
to Dutch and British investors. This last move was huge, as it allowed
the country to invest more in its own citizens by forgiving mortgage
debt rather than worrying about the fallout for other nations. Was this a
selfish strategy? Perhaps, but in such a crisis, one can argue that
they needed to first get their country and citizens back in order before
they could worry about the rest of the world and properly assist in the
overall crisis.
Credit: Wikimedia
All of these measures were not, however,
produced from the same government that was in place when the economy
first collapse. It is important to note that there was a period of
political unrest within Iceland with protests demanding for the
resignation of their current government and for a new election to be
held. As a result, the government did resign,
elections took place, and they elected a new left-wing government in
2009. So although the government responded swiftly to the demands of the
people and favored their rights over the bank’s, unrest amongst the
people was still unavoidable.
Another huge step that Iceland took was they prosecuted the criminals responsible
for the collapse in their country. Not only did they prosecute them and
send many of them to prison, they made them pay off loans for some of
the consumers and sign documents that forgave mortgage debt, sometimes
for even more than the property value. Of course this didn’t solve their
problems overnight, and today, just like in the US, there are still
issues of unemployment and GDP that are recovering from the shock of the
collapse. However, they have been hailed as having recovered much more
quickly than many other nations in the same situation.
Credit: Internationalist
The question remains: is there something
that the US could have learned from Iceland in the wake of economic
turmoil? The answer is yes, always, because we can all learn from each
other, even if the lesson is what not to do. However, I think
there is something to be said about every step of their strategy. The US
couldn’t simply let their banks fail because the experts and leaders in
the economic industry didn’t even see it coming, despite warnings from
some of the people within their field. We could, however, have allowed
more of our banks to receive no support at all and better regulate the
funds we delegated to banks we did bailout to ensure that the money was
going to the right place or instead used some of that $700 billion to
citizens to forgive mortgage debt or pay off their loans. Instead, what
we got was an unregulated program that eventually led to investigations
and prosecutions for fraud because the bank owners were still just
using it to turn a profit or telling investors that their invested money
was going towards the program. Additionally, only one top banker went
to jail for the crimes they committed and the turmoil they caused.
Certainly, at the very least, we could have prosecuted more bankers and
filled their positions in order to send the message that this greedy and
reckless behavior within our economy would not be tolerated.
Though it’s hard to say what would have
happened if we had taken the same approach as Iceland with our collapse
since it is all just speculation, one thing is for certain: big banks
received little to no punishment, though the impact was global, and
learned nothing from their actions. In the words of Mark Baum from the
movie The Big Short about the years leading up to the crisis,
“The whole time we were wondering how the big banks could be so stupid…
They didn’t care. They knew the tax payers had to bail them out.” And
that we did.
This article (Should We Be Like Iceland? A Controversial and Alternative Approach to Economic Turmoil) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and TrueActivist.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment