To
understand events like the crash that killed 224 Russian citizens in
Sinai, there are so many misconceptions that have to be addressed.
Whatever confusion, betrayal or suffering needs to be addressed, and all
three are there in spades, the “Charlie” cartoons, obnoxious and
hateful, will be addressed first.
Veterans
Today is a clearing house for intelligence leaks from a number of
countries, the US certainly but two dozen others as well. We are
thankful that there are so many out there who get us the truth and more
thankful that they represent factions of those who still value honor and
decency and are seldom “lone wolf” whistleblowers, driven by scarred
psyche’s and bizarre personal agendas.
That
being said, I continue here down a very slippery slope but not alone,
backed by my friends in the US, Russia and around the world. If there is
reason for hope, and on many days finding reason for hope is almost
impossible, this may well be it. It is for me, certainly.
We
are addressing the attack on Russia, which is what we are terming the
downing of a civilian airliner. It was a personal attack on President
Putin, by my estimation, and we will get to this and those responsible
but first we will address “Charlie” Hebdo after their “cartoon attack”
tied to the crash.
The
January 7, 2015 “attack” on “Charlie” was not what it seemed. Veterans
Today, with its extensive Paris based news organization, was able to
track down several leads while VT editor Kevin Barrett and penned the
“medium best seller, “We are NOT Charlie, Free Thinkers Question the
French 9/11.”
“Charlie” was as much a test of international levels of ignorance as anything else.
In
order to confirm or debunk any incident, it is only necessary to attack
the weakest link. With the “Charlie” shootings, we had a high quality
video of two terrorists supposedly killing a French police officer with
assault rifles.
Doing
a frame by frame analysis and ballistic tests, which included blood
spatter analysis, we conclusively proved that the video showed
terrorists firing blanks and that this one episode was staged by actors.
I did the impact analysis myself and, while doing comparisons, where
the French scene had powerful and highly penetrating assault rifle
cartridges blowing puffs of dust, when reenacted with real bullets
baseball sized pieces of concrete blew out of the pavement.
The video showed nothing of the kind, quite the opposite, a childishly staged piece of street theatre “on the cheap.”
We
don’t even want to begin talking about what happens when you shoot
someone in the head while they are laying on a sidewalk. John Kennedy’s
head was supposedly “exploded” by a single low power 6.5mm rifle
cartridge. The 7.62mm from an AK47 combined with a powerful muzzle blast
from inches away totally obliterates a human head, much less as in the
“Charlie” staged video which was both blood and injury free. There were
also no appropriate muzzle blasts or recoil and muzzle rise. The blanks
had to have been loaded with almost no powder at all, in weapons with
barrels heavily crimped to protect the actors and provide backpressure
to allow auto-reloading. We tested that too.
My own estimation is that a movie “prop department” was used.
Real
world analysis; blood and brains would be stuck to everything within 15
feet with a high likelihood that pieces of skull would, on their own,
have wounded or killed the imaginary terrorists.
The
staged obscenity that brought Netanyahu to Paris to shove his way to
the front of a funeral cortege was just another political game, like so
many.
I
am not an “activist” with an agenda. I simply use forensic training to
critique the childish exercises of intelligence agencies who stage such
events for a controlled press.
Thus,
when “Charlie” tries to anger and humiliate the Russian people by
publishing its current “usual obscenity,” more an insult to the fine
French people than anything else, we ask why. Now we look at the downing
of the Russian plane.
VT
personnel know the Sinai well. VT editor Jeff Smith was there with the
UN for some years and has furnished us with his personal photo album of
tents, sand and helicopter rides. The first thing VT did was look at the
video supplied by those claiming to be ISIS. Backtracking the position
using analytical tools,, we quickly found an abandoned Wadi on the
flight path which tracked back to a single road, straight to an Egyptian
port with a ferry to Jordan.
We also
found the placement of the video team as conclusive evidence that the
explosive device as controlled by far more than a simple timer. It was
likely triggered through satellite communications. Who can do that?
We
also found that the video equipment was relatively sophisticated but
the video was downgraded to appear as done by an Apple mobile phone. Who
does that as well?
We were told that
Saudi and Egyptian intelligence used two teams, one planting the bomb at
Sharm al Sheikh while the other, further north, infiltrated Sinai from
Jordan and did the video pretending to be “ISIS.”
Some
of this story was verified when we examined the best evidence, the Al
Jazeera story, a fabrication about an imaginary radio call and planned
landing in Cairo. Jeff Smith pointed out that there is a UN airfield
with sufficient runway for an A321, known to all pilots, very close by
in Sinai.
Al
Jazeera claimed to have an Egyptian source for their story, later
proven to have been fabricated. There was no source. We concluded that
Al Jazeera was part and parcel to the staged terror act, a hypothesis
based on our long experience with that organization and its relationship
to Qatari and Saudi intelligence services.
Al
Jazeera is an intelligence front, continually planting “seeded
material” created by intelligence agencies the same way Wikileaks does,
as was pointed out in December 2010 in an interview on National Public
Radio with Zbiginew Brzezinski.
To
create context, I will run the clock back to 9/11. Though most find
discussions of this event tiresome, we will put minds to rest. We will
take a very short look at one incident on that day, as we did with
“Charlie” and make our case.
At
that time, the most famous journalist in the world was Dan Rather,
evening anchor on CBS News, inheritor to the “throne” as it were, of
Walter Kronkite. On 9/11, Rather reported that a moving van filled with
explosives was stopped by New Jersey State Police on the George
Washington Bridge. There, two individuals were arrested, found to be
“Israeli art students,” who were heavily armed. Quoting Rather, “the van
contained enough explosives to bring down the bridge.”
Two
other such vans were stopped in Manhattan and other arrests were made
as well but were not reported on national television. All those arrested
were Israeli, with over 200 Israelis arrested tied to 9/11 according to
high level sources.
CNN
carried the same report as CBS and Rather, which has been removed from
YouTube many times but still exists, republished on VT last week.
Rather, today, has no memory of making the broadcast. We also have
surveillance logs showing these same “art students” meeting in Fort Lee,
New Jersey, near the bridge, with a Saudi intelligence officer named
Mohammed Atta, cited as the mastermind of 9/11. We end our vignette
here, assume what you will.
“Art
students” were also arrested recovering radio jamming equipment placed
on high rise residential buildings in Fort Lee, New Jersey. We only
mention this to show the scope of events of this kind and to what degree
denial, deception and deceit can influence events.
Now
we address what we have been told about the crash. Our initial
assumption was that Saudi Arabia with or without their supposedly “new
found friends,” the Israelis had done this to humiliate Russia and push
President Putin into an act of reprisal that would bring the US and
Russia to war.
Using
only sources from intelligence agencies, we were then informed that
Russia was under the assumption that Saudi intelligence and their paid
operatives within Egyptian intelligence were responsible. It’s
been stated that: “Half the
Egyptians work for Israel, the other half for Saudi Arabia anyway, Egypt
has no security services, only paid foreign spies.”
Where
does this leave us? If Putin openly attacks the obvious culprits, the
Saudis, as if it was ISIS, everyone will assume Saudi Arabia directed
them. Then, of course, there is no evidence that ISIS can penetrate
airport security. Usually such things are done by Israel, as Israeli
companies tied to the Mossad work in almost every airport and Israel
produces phony passports for assassins the way a potato factory turns
out crisps.
If
Russia fails to act openly, the Russian people will feel weakened and
humiliated. If Russia acts openly, Putin will have allowed himself to be
maneuvered.
This
is why this was done, always a “plan within a plan” as with “Charlie”
or “9/11,” game theory using press assets and the childish narrative
that only the most ignorant of the public and the political puppets who
pretend to be world leaders openly accept.
No comments:
Post a Comment