It has become clear that Obama's illegal war on
Libya turned that notion over to chaos under various al-Qaeda linked forces,
which lead to the murder of Ambassador Stevens, who was left unprotected despite
his repeated calls for more security. It is also clear that Obama is cooperation
with the same jihadists, under Saudi and British direction, in trying to
overthrow the sovereign states of Syria and Iran.
Obama, increasingly exposed for his many crimes,
and nearly collapsing in his first debate, is falling apart, rapidly. The
necessary impeachment , before the election, is increasingly possible.
'Benghazi-gate':
Bring Down Obama
Before It's Too Late
by Nancy
Spannaus
[PDF
version of this article]
Oct. 1—U.S.
Senators, especially on the Republican side of the aisle, have wasted no time in
taking the Obama Administration to task for its obvious malfeasance leading to
the death of U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens, and three other
American personnel. But, under pressure from the President, Senate Foreign
Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry (D-Mass.), and perhaps other nefarious
forces as well, the Senators have, at present, agreed to wait until after
the November election to get answers from the Obama Administration on its
catastrophic failures to protect diplomatic personnel.
A letter sent
to Thomas Nides, Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources, on
Sept. 27, and signed by all 19 members of the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee, requests answers to a long series of questions about attacks on U.S.
embassies, and the Obama Administration's decisions on security, during the
week of Nov. 13! Such a delay is a potentially fatal error.
For every day
that the murderous President Barack Obama remains in office, represents a threat
to both world peace and the security of the United States. Obama has shown no
remorse whatsoever for his
offenses against the U.S. Constitution in such weighty matters as the
unconstitutional war against Libya, the extrajudicial killing of American
citizens, and a wide swath of police-state measures; and he is counting on the
American population swallowing these crimes, and giving him re-election. Yet
Obama's embrace of such imperial powers, means he could act at any time his
sponsors in the British monarchy wish, to launch new crimes, including the
threat to launch wars of regime-change against Syria and/or Iran. Such
aggression would lead directly to confrontation with Russia and China, and thus
to a potential World War III.
In this
context, the Obama Administration's atrocity in Libya represents the best handle
for mobilizing the political momentum to remove the President. Here, it is
obvious that the Administation has subordinated the interests of the American
population, even its own personnel, to its pursuit of a British imperial
geopolitical strategy. The President and his close associates have lied, covered
up, and allied our nation with the worst British-Saudi terrorists, with a
hideous result. If people can't face the truth about him around the murder of
Ambassador Stevens, when will they do so? If they can't impeach a President for
such behavior, when would they do so?
Coverup: The
Watergate Smell
In a Sept. 28
interview on Fox News,[1]
former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee said:
"Let's just
get blunt, no way to sugarcoat this: We've been lied to. We've flat-out been
lied to. They know they lied. It's as if airplanes crashing into the World
Trade Center, and somebody says, 'Those were just accidents; the planes veered
off-course.' Everybody with two eyes and an IQ above plant life understands
that what happened in Egypt and what happened in Libya, was not some
spontaneous reaction to a stupid 13-minute video on YouTube. It was a planned,
coordinated, orchestrated attack, led by terrorists. Terrorists!
"And this
White House has to explain why it hasn't owned up to that, why it can't say
it! And I think, frankly, if this issue really gets the traction that it
deserves, and let me say, that it deserves—let's go back: Richard Nixon was
forced out of office because he lied, and because he covered some stuff up.
I'm going to be blunt and tell you this: Nobody died in Watergate. We have
some people who are dead because of this, and there's some questions to be
answered, and Americans ought to demand to get
answers."
Governor
Huckabee's searing, and totally appropriate, indictment is only the strongest
among other cries of "coverup," which, of course, is the standard formula for
removing politicians from office since the Watergate era.
On Sept. 27,
Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) said, "This is turning into something not short of
Benghazi-gate." Speaking on Fox News, Corker said,
"This has
now turned into a very bipartisan concern. There has to be something that
they're trying to hide or cover up. This is just not the norm. This is way out
of the norm, what is happening in this case."
"The Libya
Debacle: The More We Learn, the More Benghazi Looks Like a Gross Security
Failure," was the Sept. 27 editorial in the Wall Street Journal. The
piece reviewed the shifting White House stories, the failure to provide proper
security to the Benghazi consulate, and other facts, then concluded:
"Four
Americans lost their lives in Benghazi in a terrorist attack that evidence
suggests should have been anticipated and might have been stopped. Rather than
accept responsibility, the Administration has tried to stonewall and blame
others. Congress should call hearings to hold someone accountable for this
debacle."
On the same
day, Rudy Giuliani, former New York City mayor, said on Fox News that the Obama
Administration has engaged in a "coverup" of the nature of the Benghazi
terrorist attack, intended to protect Obama's policies in the Middle East. He
used the phrase "coverup" a half-dozen times.
A Searing
Indictment
The most
comprehensive indictment of the Obama Administration's behavior, and coverup, in
the Benghazi affair—outside the LaRouche movement and its publications—came from
Washington Times columnist Jeffrey Kuhner, in an article published
Sept. 27. Kuhner's column was entitled "Obama Made Libya Safe for Terrorists,
Imperial President Deserves Ouster," and it was right on the mark. We provide
excerpts:
"President
Obama has betrayed the American people. His administration is dissembling and
engaging in a systematic coverup. The reason: Mr. Obama does not want the
public to know he bears heavy responsibility for the recent terrorist attack
against the U.S. Consulate in Libya. He has American blood on his hands—blood
he cannot wash away.
"Islamic
radicals recently besieged our diplomatic mission in Benghazi. The U.S.
ambassador was killed, along with three other Americans. The compound was
leveled. Our flag was taken down and desecrated. The jihadists raised the
black flag of al Qaeda. The assault took place on the anniversary of the Sept.
11, 2001, attacks. Al Qaeda in North Africa immediately announced
responsibility for the carnage. Libya's government said the raid had been
planned and coordinated for months. Even a 9-year-old could grasp that this
was a premeditated terrorist atrocity.
"Not so the
Obama administration. The White House immediately insisted that the attack was
a response to an anti-Muslim video produced in the United States that
supposedly incited religious passions. The video, however, has been
circulating on YouTube since early July. It is badly dubbed and obviously the
work of amateurs. If it was so inflammatory, why didn't riots erupt in the
summer? This is because it had nothing to do with the raid. It was a cheap—and
cynical—pretense to commit murder and mayhem. Even Libya's leaders have
publicly said that the video did not inspire the attack—Islamist hatred
did....
"[T]he
White House is desperately deflecting culpability. Mr. Obama has not engaged
just in irresponsible conduct. The lax security, the dead Americans, the lies
and the coverup—they reveal an amoral, self-absorbed celebrity-in-chief who
puts power and his crass re-election above human decency. Yet it is even more
ominous: Mr. Obama has directly empowered the very Islamists responsible for
the terrorist assault.
"The dirty
little secret is that the president waged an illegal and unconstitutional war
in Libya. He ordered U.S. military strikes that toppled dictator Moammar
Gadhafi without the authorization of Congress. Mr. Obama behaved like an
imperial president, ignoring the American people and deliberately
circumventing Congress. His actions were simply lawless.
"Moreover,
the intervention has transformed Libya into a jihadist haven....
"The Libya
affair will go down in history as one of the worst abuses of presidential
power and abrogation of proper authority. Under Mr. Obama, four Americans are
dead. This is why he needs to be defeated in November. He has committed high
crimes and misdemeanors. The sooner he leaves office, the
better."
Kuhner does
not have the complete story. A full understanding of what the Obama
Administration is up to, requires facing the fact that the President is acting
not only as an insane power-hungry narcissist, but according to a British
imperial attempt to save a dying financial empire by smashing Russia and China,
and imposing a one-world regime over a depopulated world. It means facing the
fact that Obama's remaining free to pursue his course, leads us straight to the
hell of thermonuclear war, and also understanding the American System
alternative that is required to reverse today's collapse into a New Dark
Age.
But an
immediate impeachment proceeding, such as he calls for, would be an excellent
step toward saving the nation.
And in
Congress?
While by
"normal" standards, one could say that Congress has acting expeditiously on the
Benghazi atrocity, it has allowed itself to be foiled on getting fast
answers.
The first to
demand immediate explanations was Sen. Susan Collins (R-Me.), two days after the
events. At the same time, Sens. Corker and James DeMint (R-S.C.) submitted
legislation demanding answers with a month—well before the election. But Senator
Kerry deep-sixed the legislation (S. 3551) before it could move ahead, and
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton appointed an inhouse panel instead, which is
not expected to come up with answers until well into 2013.
One of the
major targets of the letters Congress is shooting off, is Obama's
British-trained United Nations Ambassador, Susan Rice, one of the leading
advocates of the Libya invasion and of future "right to protect" wars. House
Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Buck McKeon (R-Calif.) and four Republican
Senators—John McCain (Ariz.), Kelly Ayotte (N.H.), Lindsey Graham (S.C.), and
Ron Johnson (Wisc.)—sent a letter to Rice Sept. 26, demanding clarification of
her lies about how the attacks on the consulate were the result of a protest
about the film, not acts of terrorism.
On Sept. 28,
House Homeland Security Committee chairman Peter King (R-N.Y.) called for Rice
to resign, for her blatant attempt to coverup the 9/11/2012 assassinations.
Within seconds of King's call, made on CNN-TV, the White House put out a
statement supporting Rice.
Both Rice's
lies and Secretary of State Clinton's uninformative briefing to the Congress
last week, led McKeon and seven other Republican committee chairmen to send a
letter to President Obama on Sept. 26, demanding answers, and indicating their
willingness "to return to Washington to be briefed as soon as the answers to
these questions are ready."
Indeed,
Congress could return to Washington, upon decision of the House and Senate
leaderships, at any time, to deal with this national emergency. Congressmen and
Senators could even raise the necessary questions at the pro-forma sessions
which occur every three days, during this adjournment. But, so far, no one has
shown the guts to take extraordinary action.
Are there
enough American patriots to force them to do so?
[1]
See http://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=9MT1eVJOYbk&feature=player_embedded
Racist Right's New Mentality: If you don't think like them, you're stupid!
ReplyDeleteThat is the racist right's new mentality...actually I'm kinda late. Ever since the black man became the black man in office, I'm of course talking about Barack Obama, more than half of Americans, even the President himself, have had their intelligence insulted by the party of racist, bigots, and extremists!
I read garbage about how Obama is not very bright....So being a graduate of Columbia University and Harvard Law School, where he was president of the Harvard Law Review is not intelligent, but spouting racist lies and fear-mongering crap to vote for Romney is?
Yes, last week's debate proved that Barack Obama is NOT the smartest man in America, just a man. But the racist right are treating Obama's defeat at the hands of a lying Romney that Obama is the MOST retarded man in America...(look in the mirror please), not to mention they have reduce themselves to becoming low-life name-calling insultng the intelligence of a majority of Americans who excerised their right to vote in 2008 and created the first black President.
But like I said many time, there is a majority of so-called "Patriots" (P.S. they are NOT nor are they EVER Patriots, just Racists. Nothing More) that can't stand that.
If there is such a thing as "Christian" compassion (which I doubt), I wish the Obama-haters who submit letters and responses to the Letters to the Editor section would realize that Obama has two young daughters who most likely hear the same kind of garbage and name-calling from other children whose parents think the same way. I cannot think of one other president who has endured as much defamation of character as President Obama, calling him a Marxist, Communist, an America-hater out to destroy the country, a thug, foreign-born, not really our president, a liar, a Muslim who sides with and pals around with terrorists, that his ACA consists of death panels, and he's a Hitler-wannabe, or cartoons of him as a dead ape or a pimp, or pictures of him dressed as a witch doctor.
These lies have not resonated with rational people who know that these personal, disgusting and untruthful attacks on Obama's character are not true, and they have not worked in turning people against our president. And Obama is our legal president.
In a last ditch effort, the GOP has tried to suppress the Democratic vote while committing fraudulent registration themselves, favoring the Republican Party. Many of the new voter ID laws have been stopped in their tracks by the courts.
So, since all else has failed, the new personal attack claims our president is a homosexual involved in drugs and murder. I didn't think the Tea Party Republicans could stoop any lower than they already had, but I was wrong.
Hmm.. Jobless claims at 4 year low, wages up by highest amount in 5 years, unemployment lowest level since 2008, DOW above 13,000, consumer confidence up again to highest point in 4 years, foreclosures down to lowest point in 5 years. Man Obama is SUCH a failure, right?
For example, people love to point to The President as someone who supposedly has Narcissistic Personality Disorder. For that matter, to the degree that many–most?–Republicans believe that virtually anyone suffering any misfortune has brought it on themselves (their perverse application of “personal responsibility”), lack of empathy is almost a prerequisite for membership in the GOP. Nonetheless, only a few politicians seem demonstrably off. Sorry, GOPers, Obama ain’t one of them.
I said it once, twice, and I’ll said it till the day I die. Obama is NOT a fraud. Anyone who calls Obama a fraud is without doubt a racist!
But there is a thousand ways to demonstrate this racist Obama Derangement syndrome and the bulk of our party has caught it. It is embarrassing to belong to the party of Lincoln lately! And that is a tragic and sad admission to make!
The racist right got it bad…